Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial
Abstract Background Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiting vulnerable patient populations and clinicians having to deliver complex trial interventions successfully. Few studies have uti...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6 |
_version_ | 1818005810076188672 |
---|---|
author | Louisa Lawrie Eilidh M. Duncan Jan O. Jansen Marion K. Campbell Dan Brunsdon Zoë Skea Taylor Coffey Claire Cochran Katie Gillies |
author_facet | Louisa Lawrie Eilidh M. Duncan Jan O. Jansen Marion K. Campbell Dan Brunsdon Zoë Skea Taylor Coffey Claire Cochran Katie Gillies |
author_sort | Louisa Lawrie |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiting vulnerable patient populations and clinicians having to deliver complex trial interventions successfully. Few studies have utilised a behavioural framework to assess challenges and develop strategies for effective trial recruitment and delivery of trial interventions. This study reports the application of an innovative methodological approach to understand core trial processes, namely recruitment and intervention delivery, using a behavioural science approach to develop strategies designed to mitigate trial process problems. Methods The UK-REBOA trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (a novel intervention) in injured patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage. A behavioural investigation (‘diagnosis’) was conducted using theory-informed (Theoretical Domains Framework, TDF) semi-structured interviews with site staff from the UK-REBOA trial to examine trial processes which could be improved in relation to trial recruitment and delivery of the intervention. Interviews were analysed using the TDF to identify influences on behaviour, which were then mapped to techniques for behaviour change and developed into potential solutions. Results The behavioural diagnosis of the challenges experienced during trial processes highlighted factors relevant to a range of TDF domains: Skills, Environmental context and resources, Beliefs about capabilities, Beliefs about consequences, Social influences, and Memory, attention, and decision-making processes. Within the solution development phase, we identified 24 suitable behaviour change techniques that were developed into proposed solutions to target reported process problems with the aim of changing behaviour to improve recruitment and/or intervention delivery. Proposed solutions included targeted changes to trial training content, suggestions to restructure the environment (e.g. reinforced the purpose of the trial with information about the social and environmental consequences) and other strategies to reduce barriers to recruitment and intervention delivery. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a behavioural approach to investigate (‘diagnose’) behavioural trial process problems and subsequently develop and implement targeted solutions (‘treatment’) in an active trauma trial. Understanding the factors that affected behaviour, attitudes and beliefs in this trauma trial allowed us to implement theoretically informed, evidence-based solutions designed to enhance trial practices. Trial registration ISRCTN 16,184,981 |
first_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:50:21Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-aa57b686d3914267be7858ae8b8fad27 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1745-6215 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:50:21Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Trials |
spelling | doaj.art-aa57b686d3914267be7858ae8b8fad272022-12-22T02:11:18ZengBMCTrials1745-62152022-05-0123111610.1186/s13063-022-06341-6Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trialLouisa Lawrie0Eilidh M. Duncan1Jan O. Jansen2Marion K. Campbell3Dan Brunsdon4Zoë Skea5Taylor Coffey6Claire Cochran7Katie Gillies8Institute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit, 3Rd Floor Health Sciences Building, University of AberdeenAbstract Background Clinical trials comprise multiple processes at various stages of the trial lifecycle. These processes often involve complex behaviours such as recruiting vulnerable patient populations and clinicians having to deliver complex trial interventions successfully. Few studies have utilised a behavioural framework to assess challenges and develop strategies for effective trial recruitment and delivery of trial interventions. This study reports the application of an innovative methodological approach to understand core trial processes, namely recruitment and intervention delivery, using a behavioural science approach to develop strategies designed to mitigate trial process problems. Methods The UK-REBOA trial aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (a novel intervention) in injured patients with exsanguinating haemorrhage. A behavioural investigation (‘diagnosis’) was conducted using theory-informed (Theoretical Domains Framework, TDF) semi-structured interviews with site staff from the UK-REBOA trial to examine trial processes which could be improved in relation to trial recruitment and delivery of the intervention. Interviews were analysed using the TDF to identify influences on behaviour, which were then mapped to techniques for behaviour change and developed into potential solutions. Results The behavioural diagnosis of the challenges experienced during trial processes highlighted factors relevant to a range of TDF domains: Skills, Environmental context and resources, Beliefs about capabilities, Beliefs about consequences, Social influences, and Memory, attention, and decision-making processes. Within the solution development phase, we identified 24 suitable behaviour change techniques that were developed into proposed solutions to target reported process problems with the aim of changing behaviour to improve recruitment and/or intervention delivery. Proposed solutions included targeted changes to trial training content, suggestions to restructure the environment (e.g. reinforced the purpose of the trial with information about the social and environmental consequences) and other strategies to reduce barriers to recruitment and intervention delivery. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of applying a behavioural approach to investigate (‘diagnose’) behavioural trial process problems and subsequently develop and implement targeted solutions (‘treatment’) in an active trauma trial. Understanding the factors that affected behaviour, attitudes and beliefs in this trauma trial allowed us to implement theoretically informed, evidence-based solutions designed to enhance trial practices. Trial registration ISRCTN 16,184,981 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6Trial methodologyBehavioural scienceComplex interventionsProcess evaluationsTheoretical domains framework |
spellingShingle | Louisa Lawrie Eilidh M. Duncan Jan O. Jansen Marion K. Campbell Dan Brunsdon Zoë Skea Taylor Coffey Claire Cochran Katie Gillies Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial Trials Trial methodology Behavioural science Complex interventions Process evaluations Theoretical domains framework |
title | Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial |
title_full | Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial |
title_fullStr | Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial |
title_short | Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial |
title_sort | behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges case study in the uk reboa trial |
topic | Trial methodology Behavioural science Complex interventions Process evaluations Theoretical domains framework |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT louisalawrie behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT eilidhmduncan behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT janojansen behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT marionkcampbell behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT danbrunsdon behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT zoeskea behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT taylorcoffey behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT clairecochran behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial AT katiegillies behaviouraloptimisationtoaddresstrialconductchallengescasestudyintheukreboatrial |