PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2)
This text represents a part of a wider project that concerns the role of prenotional complexes in creating paradigmatic theories, especially in the history of physics.After analyzing certain texts; Aristotle’s, Galileo’s, Newton’s and others, the existence of so called general complexes, which h...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
University of Mostar, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
2009-01-01
|
| Series: | Hum |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://hum.ff.sum.ba/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Humdec2009_125_144.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797202684324872192 |
|---|---|
| author | Zoran Primorac Andrej Ule |
| author_facet | Zoran Primorac Andrej Ule |
| author_sort | Zoran Primorac |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This text represents a part of a wider project that concerns the role of
prenotional complexes in creating paradigmatic theories, especially in
the history of physics.After analyzing certain texts; Aristotle’s, Galileo’s,
Newton’s and others, the existence of so called general complexes, which
have the role of regulation of the theory, was noticed. General complexes
function by the same mechanism as paradigms that Kuhn described in
his works. This work has an assignment to show that his concept of paradigm
is closely connected to general complex and complex thinking. Also,
one deeper analysis of the idea of paradigm itself that Kuhn determines in
his works has been done. We have come to the conclusion that he did not
understand the essence of paradigm, i. e. general complex, which led to
wandering both in defining of the concept and in application of the idea.
Kuhn had tried to define paradigm as a general notion or a matrix, which
is in fact impossible because of its nature, and as a consequence of that
concept of paradigm in his theory appears as a meta-complex. Misunderstanding
of the essence of paradigm will imply wrong interpretation of
the mechanism of general complex itself which, at the end, leads to wrong
conclusions which affect close concepts like revolutionary change of paradigm,
incommensurability of theories etc. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:07:21Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-aa43a8cade4048ef9ca7fc8072540595 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1840-233X 2303-7431 |
| language | deu |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:07:21Z |
| publishDate | 2009-01-01 |
| publisher | University of Mostar, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Hum |
| spelling | doaj.art-aa43a8cade4048ef9ca7fc80725405952024-04-17T09:32:25ZdeuUniversity of Mostar, Faculty of Humanities and Social SciencesHum1840-233X2303-74312009-01-015125144PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2)Zoran Primorac0Andrej Ule1Faculty of Science and Education, University of MostarFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of LjubljanaThis text represents a part of a wider project that concerns the role of prenotional complexes in creating paradigmatic theories, especially in the history of physics.After analyzing certain texts; Aristotle’s, Galileo’s, Newton’s and others, the existence of so called general complexes, which have the role of regulation of the theory, was noticed. General complexes function by the same mechanism as paradigms that Kuhn described in his works. This work has an assignment to show that his concept of paradigm is closely connected to general complex and complex thinking. Also, one deeper analysis of the idea of paradigm itself that Kuhn determines in his works has been done. We have come to the conclusion that he did not understand the essence of paradigm, i. e. general complex, which led to wandering both in defining of the concept and in application of the idea. Kuhn had tried to define paradigm as a general notion or a matrix, which is in fact impossible because of its nature, and as a consequence of that concept of paradigm in his theory appears as a meta-complex. Misunderstanding of the essence of paradigm will imply wrong interpretation of the mechanism of general complex itself which, at the end, leads to wrong conclusions which affect close concepts like revolutionary change of paradigm, incommensurability of theories etc.https://hum.ff.sum.ba/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Humdec2009_125_144.pdfcomplexnotional thinkingregulation of notional structuresparadigmnormal sciencerevolution |
| spellingShingle | Zoran Primorac Andrej Ule PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2) Hum complex notional thinking regulation of notional structures paradigm normal science revolution |
| title | PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2) |
| title_full | PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2) |
| title_fullStr | PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2) |
| title_full_unstemmed | PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2) |
| title_short | PARADIGM AND COMPLEX THINKING (2) |
| title_sort | paradigm and complex thinking 2 |
| topic | complex notional thinking regulation of notional structures paradigm normal science revolution |
| url | https://hum.ff.sum.ba/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Humdec2009_125_144.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zoranprimorac paradigmandcomplexthinking2 AT andrejule paradigmandcomplexthinking2 |