Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study

Abstract Background This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare treatment results between bilateral extraction of upper second molars (M2) and first premolars (P1) in terms of treatment timing, cephalometry, upper third molar alignment and relapse in the long-term. Methods Fifty-three consecuti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eva Paddenberg, Maria Christina Braun, Peter Proff, Carsten Lippold, Christian Kirschneck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-03-01
Series:Head & Face Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00353-6
_version_ 1797863418159431680
author Eva Paddenberg
Maria Christina Braun
Peter Proff
Carsten Lippold
Christian Kirschneck
author_facet Eva Paddenberg
Maria Christina Braun
Peter Proff
Carsten Lippold
Christian Kirschneck
author_sort Eva Paddenberg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare treatment results between bilateral extraction of upper second molars (M2) and first premolars (P1) in terms of treatment timing, cephalometry, upper third molar alignment and relapse in the long-term. Methods Fifty-three consecutively treated Caucasian patients with a brachyfacial pattern, skeletal class I and dental class II requiring extraction in the maxilla due to crowding were retrospectively divided into group I (M2 extracted; N = 31) and II (P1 extracted; N = 22). Fixed appliances were inserted after extraction and after distalisation of the first molars in group I. Post-treatment lateral cephalograms were digitally analysed and compared between groups. Six to seven years later relapse and success of upper third molar alignment were clinically evaluated as well as orthodontic treatment duration, pre-treatment age and gender recorded. Results After debonding patients with second molar extraction showed significantly smaller values for the Wits-appraisal, but higher values for index and facial axis. Extracting first premolars caused significantly more retroinclination/−position of anterior teeth and an increased profile concavity, more relapse and less successful alignment of upper third molars. Orthodontic treatment duration, pre-treatment age and gender were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions Bilateral extraction of upper first premolars or second molars may solve dental crowding in skeletal class I dental class II patients with a brachyfacial growth pattern. Upper second molar extraction seems to affect maxillary third molar alignment, long-term stability and dental and soft-tissue cephalometric parameters positively, but no intervention proved to be clearly superior.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T22:36:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa5843b2632048d894eb8719d0c1dc63
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1746-160X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T22:36:19Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Head & Face Medicine
spelling doaj.art-aa5843b2632048d894eb8719d0c1dc632023-03-22T12:30:03ZengBMCHead & Face Medicine1746-160X2023-03-011911910.1186/s13005-023-00353-6Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective studyEva Paddenberg0Maria Christina Braun1Peter Proff2Carsten Lippold3Christian Kirschneck4Department of Orthodontics, University Hospital RegensburgDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital RegensburgDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital RegensburgDepartment of Orthodontics, University of MuensterDepartment of Orthodontics, University of MuensterAbstract Background This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare treatment results between bilateral extraction of upper second molars (M2) and first premolars (P1) in terms of treatment timing, cephalometry, upper third molar alignment and relapse in the long-term. Methods Fifty-three consecutively treated Caucasian patients with a brachyfacial pattern, skeletal class I and dental class II requiring extraction in the maxilla due to crowding were retrospectively divided into group I (M2 extracted; N = 31) and II (P1 extracted; N = 22). Fixed appliances were inserted after extraction and after distalisation of the first molars in group I. Post-treatment lateral cephalograms were digitally analysed and compared between groups. Six to seven years later relapse and success of upper third molar alignment were clinically evaluated as well as orthodontic treatment duration, pre-treatment age and gender recorded. Results After debonding patients with second molar extraction showed significantly smaller values for the Wits-appraisal, but higher values for index and facial axis. Extracting first premolars caused significantly more retroinclination/−position of anterior teeth and an increased profile concavity, more relapse and less successful alignment of upper third molars. Orthodontic treatment duration, pre-treatment age and gender were not significantly different between groups. Conclusions Bilateral extraction of upper first premolars or second molars may solve dental crowding in skeletal class I dental class II patients with a brachyfacial growth pattern. Upper second molar extraction seems to affect maxillary third molar alignment, long-term stability and dental and soft-tissue cephalometric parameters positively, but no intervention proved to be clearly superior.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00353-6ExtractionOrthodontic treatment resultsStabilitySkeletal class IAngle class IIBrachyfacial growth pattern
spellingShingle Eva Paddenberg
Maria Christina Braun
Peter Proff
Carsten Lippold
Christian Kirschneck
Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
Head & Face Medicine
Extraction
Orthodontic treatment results
Stability
Skeletal class I
Angle class II
Brachyfacial growth pattern
title Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
title_full Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
title_fullStr Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
title_short Comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class II malocclusion: a retrospective study
title_sort comparative treatment outcomes after bilateral extractions of maxillary second molars or first premolars in patients with class ii malocclusion a retrospective study
topic Extraction
Orthodontic treatment results
Stability
Skeletal class I
Angle class II
Brachyfacial growth pattern
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-023-00353-6
work_keys_str_mv AT evapaddenberg comparativetreatmentoutcomesafterbilateralextractionsofmaxillarysecondmolarsorfirstpremolarsinpatientswithclassiimalocclusionaretrospectivestudy
AT mariachristinabraun comparativetreatmentoutcomesafterbilateralextractionsofmaxillarysecondmolarsorfirstpremolarsinpatientswithclassiimalocclusionaretrospectivestudy
AT peterproff comparativetreatmentoutcomesafterbilateralextractionsofmaxillarysecondmolarsorfirstpremolarsinpatientswithclassiimalocclusionaretrospectivestudy
AT carstenlippold comparativetreatmentoutcomesafterbilateralextractionsofmaxillarysecondmolarsorfirstpremolarsinpatientswithclassiimalocclusionaretrospectivestudy
AT christiankirschneck comparativetreatmentoutcomesafterbilateralextractionsofmaxillarysecondmolarsorfirstpremolarsinpatientswithclassiimalocclusionaretrospectivestudy