Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis

Study DesignThis is a prospective study that was undertaken at a single centre and involved 80 consecutive patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).PurposeThe aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a qualitative grading system as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shardul Madhav Soman, Jimmy Chokshi, Naitik Chhatrala, Gulam Haider Tharadara, Mukund Prabhakar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2017-04-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-278.pdf
_version_ 1819105856558465024
author Shardul Madhav Soman
Jimmy Chokshi
Naitik Chhatrala
Gulam Haider Tharadara
Mukund Prabhakar
author_facet Shardul Madhav Soman
Jimmy Chokshi
Naitik Chhatrala
Gulam Haider Tharadara
Mukund Prabhakar
author_sort Shardul Madhav Soman
collection DOAJ
description Study DesignThis is a prospective study that was undertaken at a single centre and involved 80 consecutive patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).PurposeThe aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a qualitative grading system as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool in the management of multilevel LSS.Overview of LiteratureLSS diagnosis is clinical but is usually radiologically supplemented. However, there are often multilevel radiological findings with non-specific or atypical clinical features. We used a qualitative grading system to help in the decision-making process of the management of patients with multilevel LSS.Methods80 patients with LSS were treated with decompression and prospectively followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. All had failed conservative treatment. Qualitative grading of LSS severity was based on the dural sac in T2 weighted axial MRI images at all disc levels and was done from L1–2 to L5–S1 (n=400). Functional outcome was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI).ResultsThe mean patient age was 56.6 years, with a gender ratio of 0.6:1. Forty patients had degenerative LSS and 40 had degenerative spondylolysthesis. A total of 178 levels were decompressed, the majority of which were L4–L5 (43.82%), followed by L5–S1 (41.57%). According to our qualitative grading system, grade D stenosis (53.93%) was decompressed most frequently, followed by grade C stenosis (41.57%). The average preoperative ODI score was 58.55%, which later reduced to 19.15%. Seventy percent of patients achieved excellent results, whereas 30% achieved good results.ConclusionsMorphological grading is a useful tool in decision making in surgery for multilevel LSS. Grade C and D stenosis should be decompressed, whereas A and B should not be, unless clinically justified.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T02:28:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa44237443cf4a71be49cd76de40d771
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T02:28:54Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Korean Spine Society
record_format Article
series Asian Spine Journal
spelling doaj.art-aa44237443cf4a71be49cd76de40d7712022-12-21T18:41:57ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462017-04-0111227828410.4184/asj.2017.11.2.278217Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine StenosisShardul Madhav Soman0Jimmy Chokshi1Naitik Chhatrala2Gulam Haider Tharadara3Mukund Prabhakar4Department of Orthopaedics, Government Spine Institute and Paraplegia Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.Department of Orthopaedics, Government Spine Institute and Paraplegia Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.Department of Orthopaedics, BJ Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.Department of Orthopaedics, BJ Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.Department of Orthopaedics, BJ Medical College and Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.Study DesignThis is a prospective study that was undertaken at a single centre and involved 80 consecutive patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).PurposeThe aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of a qualitative grading system as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a tool in the management of multilevel LSS.Overview of LiteratureLSS diagnosis is clinical but is usually radiologically supplemented. However, there are often multilevel radiological findings with non-specific or atypical clinical features. We used a qualitative grading system to help in the decision-making process of the management of patients with multilevel LSS.Methods80 patients with LSS were treated with decompression and prospectively followed-up for a minimum of 12 months. All had failed conservative treatment. Qualitative grading of LSS severity was based on the dural sac in T2 weighted axial MRI images at all disc levels and was done from L1–2 to L5–S1 (n=400). Functional outcome was assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI).ResultsThe mean patient age was 56.6 years, with a gender ratio of 0.6:1. Forty patients had degenerative LSS and 40 had degenerative spondylolysthesis. A total of 178 levels were decompressed, the majority of which were L4–L5 (43.82%), followed by L5–S1 (41.57%). According to our qualitative grading system, grade D stenosis (53.93%) was decompressed most frequently, followed by grade C stenosis (41.57%). The average preoperative ODI score was 58.55%, which later reduced to 19.15%. Seventy percent of patients achieved excellent results, whereas 30% achieved good results.ConclusionsMorphological grading is a useful tool in decision making in surgery for multilevel LSS. Grade C and D stenosis should be decompressed, whereas A and B should not be, unless clinically justified.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-278.pdfDecompressionLumbar spinal stenosisMultilevelGrading
spellingShingle Shardul Madhav Soman
Jimmy Chokshi
Naitik Chhatrala
Gulam Haider Tharadara
Mukund Prabhakar
Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
Asian Spine Journal
Decompression
Lumbar spinal stenosis
Multilevel
Grading
title Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_full Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_fullStr Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_short Qualitative Grading as a Tool in the Management of Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
title_sort qualitative grading as a tool in the management of multilevel lumbar spine stenosis
topic Decompression
Lumbar spinal stenosis
Multilevel
Grading
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-11-278.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shardulmadhavsoman qualitativegradingasatoolinthemanagementofmultilevellumbarspinestenosis
AT jimmychokshi qualitativegradingasatoolinthemanagementofmultilevellumbarspinestenosis
AT naitikchhatrala qualitativegradingasatoolinthemanagementofmultilevellumbarspinestenosis
AT gulamhaidertharadara qualitativegradingasatoolinthemanagementofmultilevellumbarspinestenosis
AT mukundprabhakar qualitativegradingasatoolinthemanagementofmultilevellumbarspinestenosis