Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities

Abstract This study aimed to test the agreement of the incremental test's physiological responses between tethered running on a nonmotorized treadmill (NMT) to matched relative intensities while running on a conventional motorized treadmill (MT). Using a within-subject crossover design, nine ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filipe A. B. Sousa, Fúlvia B. Manchado-Gobatto, Natália de A. Rodrigues, Gustavo G. de Araujo, Claudio A. Gobatto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13741-w
_version_ 1818488555277647872
author Filipe A. B. Sousa
Fúlvia B. Manchado-Gobatto
Natália de A. Rodrigues
Gustavo G. de Araujo
Claudio A. Gobatto
author_facet Filipe A. B. Sousa
Fúlvia B. Manchado-Gobatto
Natália de A. Rodrigues
Gustavo G. de Araujo
Claudio A. Gobatto
author_sort Filipe A. B. Sousa
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This study aimed to test the agreement of the incremental test's physiological responses between tethered running on a nonmotorized treadmill (NMT) to matched relative intensities while running on a conventional motorized treadmill (MT). Using a within-subject crossover design, nine male recreational runners (age = 22 ± 5 years; height = 175 ± 6 cm; weight = 68.0 ± 16.6 kg) underwent two test sessions: one was an incremental intensity protocol on an MT; the other was on an instrumented NMT. Intensity thresholds at $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ O2max, respiratory compensation point (iRCP), and lactate threshold (iLT) were registered for analysis, together with $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ ̇O2, $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ ̇E, ƒR, and blood lactate concentration ([Lac]). Comparisons were based on hypothesis testing (Student's T-test), effect sizes (Cohen's d), ICC, and Bland Altman analysis. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Attained $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ O2max (MT = 52.2 ± 7.3 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs NMT = 50.1 ± 8.1 mL·kg-1·min-1) and $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ ̇O2 at iRCP (MT = 46.3 ± 7.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs NMT = 42.8 ± 9.3 mL·kg-1·min-1) were not different between ergometers (p = 0.15 and 0.13, respectively), with significant ICCs (0.84 and 0.70, respectively) and Pearson’s correlations (r = 0.87 and 0.76, respectively). The [Lac] at iLT presented poor agreement between conditions. Significant correlations were found (r between 0.72 and 0.83) for relative power values of i $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ O2max (6.56 ± 1.28 W·kg−1), iRCP (4.38 ± 1.50 W·kg−1), and iLT (4.15 ± 1.29 W·kg−1) related to their counterpart obtained on MT. Results show that running on an NMT offers a higher glycolytic demand under the same relative internal load as running on an MT but with a similar aerobic response and correlated intensity determination.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T16:52:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa43c809e3c94c159c8eeef4525ca2f0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T16:52:31Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-aa43c809e3c94c159c8eeef4525ca2f02022-12-22T01:40:50ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-07-011211910.1038/s41598-022-13741-wComparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensitiesFilipe A. B. Sousa0Fúlvia B. Manchado-Gobatto1Natália de A. Rodrigues2Gustavo G. de Araujo3Claudio A. Gobatto4School of Applied Sciences, University of CampinasSchool of Applied Sciences, University of CampinasSchool of Applied Sciences, University of CampinasLaboratory of Applied Sports Sciences, Federal University of AlagoasSchool of Applied Sciences, University of CampinasAbstract This study aimed to test the agreement of the incremental test's physiological responses between tethered running on a nonmotorized treadmill (NMT) to matched relative intensities while running on a conventional motorized treadmill (MT). Using a within-subject crossover design, nine male recreational runners (age = 22 ± 5 years; height = 175 ± 6 cm; weight = 68.0 ± 16.6 kg) underwent two test sessions: one was an incremental intensity protocol on an MT; the other was on an instrumented NMT. Intensity thresholds at $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ O2max, respiratory compensation point (iRCP), and lactate threshold (iLT) were registered for analysis, together with $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ ̇O2, $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ ̇E, ƒR, and blood lactate concentration ([Lac]). Comparisons were based on hypothesis testing (Student's T-test), effect sizes (Cohen's d), ICC, and Bland Altman analysis. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05. Attained $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ O2max (MT = 52.2 ± 7.3 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs NMT = 50.1 ± 8.1 mL·kg-1·min-1) and $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ ̇O2 at iRCP (MT = 46.3 ± 7.2 mL·kg-1·min-1 vs NMT = 42.8 ± 9.3 mL·kg-1·min-1) were not different between ergometers (p = 0.15 and 0.13, respectively), with significant ICCs (0.84 and 0.70, respectively) and Pearson’s correlations (r = 0.87 and 0.76, respectively). The [Lac] at iLT presented poor agreement between conditions. Significant correlations were found (r between 0.72 and 0.83) for relative power values of i $${\dot{\text V}}$$ V ˙ O2max (6.56 ± 1.28 W·kg−1), iRCP (4.38 ± 1.50 W·kg−1), and iLT (4.15 ± 1.29 W·kg−1) related to their counterpart obtained on MT. Results show that running on an NMT offers a higher glycolytic demand under the same relative internal load as running on an MT but with a similar aerobic response and correlated intensity determination.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13741-w
spellingShingle Filipe A. B. Sousa
Fúlvia B. Manchado-Gobatto
Natália de A. Rodrigues
Gustavo G. de Araujo
Claudio A. Gobatto
Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
Scientific Reports
title Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
title_full Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
title_fullStr Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
title_short Comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor-propelled treadmill at similar intensities
title_sort comparison of physiological responses of running on a nonmotorized and conventional motor propelled treadmill at similar intensities
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13741-w
work_keys_str_mv AT filipeabsousa comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofrunningonanonmotorizedandconventionalmotorpropelledtreadmillatsimilarintensities
AT fulviabmanchadogobatto comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofrunningonanonmotorizedandconventionalmotorpropelledtreadmillatsimilarintensities
AT nataliadearodrigues comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofrunningonanonmotorizedandconventionalmotorpropelledtreadmillatsimilarintensities
AT gustavogdearaujo comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofrunningonanonmotorizedandconventionalmotorpropelledtreadmillatsimilarintensities
AT claudioagobatto comparisonofphysiologicalresponsesofrunningonanonmotorizedandconventionalmotorpropelledtreadmillatsimilarintensities