Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique

Background Although spermatozoa delivers its RNA to oocytes at fertilization, its biological role is not well characterized. Our purpose was to identify the genes differentially and exclusively expressed in sperm samples both before and after the swim-up process in control donors and infertile males...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sandra García-Herrero, Nicolás Garrido, José Antonio Martínez-Conejero, José Remohí, Antonio Pellicer, Marcos Meseguer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran 2010-10-01
Series:International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijfs.ir/article_45807_2003aa8ed765523fc9e4b9370a91922c.pdf
_version_ 1819205143568056320
author Sandra García-Herrero
Nicolás Garrido
José Antonio Martínez-Conejero
José Remohí
Antonio Pellicer
Marcos Meseguer
author_facet Sandra García-Herrero
Nicolás Garrido
José Antonio Martínez-Conejero
José Remohí
Antonio Pellicer
Marcos Meseguer
author_sort Sandra García-Herrero
collection DOAJ
description Background Although spermatozoa delivers its RNA to oocytes at fertilization, its biological role is not well characterized. Our purpose was to identify the genes differentially and exclusively expressed in sperm samples both before and after the swim-up process in control donors and infertile males with the purpose to identify their functional significance in male fertility. Materials and methods This was a nested case-control study. Ten sperm samples were obtained from infertile patients [n=5 (two aliquots each from five samples; one before the swim-up process and one after)] and donors [n=5 (two aliquots from five samples, one before the swim-up process and one after)]. Oligonucleotide microarrays were employed to study the genome-wide expression of pooled samples from infertile patients vs. donors. A total of four microarrays were perfomed: two with sperm sample aliquots before swim-up and two with sperm samples aliquots after swim-up, from both the case and control groups. The results were evaluated to detect which genes expressed differentially [fold change (FC)>5 and p <0.05] and which genes were exclusive to each of the groups, both before and after swim-up. Results Profound differences were detected between the fresh sperm samples of donors vs. infertile patients with respect to both differentially and exclusively expressed genes. Nevertheless these differences seemed to decrease after the swim-up selection process. Conclusion There are important differences between the expression profiles of sperm samples of fertile donors vs. infertile patients who require assisted reproduction techniques (ART). These differences are potential forecasters of fertility success, although their reliability needs to be explored further.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T04:47:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa6ca9e7f9af44f4bfd1219567bf6f31
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-076X
2008-0778
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T04:47:01Z
publishDate 2010-10-01
publisher Royan Institute (ACECR), Tehran
record_format Article
series International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
spelling doaj.art-aa6ca9e7f9af44f4bfd1219567bf6f312022-12-21T17:59:36ZengRoyan Institute (ACECR), TehranInternational Journal of Fertility and Sterility2008-076X2008-07782010-10-014311412110.22074/ijfs.2010.4580745807Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation TechniqueSandra García-Herrero0Nicolás Garrido1José Antonio Martínez-Conejero2José Remohí3Antonio Pellicer4Marcos Meseguer5Valencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainValencian Infertility Institute (IVI), Valencia University, Valencia, SpainBackground Although spermatozoa delivers its RNA to oocytes at fertilization, its biological role is not well characterized. Our purpose was to identify the genes differentially and exclusively expressed in sperm samples both before and after the swim-up process in control donors and infertile males with the purpose to identify their functional significance in male fertility. Materials and methods This was a nested case-control study. Ten sperm samples were obtained from infertile patients [n=5 (two aliquots each from five samples; one before the swim-up process and one after)] and donors [n=5 (two aliquots from five samples, one before the swim-up process and one after)]. Oligonucleotide microarrays were employed to study the genome-wide expression of pooled samples from infertile patients vs. donors. A total of four microarrays were perfomed: two with sperm sample aliquots before swim-up and two with sperm samples aliquots after swim-up, from both the case and control groups. The results were evaluated to detect which genes expressed differentially [fold change (FC)>5 and p <0.05] and which genes were exclusive to each of the groups, both before and after swim-up. Results Profound differences were detected between the fresh sperm samples of donors vs. infertile patients with respect to both differentially and exclusively expressed genes. Nevertheless these differences seemed to decrease after the swim-up selection process. Conclusion There are important differences between the expression profiles of sperm samples of fertile donors vs. infertile patients who require assisted reproduction techniques (ART). These differences are potential forecasters of fertility success, although their reliability needs to be explored further.http://www.ijfs.ir/article_45807_2003aa8ed765523fc9e4b9370a91922c.pdfgene expressioninfertilitymicroarray analysisspermatozoa
spellingShingle Sandra García-Herrero
Nicolás Garrido
José Antonio Martínez-Conejero
José Remohí
Antonio Pellicer
Marcos Meseguer
Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
International Journal of Fertility and Sterility
gene expression
infertility
microarray analysis
spermatozoa
title Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
title_full Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
title_fullStr Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
title_full_unstemmed Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
title_short Profound Transcriptomic Differences Found between Sperm Samples from Sperm Donors vs. Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Techniques Tends to Disappear after Swim-up Sperm Preparation Technique
title_sort profound transcriptomic differences found between sperm samples from sperm donors vs patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques tends to disappear after swim up sperm preparation technique
topic gene expression
infertility
microarray analysis
spermatozoa
url http://www.ijfs.ir/article_45807_2003aa8ed765523fc9e4b9370a91922c.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sandragarciaherrero profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique
AT nicolasgarrido profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique
AT joseantoniomartinezconejero profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique
AT joseremohi profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique
AT antoniopellicer profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique
AT marcosmeseguer profoundtranscriptomicdifferencesfoundbetweenspermsamplesfromspermdonorsvspatientsundergoingassistedreproductiontechniquestendstodisappearafterswimupspermpreparationtechnique