Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty
INTRODUCTION: Rhinoplasty, like other plastic surgery subspecialties, has greatly evolved in recent decades, as both a surgical technique and a diagnosis of the alterations that need to be performed. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of the structured and conventional s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/1810/en_v32n1a05.pdf |
_version_ | 1797419103174000640 |
---|---|
author | Paolo Rubez Rocha |
author_facet | Paolo Rubez Rocha |
author_sort | Paolo Rubez Rocha |
collection | DOAJ |
description | INTRODUCTION: Rhinoplasty, like other plastic surgery subspecialties, has greatly evolved in recent decades, as both a surgical technique and a diagnosis of the alterations that need to be performed. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of the structured and conventional surgical techniques on nasal aesthetic and corrective approaches.
METHODS: A total of 49 patients, who underwent surgical operation by the author of this work, were retrospectively studied. The patient generally underwent one of the two surgical techniques. The efficacy of each technique was evaluated by means of the critique provided by the patients and the surgeon regarding the results, and the ability to reach the pre-operative goals.
RESULTS: Both techniques were efficient in attaining the final objective of the surgery. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were similar in both cases, and there were no major complications in any of the groups.
CONCLUSION: The present work showed that both the structured and the conventional techniques were efficient in the treatment of nasal alterations. The most important factor for selecting the best approach in each case was the correct pre-operative diagnosis of the required alterations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:42:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-aa50fdf492a846309cd51f1c17d8cc76 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1983-5175 2177-1235 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T06:42:37Z |
publishDate | 2017-03-01 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica |
record_format | Article |
series | Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica |
spelling | doaj.art-aa50fdf492a846309cd51f1c17d8cc762023-12-03T10:45:34ZengSociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia PlásticaRevista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica1983-51752177-12352017-03-013201283610.5935/2177-1235.2017RBCP0005Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplastyPaolo Rubez Rocha0Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica, São Paulo, SP, BrazilINTRODUCTION: Rhinoplasty, like other plastic surgery subspecialties, has greatly evolved in recent decades, as both a surgical technique and a diagnosis of the alterations that need to be performed. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the efficacy of the structured and conventional surgical techniques on nasal aesthetic and corrective approaches. METHODS: A total of 49 patients, who underwent surgical operation by the author of this work, were retrospectively studied. The patient generally underwent one of the two surgical techniques. The efficacy of each technique was evaluated by means of the critique provided by the patients and the surgeon regarding the results, and the ability to reach the pre-operative goals. RESULTS: Both techniques were efficient in attaining the final objective of the surgery. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were similar in both cases, and there were no major complications in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: The present work showed that both the structured and the conventional techniques were efficient in the treatment of nasal alterations. The most important factor for selecting the best approach in each case was the correct pre-operative diagnosis of the required alterations.http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/1810/en_v32n1a05.pdfrhinoplastynasal cartilagesnosecostal cartilage |
spellingShingle | Paolo Rubez Rocha Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica rhinoplasty nasal cartilages nose costal cartilage |
title | Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty |
title_full | Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty |
title_short | Efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty |
title_sort | efficacy of structured and conventional techniques on aesthetic and corrective rhinoplasty |
topic | rhinoplasty nasal cartilages nose costal cartilage |
url | http://www.rbcp.org.br/export-pdf/1810/en_v32n1a05.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paolorubezrocha efficacyofstructuredandconventionaltechniquesonaestheticandcorrectiverhinoplasty |