Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work

Abstract Background The aims of this study were: (1) to explore the frequency of discrepancies in work accommodations reported by workers and their supervisors, and (2) to investigate whether these discrepancies are associated with full return to work (RTW). Methods We used data from a longitudinal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joke Jansen, Nicole Snippen, Pierre Koning, Cécile Boot, Raun van Ooijen, Sandra Brouwer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15038-7
_version_ 1827982439770750976
author Joke Jansen
Nicole Snippen
Pierre Koning
Cécile Boot
Raun van Ooijen
Sandra Brouwer
author_facet Joke Jansen
Nicole Snippen
Pierre Koning
Cécile Boot
Raun van Ooijen
Sandra Brouwer
author_sort Joke Jansen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The aims of this study were: (1) to explore the frequency of discrepancies in work accommodations reported by workers and their supervisors, and (2) to investigate whether these discrepancies are associated with full return to work (RTW). Methods We used data from a longitudinal survey study of long-term sick-listed workers and their supervisors (n = 406). Discrepancies in reports on implementing eight types of work accommodations were explored. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to test associations between discrepancies in reported work accommodations and odds of full RTW 27 months after the sick-leave onset. Results Discrepancies were the lowest for the work accommodation therapeutic RTW (53%) and the highest (85%) for job training or education and reimbursement of therapy or treatment. Four out of eight types of work accommodations were more often reported by workers than by their supervisors. Only a discrepancy on a job reassignment within the organization was associated with lower odds of full RTW (OR 0.56, 95%-CI 0.36–0.88). Conclusion We found substantial discrepancies in the reported implementation of work accommodations between workers and their supervisors. Future research should focus on disentangling mechanisms that lead to discrepancies to avoid inefficiencies in the RTW process.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:34:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa4ce4ffb5f34fd3b0a9dc1f04631f02
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:34:09Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-aa4ce4ffb5f34fd3b0a9dc1f04631f022023-03-22T12:36:25ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582023-03-012311810.1186/s12889-023-15038-7Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to workJoke Jansen0Nicole Snippen1Pierre Koning2Cécile Boot3Raun van Ooijen4Sandra Brouwer5Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenDepartment of Economics, Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit AmsterdamDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenDepartment of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center GroningenAbstract Background The aims of this study were: (1) to explore the frequency of discrepancies in work accommodations reported by workers and their supervisors, and (2) to investigate whether these discrepancies are associated with full return to work (RTW). Methods We used data from a longitudinal survey study of long-term sick-listed workers and their supervisors (n = 406). Discrepancies in reports on implementing eight types of work accommodations were explored. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to test associations between discrepancies in reported work accommodations and odds of full RTW 27 months after the sick-leave onset. Results Discrepancies were the lowest for the work accommodation therapeutic RTW (53%) and the highest (85%) for job training or education and reimbursement of therapy or treatment. Four out of eight types of work accommodations were more often reported by workers than by their supervisors. Only a discrepancy on a job reassignment within the organization was associated with lower odds of full RTW (OR 0.56, 95%-CI 0.36–0.88). Conclusion We found substantial discrepancies in the reported implementation of work accommodations between workers and their supervisors. Future research should focus on disentangling mechanisms that lead to discrepancies to avoid inefficiencies in the RTW process.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15038-7Return to workPeople with disabilitiesLongitudinal survey
spellingShingle Joke Jansen
Nicole Snippen
Pierre Koning
Cécile Boot
Raun van Ooijen
Sandra Brouwer
Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
BMC Public Health
Return to work
People with disabilities
Longitudinal survey
title Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
title_full Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
title_fullStr Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
title_short Discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
title_sort discrepancies between workers with disabilities and their supervisors in reported work accommodations and associations with return to work
topic Return to work
People with disabilities
Longitudinal survey
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15038-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jokejansen discrepanciesbetweenworkerswithdisabilitiesandtheirsupervisorsinreportedworkaccommodationsandassociationswithreturntowork
AT nicolesnippen discrepanciesbetweenworkerswithdisabilitiesandtheirsupervisorsinreportedworkaccommodationsandassociationswithreturntowork
AT pierrekoning discrepanciesbetweenworkerswithdisabilitiesandtheirsupervisorsinreportedworkaccommodationsandassociationswithreturntowork
AT cecileboot discrepanciesbetweenworkerswithdisabilitiesandtheirsupervisorsinreportedworkaccommodationsandassociationswithreturntowork
AT raunvanooijen discrepanciesbetweenworkerswithdisabilitiesandtheirsupervisorsinreportedworkaccommodationsandassociationswithreturntowork
AT sandrabrouwer discrepanciesbetweenworkerswithdisabilitiesandtheirsupervisorsinreportedworkaccommodationsandassociationswithreturntowork