Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters

People could behave in two different ways when engaging in interpersonal coordination activities: moving at the same frequency (isofrequency pattern, IP; the movement frequency ratio is 1:1) or at different frequencies (multifrequency pattern, MP; the movement frequency ratio is non 1:1). However, h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaojun Cheng, Yafeng Pan, Yinying Hu, Yi Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.01071/full
_version_ 1817980378230554624
author Xiaojun Cheng
Yafeng Pan
Yinying Hu
Yi Hu
author_facet Xiaojun Cheng
Yafeng Pan
Yinying Hu
Yi Hu
author_sort Xiaojun Cheng
collection DOAJ
description People could behave in two different ways when engaging in interpersonal coordination activities: moving at the same frequency (isofrequency pattern, IP; the movement frequency ratio is 1:1) or at different frequencies (multifrequency pattern, MP; the movement frequency ratio is non 1:1). However, how the interpersonal coordination pattern modulates coordination outcome and the related brain-to-brain connectivity is not fully understood. Here, we adopted a continuous joint drawing task in which two participants co-drew parallelogram shapes according to two coordination patterns (i.e., IP vs. MP) while their brain activities were simultaneously recorded by the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) based hyperscanning technique. Dyads showed better coordination performance, as well as relatively greater interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS) at the left frontopolar area, in the MP condition compared to the IP condition. Granger causality analyses further disclosed the bidirectional influences between the brains of the coordinating individuals. Such interpersonal influences were enhanced when individuals coordinated in the MP condition. Finally, the IBS during coordination was related to the dyadic self-control level. Taken together, our study revealed that interpersonal multifrequency coordination pattern facilitates the coordination efficiency, which was associated with the enhanced brain-to-brain connectivity. Our work also suggests the potentially positive role of self-control during the interpersonal coordination process.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T22:53:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa60b0d477a24f6f92ed3dffe47dd967
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T22:53:13Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-aa60b0d477a24f6f92ed3dffe47dd9672022-12-22T02:26:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2019-10-011310.3389/fnins.2019.01071465589Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio MattersXiaojun Cheng0Yafeng Pan1Yinying Hu2Yi Hu3School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, ChinaSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, ChinaSchool of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, ChinaPeople could behave in two different ways when engaging in interpersonal coordination activities: moving at the same frequency (isofrequency pattern, IP; the movement frequency ratio is 1:1) or at different frequencies (multifrequency pattern, MP; the movement frequency ratio is non 1:1). However, how the interpersonal coordination pattern modulates coordination outcome and the related brain-to-brain connectivity is not fully understood. Here, we adopted a continuous joint drawing task in which two participants co-drew parallelogram shapes according to two coordination patterns (i.e., IP vs. MP) while their brain activities were simultaneously recorded by the functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) based hyperscanning technique. Dyads showed better coordination performance, as well as relatively greater interpersonal brain synchronization (IBS) at the left frontopolar area, in the MP condition compared to the IP condition. Granger causality analyses further disclosed the bidirectional influences between the brains of the coordinating individuals. Such interpersonal influences were enhanced when individuals coordinated in the MP condition. Finally, the IBS during coordination was related to the dyadic self-control level. Taken together, our study revealed that interpersonal multifrequency coordination pattern facilitates the coordination efficiency, which was associated with the enhanced brain-to-brain connectivity. Our work also suggests the potentially positive role of self-control during the interpersonal coordination process.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.01071/fullinterpersonal brain synchronizationinterpersonal coordinationmultifrequency patternfNIRS-based hyperscanningfrontopolar
spellingShingle Xiaojun Cheng
Yafeng Pan
Yinying Hu
Yi Hu
Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters
Frontiers in Neuroscience
interpersonal brain synchronization
interpersonal coordination
multifrequency pattern
fNIRS-based hyperscanning
frontopolar
title Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters
title_full Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters
title_fullStr Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters
title_full_unstemmed Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters
title_short Coordination Elicits Synchronous Brain Activity Between Co-actors: Frequency Ratio Matters
title_sort coordination elicits synchronous brain activity between co actors frequency ratio matters
topic interpersonal brain synchronization
interpersonal coordination
multifrequency pattern
fNIRS-based hyperscanning
frontopolar
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2019.01071/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaojuncheng coordinationelicitssynchronousbrainactivitybetweencoactorsfrequencyratiomatters
AT yafengpan coordinationelicitssynchronousbrainactivitybetweencoactorsfrequencyratiomatters
AT yinyinghu coordinationelicitssynchronousbrainactivitybetweencoactorsfrequencyratiomatters
AT yihu coordinationelicitssynchronousbrainactivitybetweencoactorsfrequencyratiomatters