Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
Background Although spermatozoa delivers its RNA to oocytes at fertilization, its biological role is not well characterized. Our purpose was to identify the genes differentially and exclusively expressed in sperm samples both before and after the swim-up process in control donors and infertile males...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran
2010-10-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Fertility and Sterility |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijfs.ir/article_45807_2003aa8ed765523fc9e4b9370a91922c.pdf |
_version_ | 1819205143568056320 |
---|---|
author | Sandra García-Herrero Nicolás Garrido José Antonio Martínez-Conejero José Remohí Antonio Pellicer Marcos Meseguer |
author_facet | Sandra García-Herrero Nicolás Garrido José Antonio Martínez-Conejero José Remohí Antonio Pellicer Marcos Meseguer |
author_sort | Sandra García-Herrero |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background Although spermatozoa delivers its RNA to oocytes at fertilization, its biological role is not well characterized. Our purpose was to identify the genes differentially and exclusively expressed in sperm samples both before and after the swim-up process in control donors and infertile males with the purpose to identify their functional significance in male fertility. Materials and methods This was a nested case-control study. Ten sperm samples were obtained from infertile patients [n=5 (two aliquots each from five samples; one before the swim-up process and one after)] and donors [n=5 (two aliquots from five samples, one before the swim-up process and one after)]. Oligonucleotide microarrays were employed to study the genome-wide expression of pooled samples from infertile patients vs. donors. A total of four microarrays were perfomed: two with sperm sample aliquots before swim-up and two with sperm samples aliquots after swim-up, from both the case and control groups. The results were evaluated to detect which genes expressed differentially [fold change (FC)>5 and p <0.05] and which genes were exclusive to each of the groups, both before and after swim-up. Results Profound differences were detected between the fresh sperm samples of donors vs. infertile patients with respect to both differentially and exclusively expressed genes. Nevertheless these differences seemed to decrease after the swim-up selection process. Conclusion There are important differences between the expression profiles of sperm samples of fertile donors vs. infertile patients who require assisted reproduction techniques (ART). These differences are potential forecasters of fertility success, although their reliability needs to be explored further. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:47:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-aa6ca9e7f9af44f4bfd1219567bf6f31 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2008-076X 2008-0778 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-23T04:47:01Z |
publishDate | 2010-10-01 |
publisher | Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Fertility and Sterility |
spelling | doaj.art-aa6ca9e7f9af44f4bfd1219567bf6f312022-12-21T17:59:36ZengRoyan Institute (ACECR), TehranInternational Journal of Fertility and Sterility2008-076X2008-07782010-10-014311412110.22074/ijfs.2010.4580745807Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation TechniqueSandra García-Herrero0Nicolás Garrido1José Antonio Martínez-Conejero2José Remohí3Antonio Pellicer4Marcos Meseguer5Valencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainBackground Although spermatozoa delivers its RNA to oocytes at fertilization, its biological role is not well characterized. Our purpose was to identify the genes differentially and exclusively expressed in sperm samples both before and after the swim-up process in control donors and infertile males with the purpose to identify their functional significance in male fertility. Materials and methods This was a nested case-control study. Ten sperm samples were obtained from infertile patients [n=5 (two aliquots each from five samples; one before the swim-up process and one after)] and donors [n=5 (two aliquots from five samples, one before the swim-up process and one after)]. Oligonucleotide microarrays were employed to study the genome-wide expression of pooled samples from infertile patients vs. donors. A total of four microarrays were perfomed: two with sperm sample aliquots before swim-up and two with sperm samples aliquots after swim-up, from both the case and control groups. The results were evaluated to detect which genes expressed differentially [fold change (FC)>5 and p <0.05] and which genes were exclusive to each of the groups, both before and after swim-up. Results Profound differences were detected between the fresh sperm samples of donors vs. infertile patients with respect to both differentially and exclusively expressed genes. Nevertheless these differences seemed to decrease after the swim-up selection process. Conclusion There are important differences between the expression profiles of sperm samples of fertile donors vs. infertile patients who require assisted reproduction techniques (ART). These differences are potential forecasters of fertility success, although their reliability needs to be explored further.http://www.ijfs.ir/article_45807_2003aa8ed765523fc9e4b9370a91922c.pdfgene expressioninfertilitymicroarray analysisspermatozoa |
spellingShingle | Sandra García-Herrero Nicolás Garrido José Antonio Martínez-Conejero José Remohí Antonio Pellicer Marcos Meseguer Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique International Journal of Fertility and Sterility gene expression infertility microarray analysis spermatozoa |
title | Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique |
title_full | Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique |
title_fullStr | Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique |
title_short | Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique |
title_sort | profound transcriptomic differences found between sperm samples from sperm donors vs patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques tends to disappear after swim up sperm preparation technique |
topic | gene expression infertility microarray analysis spermatozoa |
url | http://www.ijfs.ir/article_45807_2003aa8ed765523fc9e4b9370a91922c.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandragarciaherrero profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique AT nicolasgarrido profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique AT joseantoniomartinezconejero profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique AT joseremohi profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique AT antoniopellicer profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique AT marcosmeseguer profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique |