Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review

Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is one of the most common compression neuropathies of the upper extremity. Conservative management of cubital tunnel syndrome is often considered first line therapy for mild or moderate symptoms; however, there is little evidence-based literature to guide physicians in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sahil Kooner, David Cinats, Cory Kwong, Graeme Drew Matthewson, Gurpreet Dhaliwal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Medical Publishing 2019-06-01
Series:Orthopedic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/7955
_version_ 1818390137742032896
author Sahil Kooner
David Cinats
Cory Kwong
Graeme Drew Matthewson
Gurpreet Dhaliwal
author_facet Sahil Kooner
David Cinats
Cory Kwong
Graeme Drew Matthewson
Gurpreet Dhaliwal
author_sort Sahil Kooner
collection DOAJ
description Cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is one of the most common compression neuropathies of the upper extremity. Conservative management of cubital tunnel syndrome is often considered first line therapy for mild or moderate symptoms; however, there is little evidence-based literature to guide physicians in this regard. As such, the objective of this study is to complete a comprehensive literature search of the conservative therapies available for treatment of CuTS. Additionally, we hope to assess the evidence for each therapy so that we can make evidence-based recommendations regarding the type and duration of optimal treatment. The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were search using a sensitive search strategy. Eligibility for studies included any studies or conference abstracts in which patients were treated conservatively for primary CuTS. Any form of non-operative treatment was acceptable. A data extraction form was developed to collect all information and outcomes of interest, including study design, level of evidence, number of patients, treatment modalities, follow-up time, patient reported outcomes, and electrophysiological markers. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was then completed based on the data extraction form. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, results were summarized as best evidence available. Our sensitive literature search produced 6484 studies. Initial screening based on title and abstract resulted in the selection of 40 studies that underwent full text review. From these 19 studies were included for analysis in our systematic review. There were 3 level I studies, 4 level II studies, 3 level III studies, and 9 level IV studies. In total this included 844 patients. The most commonly reported outcomes included subjective patient reported outcomes and nerve conduction studies. The most common treatment modalities, from most to least common, included education and activity modification, splinting, steroid/lidocaine injection, nerve mobilization/gliding, pulsed ultrasound, laser therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physiotherapy. The most common duration of therapy was 3 months with a median follow-up time of 3 months. There was moderate strength evidence to recommend the use of education/activity modification or splinting in mild or moderate CuTS. There is a paucity of literature and high-quality studies regarding the conservative management of CuTS. Regardless, there appears to be a role for non-operative management in CuTS, although further studies are needed to delineate this role further. In the cases of mild or moderate CuTS it is reasonable to trial education/activity modification or splinting as both appear to be equally effective.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T04:52:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aadec9c45be247fb9bba56fe4173ce8f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2035-8237
2035-8164
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T04:52:51Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher Open Medical Publishing
record_format Article
series Orthopedic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-aadec9c45be247fb9bba56fe4173ce8f2022-12-21T23:16:29ZengOpen Medical PublishingOrthopedic Reviews2035-82372035-81642019-06-0111210.4081/or.2019.7955Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic reviewSahil Kooner0David Cinats1Cory Kwong2Graeme Drew Matthewson3Gurpreet Dhaliwal4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of CalgaryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of CalgaryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of CalgaryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of ManitobaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of CalgaryCubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) is one of the most common compression neuropathies of the upper extremity. Conservative management of cubital tunnel syndrome is often considered first line therapy for mild or moderate symptoms; however, there is little evidence-based literature to guide physicians in this regard. As such, the objective of this study is to complete a comprehensive literature search of the conservative therapies available for treatment of CuTS. Additionally, we hope to assess the evidence for each therapy so that we can make evidence-based recommendations regarding the type and duration of optimal treatment. The databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL were search using a sensitive search strategy. Eligibility for studies included any studies or conference abstracts in which patients were treated conservatively for primary CuTS. Any form of non-operative treatment was acceptable. A data extraction form was developed to collect all information and outcomes of interest, including study design, level of evidence, number of patients, treatment modalities, follow-up time, patient reported outcomes, and electrophysiological markers. Qualitative and quantitative analysis was then completed based on the data extraction form. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, results were summarized as best evidence available. Our sensitive literature search produced 6484 studies. Initial screening based on title and abstract resulted in the selection of 40 studies that underwent full text review. From these 19 studies were included for analysis in our systematic review. There were 3 level I studies, 4 level II studies, 3 level III studies, and 9 level IV studies. In total this included 844 patients. The most commonly reported outcomes included subjective patient reported outcomes and nerve conduction studies. The most common treatment modalities, from most to least common, included education and activity modification, splinting, steroid/lidocaine injection, nerve mobilization/gliding, pulsed ultrasound, laser therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physiotherapy. The most common duration of therapy was 3 months with a median follow-up time of 3 months. There was moderate strength evidence to recommend the use of education/activity modification or splinting in mild or moderate CuTS. There is a paucity of literature and high-quality studies regarding the conservative management of CuTS. Regardless, there appears to be a role for non-operative management in CuTS, although further studies are needed to delineate this role further. In the cases of mild or moderate CuTS it is reasonable to trial education/activity modification or splinting as both appear to be equally effective.https://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/7955cubital tunnelnon-operative managementsystematic review
spellingShingle Sahil Kooner
David Cinats
Cory Kwong
Graeme Drew Matthewson
Gurpreet Dhaliwal
Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review
Orthopedic Reviews
cubital tunnel
non-operative management
systematic review
title Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review
title_full Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review
title_fullStr Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review
title_short Conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: A systematic review
title_sort conservative treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome a systematic review
topic cubital tunnel
non-operative management
systematic review
url https://www.pagepress.org/journals/index.php/or/article/view/7955
work_keys_str_mv AT sahilkooner conservativetreatmentofcubitaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT davidcinats conservativetreatmentofcubitaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT corykwong conservativetreatmentofcubitaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT graemedrewmatthewson conservativetreatmentofcubitaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview
AT gurpreetdhaliwal conservativetreatmentofcubitaltunnelsyndromeasystematicreview