Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020

Abstract To define the relationship between sex, residence, maternal age, and a broad range of birth defects by conducting a comprehensive cross-analysis based on up-to-date data. Data were obtained from the Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020. Prevalences of birth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu Zhou, Shenglan Cai, Hua Wang, Junqun Fang, Jie Gao, Haiyan Kuang, Donghua Xie, Jian He, Aihua Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-11-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47741-1
_version_ 1797452670846369792
author Xu Zhou
Shenglan Cai
Hua Wang
Junqun Fang
Jie Gao
Haiyan Kuang
Donghua Xie
Jian He
Aihua Wang
author_facet Xu Zhou
Shenglan Cai
Hua Wang
Junqun Fang
Jie Gao
Haiyan Kuang
Donghua Xie
Jian He
Aihua Wang
author_sort Xu Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract To define the relationship between sex, residence, maternal age, and a broad range of birth defects by conducting a comprehensive cross-analysis based on up-to-date data. Data were obtained from the Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020. Prevalences of birth defects (number of cases per 10,000 fetuses (births and deaths at 28 weeks of gestation and beyond)) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by sex, residence, maternal age, year, and 23 specific defects. Cross-analysis of sex, residence, and maternal age was conducted, and crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to examine the association of each maternal characteristic with birth defects. A total of 1,619,376 fetuses and 30,596 birth defects were identified. The prevalence of birth defects was 188.94/10,000 (95% CI 186.82–191.05). Birth defects were more frequent in males than females (210.46 vs. 163.03/10,000, OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.27–1.33), in urban areas than in rural areas (223.61 vs. 162.90/10,000, OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.35–1.41), and in mothers ≥ 35 than mothers 25–29 (206.35 vs. 187.79/10,000, OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.14). Cross-analysis showed that the prevalence of birth defects was higher in urban females than in rural males (194.53 vs. 182.25/10,000), the difference in prevalence between males and females was more significant for maternal age < 20 compared to other age groups (OR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.37–1.95), and the prevalence difference between urban and rural areas is more significant for maternal age 25–34 compared to other age groups (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.43–1.57). Cleft palates were more frequent in males, and nine specific defects were more frequent in females. Five specific defects were more frequent in rural areas, and eight were more frequent in urban areas. Compared to mothers 25–29, five specific defects were more frequent in mothers < 20, seven specific defects were more frequent in mothers 20–24, two specific defects were more frequent in mothers 30–34, and ten specific defects were more frequent in mothers ≥ 35. Our data indicate that sex, residence, and maternal age differences in the prevalences of birth defects and most specific defects are common. We have found some new epidemiological characteristics of birth defects using cross-analysis, such as residence is the determining factor for the prevalence of birth defects, the difference in prevalence between males and females was more significant for maternal age < 20 compared to other age groups, the prevalence difference between urban and rural areas is more significant for maternal age 25–34 compared to other age groups. And differences in the epidemiological characteristics of some specific defects from previous studies. Future studies should examine mechanisms. Our findings contributed to clinical counseling and advancing research on the risk factors for birth defects.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:12:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aad1e15103f542dbbac7179ad5250a1b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:12:00Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-aad1e15103f542dbbac7179ad5250a1b2023-11-26T13:20:20ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-11-0113111210.1038/s41598-023-47741-1Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020Xu Zhou0Shenglan Cai1Hua Wang2Junqun Fang3Jie Gao4Haiyan Kuang5Donghua Xie6Jian He7Aihua Wang8Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalThe Hunan Children’s HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalHunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care HospitalAbstract To define the relationship between sex, residence, maternal age, and a broad range of birth defects by conducting a comprehensive cross-analysis based on up-to-date data. Data were obtained from the Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020. Prevalences of birth defects (number of cases per 10,000 fetuses (births and deaths at 28 weeks of gestation and beyond)) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by sex, residence, maternal age, year, and 23 specific defects. Cross-analysis of sex, residence, and maternal age was conducted, and crude odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to examine the association of each maternal characteristic with birth defects. A total of 1,619,376 fetuses and 30,596 birth defects were identified. The prevalence of birth defects was 188.94/10,000 (95% CI 186.82–191.05). Birth defects were more frequent in males than females (210.46 vs. 163.03/10,000, OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.27–1.33), in urban areas than in rural areas (223.61 vs. 162.90/10,000, OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.35–1.41), and in mothers ≥ 35 than mothers 25–29 (206.35 vs. 187.79/10,000, OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.06–1.14). Cross-analysis showed that the prevalence of birth defects was higher in urban females than in rural males (194.53 vs. 182.25/10,000), the difference in prevalence between males and females was more significant for maternal age < 20 compared to other age groups (OR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.37–1.95), and the prevalence difference between urban and rural areas is more significant for maternal age 25–34 compared to other age groups (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.43–1.57). Cleft palates were more frequent in males, and nine specific defects were more frequent in females. Five specific defects were more frequent in rural areas, and eight were more frequent in urban areas. Compared to mothers 25–29, five specific defects were more frequent in mothers < 20, seven specific defects were more frequent in mothers 20–24, two specific defects were more frequent in mothers 30–34, and ten specific defects were more frequent in mothers ≥ 35. Our data indicate that sex, residence, and maternal age differences in the prevalences of birth defects and most specific defects are common. We have found some new epidemiological characteristics of birth defects using cross-analysis, such as residence is the determining factor for the prevalence of birth defects, the difference in prevalence between males and females was more significant for maternal age < 20 compared to other age groups, the prevalence difference between urban and rural areas is more significant for maternal age 25–34 compared to other age groups. And differences in the epidemiological characteristics of some specific defects from previous studies. Future studies should examine mechanisms. Our findings contributed to clinical counseling and advancing research on the risk factors for birth defects.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47741-1
spellingShingle Xu Zhou
Shenglan Cai
Hua Wang
Junqun Fang
Jie Gao
Haiyan Kuang
Donghua Xie
Jian He
Aihua Wang
Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020
Scientific Reports
title Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020
title_full Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020
title_fullStr Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020
title_full_unstemmed Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020
title_short Update from a cohort study for birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2010–2020
title_sort update from a cohort study for birth defects in hunan province china 2010 2020
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47741-1
work_keys_str_mv AT xuzhou updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT shenglancai updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT huawang updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT junqunfang updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT jiegao updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT haiyankuang updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT donghuaxie updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT jianhe updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020
AT aihuawang updatefromacohortstudyforbirthdefectsinhunanprovincechina20102020