Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity

Abstract Background This study analyses vaccine coverage and equity among children under five years of age in Uganda based on the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) dataset. Understanding equity in vaccine access and the determinants is crucial for the redress of emerging as well as pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony Ssebagereka, Gatien de Broucker, Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho, Rornald Muhumuza Kananura, Alfred Driwale, Joshua Mak, Aloysius Mutebi, Bryan Nicholas Patenaude
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17592-6
_version_ 1797349666003615744
author Anthony Ssebagereka
Gatien de Broucker
Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura
Alfred Driwale
Joshua Mak
Aloysius Mutebi
Bryan Nicholas Patenaude
author_facet Anthony Ssebagereka
Gatien de Broucker
Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura
Alfred Driwale
Joshua Mak
Aloysius Mutebi
Bryan Nicholas Patenaude
author_sort Anthony Ssebagereka
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study analyses vaccine coverage and equity among children under five years of age in Uganda based on the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) dataset. Understanding equity in vaccine access and the determinants is crucial for the redress of emerging as well as persistent inequities. Methods Applied to the UDHS for 2000, 2006, 2011, and 2016, the Vaccine Economics Research for Sustainability and Equity (VERSE) Equity Toolkit provides a multivariate assessment of immunization coverage and equity by (1) ranking the sample population with a composite direct unfairness index, (2) generating quantitative measure of efficiency (coverage) and equity, and (3) decomposing inequity into its contributing factors. The direct unfairness ranking variable is the predicted vaccination coverage from a logistic model based upon fair and unfair sources of variation in vaccination coverage. Our fair source of variation is defined as the child’s age – children too young to receive routine immunization are not expected to be vaccinated. Unfair sources of variation are the child’s region of residence, and whether they live in an urban or rural area, the mother’s education level, the household’s socioeconomic status, the child’s sex, and their insurance coverage status. For each unfair source of variation, we identify a “more privileged” situation. Results The coverage and equity of the Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus vaccine, 3rd dose (DPT3) and the Measles-Containing Vaccine, 1st dose (MCV1) – two vaccines indicative of the health system’s performance – improved significantly since 2000, from 49.7% to 76.8% and 67.8% to 82.7%, respectively, and there are fewer zero-dose children: from 8.4% to 2.2%. Improvements in retaining children in the program so that they complete the immunization schedule are more modest (from 38.1% to 40.8%). Progress in coverage was pro-poor, with concentration indices (wealth only) moving from 0.127 (DPT3) and 0.123 (MCV1) in 2000 to -0.042 and -0.029 in 2016. Gains in overall equity (composite) were more modest, albeit significant for most vaccines except for MCV1: concentration indices of 0.150 (DPT3) and 0.087 (MCV1) in 2000 and 0.054 and 0.055 in 2016. The influence of the region and settings (urban/rural) of residence significantly decreased since 2000. Conclusion The past two decades have seen significant improvements in vaccine coverage and equity, thanks to the efforts to strengthen routine immunization and ongoing supplemental immunization activities such as the Family Health Days. While maintaining the regular provision of vaccines to all regions, efforts should be made to alleviate the impact of low maternal education and literacy on vaccination uptake.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T12:33:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa7254d6ec5141408d59512aadd2e0bd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T12:33:41Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-aa7254d6ec5141408d59512aadd2e0bd2024-01-21T12:38:24ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582024-01-0124111310.1186/s12889-023-17592-6Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequityAnthony Ssebagereka0Gatien de Broucker1Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho2Rornald Muhumuza Kananura3Alfred Driwale4Joshua Mak5Aloysius Mutebi6Bryan Nicholas Patenaude7Makerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthMakerere University School of Public HealthMakerere University School of Public HealthUganda National Expanded Program On Immunization (UNEPI), Ministry of HealthDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthMakerere University School of Public HealthDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthAbstract Background This study analyses vaccine coverage and equity among children under five years of age in Uganda based on the 2016 Uganda Demographic and Health Survey (UDHS) dataset. Understanding equity in vaccine access and the determinants is crucial for the redress of emerging as well as persistent inequities. Methods Applied to the UDHS for 2000, 2006, 2011, and 2016, the Vaccine Economics Research for Sustainability and Equity (VERSE) Equity Toolkit provides a multivariate assessment of immunization coverage and equity by (1) ranking the sample population with a composite direct unfairness index, (2) generating quantitative measure of efficiency (coverage) and equity, and (3) decomposing inequity into its contributing factors. The direct unfairness ranking variable is the predicted vaccination coverage from a logistic model based upon fair and unfair sources of variation in vaccination coverage. Our fair source of variation is defined as the child’s age – children too young to receive routine immunization are not expected to be vaccinated. Unfair sources of variation are the child’s region of residence, and whether they live in an urban or rural area, the mother’s education level, the household’s socioeconomic status, the child’s sex, and their insurance coverage status. For each unfair source of variation, we identify a “more privileged” situation. Results The coverage and equity of the Diphtheria-Pertussis-Tetanus vaccine, 3rd dose (DPT3) and the Measles-Containing Vaccine, 1st dose (MCV1) – two vaccines indicative of the health system’s performance – improved significantly since 2000, from 49.7% to 76.8% and 67.8% to 82.7%, respectively, and there are fewer zero-dose children: from 8.4% to 2.2%. Improvements in retaining children in the program so that they complete the immunization schedule are more modest (from 38.1% to 40.8%). Progress in coverage was pro-poor, with concentration indices (wealth only) moving from 0.127 (DPT3) and 0.123 (MCV1) in 2000 to -0.042 and -0.029 in 2016. Gains in overall equity (composite) were more modest, albeit significant for most vaccines except for MCV1: concentration indices of 0.150 (DPT3) and 0.087 (MCV1) in 2000 and 0.054 and 0.055 in 2016. The influence of the region and settings (urban/rural) of residence significantly decreased since 2000. Conclusion The past two decades have seen significant improvements in vaccine coverage and equity, thanks to the efforts to strengthen routine immunization and ongoing supplemental immunization activities such as the Family Health Days. While maintaining the regular provision of vaccines to all regions, efforts should be made to alleviate the impact of low maternal education and literacy on vaccination uptake.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17592-6Vaccine equityVaccine coverageVaccine deliveryAccess to healthcareUgandaDeterminants of health
spellingShingle Anthony Ssebagereka
Gatien de Broucker
Elizabeth Ekirapa-Kiracho
Rornald Muhumuza Kananura
Alfred Driwale
Joshua Mak
Aloysius Mutebi
Bryan Nicholas Patenaude
Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
BMC Public Health
Vaccine equity
Vaccine coverage
Vaccine delivery
Access to healthcare
Uganda
Determinants of health
title Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
title_full Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
title_fullStr Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
title_full_unstemmed Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
title_short Equity in vaccine coverage in Uganda from 2000 to 2016: revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
title_sort equity in vaccine coverage in uganda from 2000 to 2016 revealing the multifaceted nature of inequity
topic Vaccine equity
Vaccine coverage
Vaccine delivery
Access to healthcare
Uganda
Determinants of health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-17592-6
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonyssebagereka equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT gatiendebroucker equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT elizabethekirapakiracho equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT rornaldmuhumuzakananura equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT alfreddriwale equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT joshuamak equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT aloysiusmutebi equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity
AT bryannicholaspatenaude equityinvaccinecoverageinugandafrom2000to2016revealingthemultifacetednatureofinequity