The case for openness in engineering research [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
In this article, we describe our views on the benefits, and possible downsides, of openness in engineering research. We attempt to examine the issue from multiple perspectives, including reasons and motivations for introducing open practices into an engineering researcher's workflow and the cha...
Main Authors: | Devin R. Berg, Kyle E. Niemeyer |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2018-10-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/7-501/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Open Science Training in TRIPLE [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Lottie Provost, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Open Science Training in TRIPLE [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Lottie Provost, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Open Problems in Computational Historical Linguistics [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Johann-Mattis List
Published: (2023-11-01) -
The nature of the open birth interval distribution [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: John Ross, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01) -
Case Report: Isolated Lingual Dystonia [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Zaland Ahmed Yousafzai, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)