Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market

The commons literature focuses heavily on rules and the behavior of resource users but places less emphasis on the returns to individual effort. However, for most resource settings, market conditions and associated resource prices are key drivers of exploitation effort. In a globalized world, import...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Asche, Atle Oglend, Martin D Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2022-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5b3e
_version_ 1797747093101608960
author Frank Asche
Atle Oglend
Martin D Smith
author_facet Frank Asche
Atle Oglend
Martin D Smith
author_sort Frank Asche
collection DOAJ
description The commons literature focuses heavily on rules and the behavior of resource users but places less emphasis on the returns to individual effort. However, for most resource settings, market conditions and associated resource prices are key drivers of exploitation effort. In a globalized world, import competition can strongly influence the incentives for individual resource users, a topic largely unexplored in the commons literature. Import competition is especially salient for seafood, one of the most internationally traded food groups. We analyze the US shrimp market, which was once dominated by domestic catches but is now mostly supplied by imports. For domestic producers (users of the commons), lower revenues result, while US consumers eat more shrimp at lower prices. Globalization changed the sources of price risk and compensation that domestic producers face and altered incentives to exploit the commons. In a market dominated by domestic supply shocks, the price response to a shock moderates the effect on revenue and effort. In a market dominated by imports, domestic shocks are buffered by import adjustments, while price movements are determined by global shocks. Despite losses for the domestic fishery, globalization creates new incentives to coordinate effort and capture price premiums determined in the global market.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:46:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aab4f3486a35441bb3feac34cb85cfb2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:46:15Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-aab4f3486a35441bb3feac34cb85cfb22023-08-09T15:26:13ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262022-01-0117404502310.1088/1748-9326/ac5b3eGlobal markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp marketFrank Asche0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1540-9728Atle Oglend1Martin D Smith2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-463XSchool of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences and Food Systems Institute, University of Florida , Gainesville FL, United States of America; Department of Industrial Economics, University of Stavanger , Stavanger, NorwayDepartment of Industrial Economics, University of Stavanger , Stavanger, NorwayGeorge M. Woodwell Distinguished Professor of Environmental Economics, Nicholas School of the Environment and Department of Economics, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States of AmericaThe commons literature focuses heavily on rules and the behavior of resource users but places less emphasis on the returns to individual effort. However, for most resource settings, market conditions and associated resource prices are key drivers of exploitation effort. In a globalized world, import competition can strongly influence the incentives for individual resource users, a topic largely unexplored in the commons literature. Import competition is especially salient for seafood, one of the most internationally traded food groups. We analyze the US shrimp market, which was once dominated by domestic catches but is now mostly supplied by imports. For domestic producers (users of the commons), lower revenues result, while US consumers eat more shrimp at lower prices. Globalization changed the sources of price risk and compensation that domestic producers face and altered incentives to exploit the commons. In a market dominated by domestic supply shocks, the price response to a shock moderates the effect on revenue and effort. In a market dominated by imports, domestic shocks are buffered by import adjustments, while price movements are determined by global shocks. Despite losses for the domestic fishery, globalization creates new incentives to coordinate effort and capture price premiums determined in the global market.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5b3eseafood demandimport competitionfisherieslaw of one priceseafood supply chain
spellingShingle Frank Asche
Atle Oglend
Martin D Smith
Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market
Environmental Research Letters
seafood demand
import competition
fisheries
law of one price
seafood supply chain
title Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market
title_full Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market
title_fullStr Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market
title_full_unstemmed Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market
title_short Global markets and the commons: the role of imports in the US wild-caught shrimp market
title_sort global markets and the commons the role of imports in the us wild caught shrimp market
topic seafood demand
import competition
fisheries
law of one price
seafood supply chain
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5b3e
work_keys_str_mv AT frankasche globalmarketsandthecommonstheroleofimportsintheuswildcaughtshrimpmarket
AT atleoglend globalmarketsandthecommonstheroleofimportsintheuswildcaughtshrimpmarket
AT martindsmith globalmarketsandthecommonstheroleofimportsintheuswildcaughtshrimpmarket