Theorizing Jewish Ethics
The concept of Jewish ethics is elusive. Law occupies a prominent place in the phenomenology of traditional Judaism. What room is left for ethics? This paper argues that the dichotomy between law and ethics, with regard to Judaism, is misleading. The fixity of these categories presumes too much, bot...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Studia Humana |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2014-0007 |
_version_ | 1819291126215999488 |
---|---|
author | Mittleman Alan |
author_facet | Mittleman Alan |
author_sort | Mittleman Alan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The concept of Jewish ethics is elusive. Law occupies a prominent place in the phenomenology of traditional Judaism. What room is left for ethics? This paper argues that the dichotomy between law and ethics, with regard to Judaism, is misleading. The fixity of these categories presumes too much, both about normativity per se and about Judaism. Rather than naming categories “law” and “ethics” should be seen as contrastive terms that play a role in fundamental arguments about how to characterize Judaism. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-24T03:33:41Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-aadf279bd2114484bddaff5223d7b743 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2299-0518 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-24T03:33:41Z |
publishDate | 2014-06-01 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | Article |
series | Studia Humana |
spelling | doaj.art-aadf279bd2114484bddaff5223d7b7432022-12-21T17:17:08ZengSciendoStudia Humana2299-05182014-06-0132324210.2478/sh-2014-0007sh-2014-0007Theorizing Jewish EthicsMittleman Alan0The Jewish Theological Seminary, USAThe concept of Jewish ethics is elusive. Law occupies a prominent place in the phenomenology of traditional Judaism. What room is left for ethics? This paper argues that the dichotomy between law and ethics, with regard to Judaism, is misleading. The fixity of these categories presumes too much, both about normativity per se and about Judaism. Rather than naming categories “law” and “ethics” should be seen as contrastive terms that play a role in fundamental arguments about how to characterize Judaism.https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2014-0007judaismethicsjewish philosophy |
spellingShingle | Mittleman Alan Theorizing Jewish Ethics Studia Humana judaism ethics jewish philosophy |
title | Theorizing Jewish Ethics |
title_full | Theorizing Jewish Ethics |
title_fullStr | Theorizing Jewish Ethics |
title_full_unstemmed | Theorizing Jewish Ethics |
title_short | Theorizing Jewish Ethics |
title_sort | theorizing jewish ethics |
topic | judaism ethics jewish philosophy |
url | https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2014-0007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittlemanalan theorizingjewishethics |