Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment

Relevance. The forecast of the functionality of the tooth after endodontic treatment, when resistance to mechanical loads is significantly reduced, depends on the choice of method and material for the restoration.Aim. The aim of the work was to compare the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. V. Mitronin, D. Yu. Fadeeva, T. V. Grineva, V. N. Chilikin
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: LLC "Endo Press" 2020-03-01
Series:Эндодонтия Today
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/203
_version_ 1827992226049818624
author A. V. Mitronin
D. Yu. Fadeeva
T. V. Grineva
V. N. Chilikin
author_facet A. V. Mitronin
D. Yu. Fadeeva
T. V. Grineva
V. N. Chilikin
author_sort A. V. Mitronin
collection DOAJ
description Relevance. The forecast of the functionality of the tooth after endodontic treatment, when resistance to mechanical loads is significantly reduced, depends on the choice of method and material for the restoration.Aim. The aim of the work was to compare the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of composite materials used to restore posterior teeth after endodontic treatment.Materials and methods. Studies were carried out according to GOST 31574-2012 – determination of the curing depth, strength with diametral rupture, bending and determination of water absorption and water solubility, as well as the integrity of the restorations, the presence of chips, the development of secondary caries after 24 months.Result of research. Based on a comparison of the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of the composite materials Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent) and SDR (Dentsply) used to restore the posterior teeth after endodontic treatment, as well as the timing of the time spent on treatment, the choice of a composite material for the restoration is justified.Conclusions. Indicators for all the parameters studied composite materials Tetric EvoCeram and SDR more perfect than required by GOST. The time spent on the restoration of the posterior teeth using a two-layer technique using the composite SDR as the basis and restoring the occlusal surface with the Tetric EvoCeram composite is significantly on average 10 minutes less than with a tooth restoration using the multilayer Tetric EvoCeram composite material ( p ≤ 0.05).
first_indexed 2024-04-10T02:59:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aad7f01d84ab45a7990be33dcc516faa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-2981
1726-7242
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-10T02:59:21Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher LLC "Endo Press"
record_format Article
series Эндодонтия Today
spelling doaj.art-aad7f01d84ab45a7990be33dcc516faa2023-03-13T07:39:26ZrusLLC "Endo Press"Эндодонтия Today1683-29811726-72422020-03-01171464910.33925/1683-2981-2019-17-1-46-49203Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatmentA. V. Mitronin0D. Yu. Fadeeva1T. V. Grineva2V. N. Chilikin3Кафедра кариесологии и эндодонтии стоматологического факультета; Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования «Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет имени А. И. Евдокимова» Министерства здравоохранения Российской ФедерацииОбщество с ограниченной ответственностью «Нава»Общество с ограниченной ответственностью «СтомаДент»Государственное автономное учреждение здравоохранения города Москвы «Стоматологическая поликлиника №9 Департамента здравоохранения города Москвы»Relevance. The forecast of the functionality of the tooth after endodontic treatment, when resistance to mechanical loads is significantly reduced, depends on the choice of method and material for the restoration.Aim. The aim of the work was to compare the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of composite materials used to restore posterior teeth after endodontic treatment.Materials and methods. Studies were carried out according to GOST 31574-2012 – determination of the curing depth, strength with diametral rupture, bending and determination of water absorption and water solubility, as well as the integrity of the restorations, the presence of chips, the development of secondary caries after 24 months.Result of research. Based on a comparison of the physicomechanical and clinical qualities of the composite materials Tetric EvoCeram (Ivoclar Vivadent) and SDR (Dentsply) used to restore the posterior teeth after endodontic treatment, as well as the timing of the time spent on treatment, the choice of a composite material for the restoration is justified.Conclusions. Indicators for all the parameters studied composite materials Tetric EvoCeram and SDR more perfect than required by GOST. The time spent on the restoration of the posterior teeth using a two-layer technique using the composite SDR as the basis and restoring the occlusal surface with the Tetric EvoCeram composite is significantly on average 10 minutes less than with a tooth restoration using the multilayer Tetric EvoCeram composite material ( p ≤ 0.05).https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/203реставрация зубов после эндодонтического лечения, физико-механические свойства композитов
spellingShingle A. V. Mitronin
D. Yu. Fadeeva
T. V. Grineva
V. N. Chilikin
Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
Эндодонтия Today
реставрация зубов после эндодонтического лечения, физико-механические свойства композитов
title Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
title_full Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
title_fullStr Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
title_full_unstemmed Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
title_short Justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
title_sort justification of the choice of composite material for the restoration of teeth after endodontic treatment
topic реставрация зубов после эндодонтического лечения, физико-механические свойства композитов
url https://www.endodont.ru/jour/article/view/203
work_keys_str_mv AT avmitronin justificationofthechoiceofcompositematerialfortherestorationofteethafterendodontictreatment
AT dyufadeeva justificationofthechoiceofcompositematerialfortherestorationofteethafterendodontictreatment
AT tvgrineva justificationofthechoiceofcompositematerialfortherestorationofteethafterendodontictreatment
AT vnchilikin justificationofthechoiceofcompositematerialfortherestorationofteethafterendodontictreatment