Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales

The courts of England and Wales permit applicants in 1980 Hague Convention child abduction proceedings also to bring concurrent applications for the return of the child to their state of habitual residence based on a summary welfare assessment, which can be issued and heard alongside the Hague appli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rob George, James Netto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-08-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/4/70
_version_ 1797584121342459904
author Rob George
James Netto
author_facet Rob George
James Netto
author_sort Rob George
collection DOAJ
description The courts of England and Wales permit applicants in 1980 Hague Convention child abduction proceedings also to bring concurrent applications for the return of the child to their state of habitual residence based on a summary welfare assessment, which can be issued and heard alongside the Hague application. Given the different nature of these two applications, having them heard concurrently raises a number of challenges for the parties in terms of the evidence required and for the court in terms of the analytical process being undertaken. This article explores the nature of the two applications, the reasons why they might be brought concurrently, and the challenges that can arise in such cases.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:48:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aac97e4aa73d4d229026cd447c88c764
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2075-471X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:48:49Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Laws
spelling doaj.art-aac97e4aa73d4d229026cd447c88c7642023-11-19T01:53:00ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2023-08-011247010.3390/laws12040070Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and WalesRob George0James Netto1Faculty of Laws, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UKThe International Family Law Group, London EC2V 6AA, UKThe courts of England and Wales permit applicants in 1980 Hague Convention child abduction proceedings also to bring concurrent applications for the return of the child to their state of habitual residence based on a summary welfare assessment, which can be issued and heard alongside the Hague application. Given the different nature of these two applications, having them heard concurrently raises a number of challenges for the parties in terms of the evidence required and for the court in terms of the analytical process being undertaken. This article explores the nature of the two applications, the reasons why they might be brought concurrently, and the challenges that can arise in such cases.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/4/70abduction1980 Hague Conventionnon-Convention abduction casescourt procedureconcurrent applications
spellingShingle Rob George
James Netto
Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales
Laws
abduction
1980 Hague Convention
non-Convention abduction cases
court procedure
concurrent applications
title Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales
title_full Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales
title_fullStr Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales
title_short Concurrent Convention and Non-Convention Cases: Child Abduction in England and Wales
title_sort concurrent convention and non convention cases child abduction in england and wales
topic abduction
1980 Hague Convention
non-Convention abduction cases
court procedure
concurrent applications
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/12/4/70
work_keys_str_mv AT robgeorge concurrentconventionandnonconventioncaseschildabductioninenglandandwales
AT jamesnetto concurrentconventionandnonconventioncaseschildabductioninenglandandwales