Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison

Background. Currently, conventional radiography is still widely used to diagnose knee osteoarthritis and assess the grade according to Kallgren and Lawrence’s criteria. Ultrasound is a simple, inexpensive, noninvasive, and dynamic modality for evaluating femoral cartilage (FC) thickness. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rita Vivera Pane, Rahayu Setiyaningsih, Gunawan Widodo, Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al Hajiri, Juwita Raudlatul Salsabil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2023-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3942802
_version_ 1811158547073859584
author Rita Vivera Pane
Rahayu Setiyaningsih
Gunawan Widodo
Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al Hajiri
Juwita Raudlatul Salsabil
author_facet Rita Vivera Pane
Rahayu Setiyaningsih
Gunawan Widodo
Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al Hajiri
Juwita Raudlatul Salsabil
author_sort Rita Vivera Pane
collection DOAJ
description Background. Currently, conventional radiography is still widely used to diagnose knee osteoarthritis and assess the grade according to Kallgren and Lawrence’s criteria. Ultrasound is a simple, inexpensive, noninvasive, and dynamic modality for evaluating femoral cartilage (FC) thickness. This study aims to measure the FC thickness in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients and compare it to healthy adults using ultrasound assessment. Methods. An observational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of Hajj General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, from May to July 2022. Participants radiologically diagnosed with OA were included in the study and assigned to the OA group. Meanwhile, healthy adults without knee symptoms were included in the control group. FC thickness was measured using ultrasound scans at three sites: medial condyle (MC), intercondylar (IC), and lateral condyle (LC) on both sides of the knee. Results. The mean age in the OA and control groups was 61.03 ± 8.6 and 33.93 ± 14.7 years, respectively. Most participants in both groups were female. The OA group exhibited a thinner FC (1.49–1.63 mm) than the control group (1.68–1.87 mm). There was a significant difference in the mean of the right and left MC in both groups (p<0.05) but no significant difference in the IC and LC. Conclusion. OA patients exhibited a thinner FC than healthy adults in the control group. There was a significant difference in the mean thickness of the MC between groups.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T05:25:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa54ebfde3a0457e809a9075e7c3fb91
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1537-744X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T05:25:03Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Hindawi Limited
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj.art-aa54ebfde3a0457e809a9075e7c3fb912023-03-08T00:00:54ZengHindawi LimitedThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2023-01-01202310.1155/2023/3942802Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement ComparisonRita Vivera Pane0Rahayu Setiyaningsih1Gunawan Widodo2Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al Hajiri3Juwita Raudlatul Salsabil4Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDepartment of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationDepartment of Internal MedicineFaculty of MedicineResident of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationBackground. Currently, conventional radiography is still widely used to diagnose knee osteoarthritis and assess the grade according to Kallgren and Lawrence’s criteria. Ultrasound is a simple, inexpensive, noninvasive, and dynamic modality for evaluating femoral cartilage (FC) thickness. This study aims to measure the FC thickness in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients and compare it to healthy adults using ultrasound assessment. Methods. An observational study with a cross-sectional design was conducted at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of Hajj General Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, from May to July 2022. Participants radiologically diagnosed with OA were included in the study and assigned to the OA group. Meanwhile, healthy adults without knee symptoms were included in the control group. FC thickness was measured using ultrasound scans at three sites: medial condyle (MC), intercondylar (IC), and lateral condyle (LC) on both sides of the knee. Results. The mean age in the OA and control groups was 61.03 ± 8.6 and 33.93 ± 14.7 years, respectively. Most participants in both groups were female. The OA group exhibited a thinner FC (1.49–1.63 mm) than the control group (1.68–1.87 mm). There was a significant difference in the mean of the right and left MC in both groups (p<0.05) but no significant difference in the IC and LC. Conclusion. OA patients exhibited a thinner FC than healthy adults in the control group. There was a significant difference in the mean thickness of the MC between groups.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3942802
spellingShingle Rita Vivera Pane
Rahayu Setiyaningsih
Gunawan Widodo
Aufar Zimamuz Zaman Al Hajiri
Juwita Raudlatul Salsabil
Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison
The Scientific World Journal
title Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison
title_full Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison
title_fullStr Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison
title_full_unstemmed Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison
title_short Femoral Cartilage Thickness in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients and Healthy Adults: An Ultrasound Measurement Comparison
title_sort femoral cartilage thickness in knee osteoarthritis patients and healthy adults an ultrasound measurement comparison
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/3942802
work_keys_str_mv AT ritaviverapane femoralcartilagethicknessinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyadultsanultrasoundmeasurementcomparison
AT rahayusetiyaningsih femoralcartilagethicknessinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyadultsanultrasoundmeasurementcomparison
AT gunawanwidodo femoralcartilagethicknessinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyadultsanultrasoundmeasurementcomparison
AT aufarzimamuzzamanalhajiri femoralcartilagethicknessinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyadultsanultrasoundmeasurementcomparison
AT juwitaraudlatulsalsabil femoralcartilagethicknessinkneeosteoarthritispatientsandhealthyadultsanultrasoundmeasurementcomparison