Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison
The last part of the 19th century saw a general reaction against the mythological bias in previous studies and a greater emphasis on ritualistic aspects of religion. Wilhelm Mannhardt and Jane Harrison played important roles in this development. My argument is that their background in folklore and a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Danish |
Published: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift
2001-02-01
|
Series: | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2626 |
_version_ | 1797360746882924544 |
---|---|
author | Tove Tybjerg |
author_facet | Tove Tybjerg |
author_sort | Tove Tybjerg |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The last part of the 19th century saw a general reaction against the mythological bias in previous studies and a greater emphasis on ritualistic aspects of religion. Wilhelm Mannhardt and Jane Harrison played important roles in this development. My argument is that their background in folklore and archaeology was important for their contributions to the study of the myth-ritual complex. More specifically, I focus on the importance of Mannhardt's questionnaire and on Harrison's teaching habits and extensive use of pictures. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:44:07Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-aa7d611afe31432a86e6ffda832facd0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1904-8181 |
language | Danish |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:44:07Z |
publishDate | 2001-02-01 |
publisher | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
record_format | Article |
series | Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift |
spelling | doaj.art-aa7d611afe31432a86e6ffda832facd02024-01-09T13:39:45ZdanReligionsvidenskabeligt TidsskriftReligionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift1904-81812001-02-013810.7146/rt.v0i38.2626Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen HarrisonTove TybjergThe last part of the 19th century saw a general reaction against the mythological bias in previous studies and a greater emphasis on ritualistic aspects of religion. Wilhelm Mannhardt and Jane Harrison played important roles in this development. My argument is that their background in folklore and archaeology was important for their contributions to the study of the myth-ritual complex. More specifically, I focus on the importance of Mannhardt's questionnaire and on Harrison's teaching habits and extensive use of pictures.https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2626Wilhelm MannhardtJane HarrisonMyterRitualer |
spellingShingle | Tove Tybjerg Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison Religionsvidenskabeligt Tidsskrift Wilhelm Mannhardt Jane Harrison Myter Ritualer |
title | Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison |
title_full | Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison |
title_fullStr | Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison |
title_full_unstemmed | Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison |
title_short | Myter, ritualer og videnskaber: Wilhelm Mannhardt og Jane Ellen Harrison |
title_sort | myter ritualer og videnskaber wilhelm mannhardt og jane ellen harrison |
topic | Wilhelm Mannhardt Jane Harrison Myter Ritualer |
url | https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tovetybjerg myterritualerogvidenskaberwilhelmmannhardtogjaneellenharrison |