Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation.
<h4>Objectives</h4>Bone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200475 |
| _version_ | 1818575564700647424 |
|---|---|
| author | Oliver R Boughton Shaocheng Ma Sarah Zhao Matthew Arnold Angus Lewis Ulrich Hansen Justin P Cobb Finn Giuliani Richard L Abel |
| author_facet | Oliver R Boughton Shaocheng Ma Sarah Zhao Matthew Arnold Angus Lewis Ulrich Hansen Justin P Cobb Finn Giuliani Richard L Abel |
| author_sort | Oliver R Boughton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Objectives</h4>Bone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale of metric used. The scale used should reflect the clinical problem, whether it is fracture risk, a whole bone problem, or implant stability, at the millimetre-scale. Indentation, an engineering technique involving pressing a hard-tipped material into another material with a known force, may be able to assess bone stiffness at the millimetre-scale (the apparent elastic modulus). We aimed to investigate whether spherical-tip indentation could reliably measure the apparent elastic modulus of human cortical bone.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Cortical bone samples were retrieved from the femoral necks of nineteen patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery (10 females, 9 males, mean age: 69 years). The samples underwent indentation using a 1.5 mm diameter, ruby, spherical indenter tip, with sixty indentations per patient sample, across six locations on the bone surfaces, with ten repeated indentations at each of the six locations. The samples then underwent mechanical compression testing. The repeatability of indentation measurements of elastic modulus was assessed using the co-efficient of repeatability and the correlation between the bone elastic modulus measured by indentation and compression testing was analysed by least-squares regression.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 1140 indentations in total were performed. Indentation was found to be repeatable for indentations performed at the same locations on the bone samples with a mean co-efficient of repeatability of 0.4 GigaPascals (GPa), confidence interval (C.I): 0.33-0.42 GPa. There was variation in the indentation modulus results between different locations on the bone samples (mean co-efficient of repeatability: 3.1 GPa, C.I: 2.2-3.90 GPa). No clear correlation was observed between indentation and compression values of bone elastic modulus (r = 0.33, p = 0.17). The mean apparent elastic modulus obtained by spherical indentation was 9.9 GPa, the standard deviation for each indent cycle was 0.11 GPa, and the standard deviation between locations on the same sample was 1.01 GPa. The mean compression apparent elastic modulus was 4.42 GPa, standard deviation 1.02 GPa.<h4>Discussion</h4>Spherical-tip indentation was found to be a repeatable test for measuring the elastic modulus of human cortical bone, demonstrated by a low co-efficient of repeatability in this study. It could not, however, reliably predict cortical bone elastic modulus determined by platens compression testing in this study. This may be due to indentation only probing mechanical properties at the micro-scale while platens compression testing assesses millimetre length-scale properties. Improvements to the testing technique, including the use of a larger diameter spherical indenter tip, may improve the measurement of bone stiffness at the millimetre scale and should be investigated further. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-15T00:42:42Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-aa9c4c81ec244d17b50bca20932dee06 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-15T00:42:42Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-aa9c4c81ec244d17b50bca20932dee062022-12-21T22:41:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01137e020047510.1371/journal.pone.0200475Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation.Oliver R BoughtonShaocheng MaSarah ZhaoMatthew ArnoldAngus LewisUlrich HansenJustin P CobbFinn GiulianiRichard L Abel<h4>Objectives</h4>Bone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale of metric used. The scale used should reflect the clinical problem, whether it is fracture risk, a whole bone problem, or implant stability, at the millimetre-scale. Indentation, an engineering technique involving pressing a hard-tipped material into another material with a known force, may be able to assess bone stiffness at the millimetre-scale (the apparent elastic modulus). We aimed to investigate whether spherical-tip indentation could reliably measure the apparent elastic modulus of human cortical bone.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Cortical bone samples were retrieved from the femoral necks of nineteen patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery (10 females, 9 males, mean age: 69 years). The samples underwent indentation using a 1.5 mm diameter, ruby, spherical indenter tip, with sixty indentations per patient sample, across six locations on the bone surfaces, with ten repeated indentations at each of the six locations. The samples then underwent mechanical compression testing. The repeatability of indentation measurements of elastic modulus was assessed using the co-efficient of repeatability and the correlation between the bone elastic modulus measured by indentation and compression testing was analysed by least-squares regression.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 1140 indentations in total were performed. Indentation was found to be repeatable for indentations performed at the same locations on the bone samples with a mean co-efficient of repeatability of 0.4 GigaPascals (GPa), confidence interval (C.I): 0.33-0.42 GPa. There was variation in the indentation modulus results between different locations on the bone samples (mean co-efficient of repeatability: 3.1 GPa, C.I: 2.2-3.90 GPa). No clear correlation was observed between indentation and compression values of bone elastic modulus (r = 0.33, p = 0.17). The mean apparent elastic modulus obtained by spherical indentation was 9.9 GPa, the standard deviation for each indent cycle was 0.11 GPa, and the standard deviation between locations on the same sample was 1.01 GPa. The mean compression apparent elastic modulus was 4.42 GPa, standard deviation 1.02 GPa.<h4>Discussion</h4>Spherical-tip indentation was found to be a repeatable test for measuring the elastic modulus of human cortical bone, demonstrated by a low co-efficient of repeatability in this study. It could not, however, reliably predict cortical bone elastic modulus determined by platens compression testing in this study. This may be due to indentation only probing mechanical properties at the micro-scale while platens compression testing assesses millimetre length-scale properties. Improvements to the testing technique, including the use of a larger diameter spherical indenter tip, may improve the measurement of bone stiffness at the millimetre scale and should be investigated further.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200475 |
| spellingShingle | Oliver R Boughton Shaocheng Ma Sarah Zhao Matthew Arnold Angus Lewis Ulrich Hansen Justin P Cobb Finn Giuliani Richard L Abel Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation. PLoS ONE |
| title | Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation. |
| title_full | Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation. |
| title_fullStr | Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation. |
| title_short | Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation. |
| title_sort | measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200475 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT oliverrboughton measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT shaochengma measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT sarahzhao measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT matthewarnold measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT anguslewis measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT ulrichhansen measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT justinpcobb measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT finngiuliani measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation AT richardlabel measuringbonestiffnessusingsphericalindentation |