Technology Refusal

Analyses of the deployment of technology in schools usually note its lack of impact on the day-to-day values and practices of teachers, administrators, and students. This is generally construed as an implementation failure, or as resulting from a temperamental shortcoming on the part of teachers or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steven Hodas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 1993-09-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/687
_version_ 1818664000095780864
author Steven Hodas
author_facet Steven Hodas
author_sort Steven Hodas
collection DOAJ
description Analyses of the deployment of technology in schools usually note its lack of impact on the day-to-day values and practices of teachers, administrators, and students. This is generally construed as an implementation failure, or as resulting from a temperamental shortcoming on the part of teachers or technologists. It is predicated on the tacit assumption that the technology itself is value-free. This paper proposes that technology is never neutral: that its values and practices must always either support or subvert those of the organization into which it is placed; and that the failures of technology to alter the look-and-feel of schools more generally results from a mismatch between the values of school organization and those embedded within the contested technology.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T05:25:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aa85767df4d1468fbfeddb8f3d0e7c9b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1068-2341
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T05:25:47Z
publishDate 1993-09-01
publisher Arizona State University
record_format Article
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
spelling doaj.art-aa85767df4d1468fbfeddb8f3d0e7c9b2022-12-21T22:01:52ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23411993-09-01110Technology RefusalSteven HodasAnalyses of the deployment of technology in schools usually note its lack of impact on the day-to-day values and practices of teachers, administrators, and students. This is generally construed as an implementation failure, or as resulting from a temperamental shortcoming on the part of teachers or technologists. It is predicated on the tacit assumption that the technology itself is value-free. This paper proposes that technology is never neutral: that its values and practices must always either support or subvert those of the organization into which it is placed; and that the failures of technology to alter the look-and-feel of schools more generally results from a mismatch between the values of school organization and those embedded within the contested technology.http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/687
spellingShingle Steven Hodas
Technology Refusal
Education Policy Analysis Archives
title Technology Refusal
title_full Technology Refusal
title_fullStr Technology Refusal
title_full_unstemmed Technology Refusal
title_short Technology Refusal
title_sort technology refusal
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/687
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenhodas technologyrefusal