The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the cha...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2018-10-01
|
| Series: | F1000Research |
| Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/7-501/v2 |
| _version_ | 1818500329502670848 |
|---|---|
| author | Devin R. Berg Kyle E. Niemeyer |
| author_facet | Devin R. Berg Kyle E. Niemeyer |
| author_sort | Devin R. Berg |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the challenges faced by scholars looking to do so. Further, we present our thoughts and reflections on the role that open engineering research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university. We have made some specific recommendations on how the public university can recommit to and push the boundaries of its role as the creator and promoter of public knowledge. In doing so, the university will further demonstrate its vital role in the continued economic, social, and technological development of society. We have also included some thoughts on how this applies specifically to the field of engineering and how a culture of openness and sharing within the engineering community can help drive societal development. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T20:41:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-aae3632d51724efc8d26c06036ec40c3 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2046-1402 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T20:41:14Z |
| publishDate | 2018-10-01 |
| publisher | F1000 Research Ltd |
| record_format | Article |
| series | F1000Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-aae3632d51724efc8d26c06036ec40c32022-12-22T01:34:22ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022018-10-01710.12688/f1000research.14593.218090The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]Devin R. Berg0Kyle E. Niemeyer1Engineering & Technology Department, University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI, 54751, USASchool of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USAIn this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the challenges faced by scholars looking to do so. Further, we present our thoughts and reflections on the role that open engineering research can play in defining the purpose and activities of the university. We have made some specific recommendations on how the public university can recommit to and push the boundaries of its role as the creator and promoter of public knowledge. In doing so, the university will further demonstrate its vital role in the continued economic, social, and technological development of society. We have also included some thoughts on how this applies specifically to the field of engineering and how a culture of openness and sharing within the engineering community can help drive societal development.https://f1000research.com/articles/7-501/v2 |
| spellingShingle | Devin R. Berg Kyle E. Niemeyer The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] F1000Research |
| title | The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
| title_full | The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
| title_fullStr | The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
| title_full_unstemmed | The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
| title_short | The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] |
| title_sort | case for openness in engineering research version 2 peer review 2 approved 1 approved with reservations |
| url | https://f1000research.com/articles/7-501/v2 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT devinrberg thecaseforopennessinengineeringresearchversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations AT kyleeniemeyer thecaseforopennessinengineeringresearchversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations AT devinrberg caseforopennessinengineeringresearchversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations AT kyleeniemeyer caseforopennessinengineeringresearchversion2peerreview2approved1approvedwithreservations |