Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has become a valuable tool in cognitive neuroscience research as it enables causal inferences about neural underpinnings of cognition. However, studies using tDCS to modulate cognitive functions often yield inconsistent findings. Hence, there is an incr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marija Stanković, Marko Živanović, Jovana Bjekić, Saša R. Filipović
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/1/58
_version_ 1797495421380067328
author Marija Stanković
Marko Živanović
Jovana Bjekić
Saša R. Filipović
author_facet Marija Stanković
Marko Živanović
Jovana Bjekić
Saša R. Filipović
author_sort Marija Stanković
collection DOAJ
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has become a valuable tool in cognitive neuroscience research as it enables causal inferences about neural underpinnings of cognition. However, studies using tDCS to modulate cognitive functions often yield inconsistent findings. Hence, there is an increasing interest in factors that may moderate the effects, one of which is the participants’ beliefs of the tDCS condition (i.e., real or sham) they received. Namely, whether participants’ correct guessing of sham condition may lead to false-positive tDCS effects. In this study, we aimed to explore if participants’ beliefs about received stimulation type (i.e., the success of blinding) impacted their task performance in tDCS experiments on associative (AM) and working memory (WM). We analyzed data from four within-subject, sham-controlled tDCS memory experiments (<i>N</i> = 83) to check if the correct end-of-study guess of sham condition moderated tDCS effects. We found no evidence that sham guessing moderated post-tDCS memory performance in experiments in which tDCS effects were observed as well as in experiments that showed null effects of tDCS. The results suggest that the correct sham guessing (i.e., placebo-like effect) is unlikely to influence the results in tDCS memory experiments. We discuss the results in light of the growing debate about the relevance and effectiveness of blinding in brain stimulation research.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T01:49:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aacf9ee6605a470dbf75c1876c6bcb3b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T01:49:21Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-aacf9ee6605a470dbf75c1876c6bcb3b2023-11-23T13:09:28ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-12-011215810.3390/brainsci12010058Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working MemoryMarija Stanković0Marko Živanović1Jovana Bjekić2Saša R. Filipović3Human Neuroscience Group, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaInstitute of Psychology and Laboratory for Research of Individual Differences, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaHuman Neuroscience Group, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaHuman Neuroscience Group, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, SerbiaTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has become a valuable tool in cognitive neuroscience research as it enables causal inferences about neural underpinnings of cognition. However, studies using tDCS to modulate cognitive functions often yield inconsistent findings. Hence, there is an increasing interest in factors that may moderate the effects, one of which is the participants’ beliefs of the tDCS condition (i.e., real or sham) they received. Namely, whether participants’ correct guessing of sham condition may lead to false-positive tDCS effects. In this study, we aimed to explore if participants’ beliefs about received stimulation type (i.e., the success of blinding) impacted their task performance in tDCS experiments on associative (AM) and working memory (WM). We analyzed data from four within-subject, sham-controlled tDCS memory experiments (<i>N</i> = 83) to check if the correct end-of-study guess of sham condition moderated tDCS effects. We found no evidence that sham guessing moderated post-tDCS memory performance in experiments in which tDCS effects were observed as well as in experiments that showed null effects of tDCS. The results suggest that the correct sham guessing (i.e., placebo-like effect) is unlikely to influence the results in tDCS memory experiments. We discuss the results in light of the growing debate about the relevance and effectiveness of blinding in brain stimulation research.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/1/58transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)blindingplaceboshamassociative memoryworking memory
spellingShingle Marija Stanković
Marko Živanović
Jovana Bjekić
Saša R. Filipović
Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory
Brain Sciences
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
blinding
placebo
sham
associative memory
working memory
title Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory
title_full Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory
title_fullStr Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory
title_full_unstemmed Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory
title_short Blinding in tDCS Studies: Correct End-of-Study Guess Does Not Moderate the Effects on Associative and Working Memory
title_sort blinding in tdcs studies correct end of study guess does not moderate the effects on associative and working memory
topic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
blinding
placebo
sham
associative memory
working memory
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/1/58
work_keys_str_mv AT marijastankovic blindingintdcsstudiescorrectendofstudyguessdoesnotmoderatetheeffectsonassociativeandworkingmemory
AT markozivanovic blindingintdcsstudiescorrectendofstudyguessdoesnotmoderatetheeffectsonassociativeandworkingmemory
AT jovanabjekic blindingintdcsstudiescorrectendofstudyguessdoesnotmoderatetheeffectsonassociativeandworkingmemory
AT sasarfilipovic blindingintdcsstudiescorrectendofstudyguessdoesnotmoderatetheeffectsonassociativeandworkingmemory