Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi

Objective: To compare upper versus lower calyceal approaches in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing renal calculi. Method: The retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, The Kidney Centre Post-Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, and comprised data of patients who unde...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Waqar Ahmed Memon, Salman El Khalid, Ali Haider, Sherjeel Saulat, Shariq Anis Khan, Muhammad Bilal Quddus, Khadijah Abid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pakistan Medical Association 2020-11-01
Series:Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
Online Access:https://www.ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/1988
_version_ 1797820602476658688
author Waqar Ahmed Memon
Salman El Khalid
Ali Haider
Sherjeel Saulat
Shariq Anis Khan
Muhammad Bilal Quddus
Khadijah Abid
author_facet Waqar Ahmed Memon
Salman El Khalid
Ali Haider
Sherjeel Saulat
Shariq Anis Khan
Muhammad Bilal Quddus
Khadijah Abid
author_sort Waqar Ahmed Memon
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To compare upper versus lower calyceal approaches in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing renal calculi. Method: The retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, The Kidney Centre Post-Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, and comprised data of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2014 to January 2015. Patients were divided into upper pole puncture group A and lower pole puncture group B. Data was analysed using SPSS 17. Results: Of the 198 patients, 147(74.2%) were males and 51(25.8%) were females. The overall mean age was 40.64±14.02 years. Of the total, 69(34.84%) were in group A and 129(65.15%) were in group B. Inter-group difference was significant in pre- and post-operative haemoglobin (p<0.05). Post-operative outcomes showed that blood transfusion, stone clearance and complication like tube thoracostomy had significant association with both the groups (p<0.05). Complete clearance was seen in 152(76.8%) patients; 40(74.1%) in group A and 102(81.6%) in group B. Conclusion: The success rate was found to be better in lower calyceal puncture group than upper calyceal puncture group for the management of renal calculi. Key Words: Upper and lower calyceal approach, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Continuous....
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:40:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa740398b8dc4c28a32ff1b264760b0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-9982
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:40:44Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher Pakistan Medical Association
record_format Article
series Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
spelling doaj.art-aa740398b8dc4c28a32ff1b264760b0a2023-05-25T04:25:04ZengPakistan Medical AssociationJournal of the Pakistan Medical Association0030-99822020-11-0171210.47391/JPMA.461Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculiWaqar Ahmed Memon0Salman El Khalid1Ali Haider 2Sherjeel Saulat3Shariq Anis Khan 4Muhammad Bilal Quddus 5Khadijah Abid 6Liaquat University of Medical and Health Sciences, Karachi, PakistanThe Kidney Center Post Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, PakistanHamdard University Hospital. Karachi, PakistanTabba Kidney Institute Post Graduate, Training & Research Center, Karachi, PakistanThe Kidney Center Post Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, PakistanVictoria Hospital BlackpoolCollege of Physicians and Surgeons, Karachi, Pakistan Objective: To compare upper versus lower calyceal approaches in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for managing renal calculi. Method: The retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, The Kidney Centre Post-Graduate Training Institute, Karachi, and comprised data of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from January 2014 to January 2015. Patients were divided into upper pole puncture group A and lower pole puncture group B. Data was analysed using SPSS 17. Results: Of the 198 patients, 147(74.2%) were males and 51(25.8%) were females. The overall mean age was 40.64±14.02 years. Of the total, 69(34.84%) were in group A and 129(65.15%) were in group B. Inter-group difference was significant in pre- and post-operative haemoglobin (p<0.05). Post-operative outcomes showed that blood transfusion, stone clearance and complication like tube thoracostomy had significant association with both the groups (p<0.05). Complete clearance was seen in 152(76.8%) patients; 40(74.1%) in group A and 102(81.6%) in group B. Conclusion: The success rate was found to be better in lower calyceal puncture group than upper calyceal puncture group for the management of renal calculi. Key Words: Upper and lower calyceal approach, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Continuous.... https://www.ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/1988
spellingShingle Waqar Ahmed Memon
Salman El Khalid
Ali Haider
Sherjeel Saulat
Shariq Anis Khan
Muhammad Bilal Quddus
Khadijah Abid
Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association
title Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
title_full Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
title_short Comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (1) for managing renal calculi
title_sort comparative evaluation of upper versus lower calyceal approach in percutaneous nephrolithotomy 1 for managing renal calculi
url https://www.ojs.jpma.org.pk/index.php/public_html/article/view/1988
work_keys_str_mv AT waqarahmedmemon comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi
AT salmanelkhalid comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi
AT alihaider comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi
AT sherjeelsaulat comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi
AT shariqaniskhan comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi
AT muhammadbilalquddus comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi
AT khadijahabid comparativeevaluationofupperversuslowercalycealapproachinpercutaneousnephrolithotomy1formanagingrenalcalculi