Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars
Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the microleakage of one high-viscosity conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) and a bulk-fill composite resin, in comparison to a resin-modified GIC in Class II restorations in primary molars. Materials and Method: Standardized Class II slot cavity preparatio...
Main Author: | Vellore Kannan Gopinath |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2017;volume=35;issue=3;spage=238;epage=243;aulast=Gopinath |
Similar Items
-
Comparative evaluation of the microleakage of two modified glass ionomer cements on primary molars. An in vivo study
by: Shaila Masih, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Microleakage Evaluation of a Hydroxyapatite Base in Comparison with a Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Vitro
by: Sepideh Banava, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01) -
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer and Glass Ionomer with Ethanolic Extract of Propolis – An In Vitro Study
by: Deepti V. Balehosur, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer®: A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement
by: Rawan Albeshti, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Comparative evaluation of microleakage in conventional glass ionomer cements and triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements
by: Rani Somani, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)