Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?

The objective of this study is to explore and to verify the utility of the five moral foundations (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity) to differentiate between two understudied groups, namely, young offenders who use violence against their parents or dating partners, as well as to predic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria L. Vecina, Jose C. Chacón, Raúl Piñuela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597679/full
_version_ 1818412375270752256
author Maria L. Vecina
Jose C. Chacón
Raúl Piñuela
author_facet Maria L. Vecina
Jose C. Chacón
Raúl Piñuela
author_sort Maria L. Vecina
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this study is to explore and to verify the utility of the five moral foundations (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity) to differentiate between two understudied groups, namely, young offenders who use violence against their parents or dating partners, as well as to predict the extent to which these young people justify violence and perceive themselves as aggressive. Although both types of violence imply, by definition, harming someone (low care) and adopting a position of authority (high authority), we hypothesize a very different role for at least these two moral foundations. Our results support this idea and show a much lower regard for the five moral foundations, including care and authority, in the child-to-parent violence group (CPV; N = 65) than in the dating violence group (DV; N = 69). Additionally, the authority foundation was able to increase the effectiveness of correctly classifying the participants in one group or the other by 29%. Finally, care and authority, along with fairness, served to predict justification of violence and self-perceived aggressiveness. The moral foundations approach provides preliminary evidence to better understand two specific types of youth violence and extract preventive educational and treatment strategies.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T10:46:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aaa3c6739acf44ee858cd350d42a28a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T10:46:18Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-aaa3c6739acf44ee858cd350d42a28a82022-12-21T23:05:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-01-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.597679597679Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?Maria L. Vecina0Jose C. Chacón1Raúl Piñuela2Department of Social Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainMethodology of Behavioral Sciences, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainDepartment of Social Psychology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, SpainThe objective of this study is to explore and to verify the utility of the five moral foundations (care, fairness, loyalty, authority, and purity) to differentiate between two understudied groups, namely, young offenders who use violence against their parents or dating partners, as well as to predict the extent to which these young people justify violence and perceive themselves as aggressive. Although both types of violence imply, by definition, harming someone (low care) and adopting a position of authority (high authority), we hypothesize a very different role for at least these two moral foundations. Our results support this idea and show a much lower regard for the five moral foundations, including care and authority, in the child-to-parent violence group (CPV; N = 65) than in the dating violence group (DV; N = 69). Additionally, the authority foundation was able to increase the effectiveness of correctly classifying the participants in one group or the other by 29%. Finally, care and authority, along with fairness, served to predict justification of violence and self-perceived aggressiveness. The moral foundations approach provides preliminary evidence to better understand two specific types of youth violence and extract preventive educational and treatment strategies.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597679/fullmoral foundationschild-parent violencedating violencejuvenile violenceauthority (thesaurus)
spellingShingle Maria L. Vecina
Jose C. Chacón
Raúl Piñuela
Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?
Frontiers in Psychology
moral foundations
child-parent violence
dating violence
juvenile violence
authority (thesaurus)
title Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?
title_full Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?
title_fullStr Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?
title_full_unstemmed Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?
title_short Child-to-Parent Violence and Dating Violence Through the Moral Foundations Theory: Same or Different Moral Roots?
title_sort child to parent violence and dating violence through the moral foundations theory same or different moral roots
topic moral foundations
child-parent violence
dating violence
juvenile violence
authority (thesaurus)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.597679/full
work_keys_str_mv AT marialvecina childtoparentviolenceanddatingviolencethroughthemoralfoundationstheorysameordifferentmoralroots
AT josecchacon childtoparentviolenceanddatingviolencethroughthemoralfoundationstheorysameordifferentmoralroots
AT raulpinuela childtoparentviolenceanddatingviolencethroughthemoralfoundationstheorysameordifferentmoralroots