Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review

This study aimed to summarise different interventions used to improve clinical models and pathways in the management of chronic and acute heart failure (HF). A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cristina Pedroni, Olivera Djuric, Maria Chiara Bassi, Lorenzo Mione, Dalia Caleffi, Giacomo Testa, Cesarina Prandi, Alessandro Navazio, Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-04-01
Series:Healthcare
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/9/1227
_version_ 1797602639294234624
author Cristina Pedroni
Olivera Djuric
Maria Chiara Bassi
Lorenzo Mione
Dalia Caleffi
Giacomo Testa
Cesarina Prandi
Alessandro Navazio
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
author_facet Cristina Pedroni
Olivera Djuric
Maria Chiara Bassi
Lorenzo Mione
Dalia Caleffi
Giacomo Testa
Cesarina Prandi
Alessandro Navazio
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
author_sort Cristina Pedroni
collection DOAJ
description This study aimed to summarise different interventions used to improve clinical models and pathways in the management of chronic and acute heart failure (HF). A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for systematic reviews (SR) published in the period from 2014 to 2019 in the English language. Primary articles cited in SR that fulfil inclusion and exclusion criteria were extracted and examined using narrative synthesis. Interventions were classified based on five chosen elements of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) framework (self-management support, decision support, community resources and policies, delivery system, and clinical information system). Out of 155 SRs retrieved, 7 were considered for the extraction of 166 primary articles. The prevailing setting was the patient’s home. Only 46 studies specified the severity of HF by reporting the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment in a heterogeneous manner. However, most studies targeted the populations with LVEF ≤ 45% and LVEF < 40%. Self-management and delivery systems were the most evaluated CCM elements. Interventions related to community resources and policy and advising/reminding systems for providers were rarely evaluated. No studies addressed the implementation of a disease registry. A multidisciplinary team was available with similarly low frequency in each setting. Although HF care should be a multi-component model, most studies did not analyse the role of some important components, such as the decision support tools to disseminate guidelines and program planning that includes measurable targets.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T04:18:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aaf2055b6baf47d49717bc8e8aa5781f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-9032
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T04:18:21Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Healthcare
spelling doaj.art-aaf2055b6baf47d49717bc8e8aa5781f2023-11-17T22:57:05ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322023-04-01119122710.3390/healthcare11091227Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping ReviewCristina Pedroni0Olivera Djuric1Maria Chiara Bassi2Lorenzo Mione3Dalia Caleffi4Giacomo Testa5Cesarina Prandi6Alessandro Navazio7Paolo Giorgi Rossi8Direzione delle Professioni Sanitarie, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, ItalyEpidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale–IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, ItalyMedical Library, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, ItalyLaurea Magistrale in Scienze Infermieristiche e Ostetriche, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, ItalyCardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Modena, 41124 Modena, ItalyUO Medicina, Ospedale Giuseppe Dossetti, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Bologna, 40053 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Business Economics, Health & Social Care, University of Applied Sciences & Arts of Southern Switzerland, CH-6928 Manno, SwitzerlandCardiology Division, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123 Reggio Emilia, ItalyEpidemiology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale–IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, ItalyThis study aimed to summarise different interventions used to improve clinical models and pathways in the management of chronic and acute heart failure (HF). A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for systematic reviews (SR) published in the period from 2014 to 2019 in the English language. Primary articles cited in SR that fulfil inclusion and exclusion criteria were extracted and examined using narrative synthesis. Interventions were classified based on five chosen elements of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) framework (self-management support, decision support, community resources and policies, delivery system, and clinical information system). Out of 155 SRs retrieved, 7 were considered for the extraction of 166 primary articles. The prevailing setting was the patient’s home. Only 46 studies specified the severity of HF by reporting the level of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment in a heterogeneous manner. However, most studies targeted the populations with LVEF ≤ 45% and LVEF < 40%. Self-management and delivery systems were the most evaluated CCM elements. Interventions related to community resources and policy and advising/reminding systems for providers were rarely evaluated. No studies addressed the implementation of a disease registry. A multidisciplinary team was available with similarly low frequency in each setting. Although HF care should be a multi-component model, most studies did not analyse the role of some important components, such as the decision support tools to disseminate guidelines and program planning that includes measurable targets.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/9/1227heart failuredisease managementclinical pathwayschronic care modelmultidisciplinary
spellingShingle Cristina Pedroni
Olivera Djuric
Maria Chiara Bassi
Lorenzo Mione
Dalia Caleffi
Giacomo Testa
Cesarina Prandi
Alessandro Navazio
Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review
Healthcare
heart failure
disease management
clinical pathways
chronic care model
multidisciplinary
title Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review
title_full Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review
title_short Elements Characterising Multicomponent Interventions Used to Improve Disease Management Models and Clinical Pathways in Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Scoping Review
title_sort elements characterising multicomponent interventions used to improve disease management models and clinical pathways in acute and chronic heart failure a scoping review
topic heart failure
disease management
clinical pathways
chronic care model
multidisciplinary
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/9/1227
work_keys_str_mv AT cristinapedroni elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT oliveradjuric elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT mariachiarabassi elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT lorenzomione elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT daliacaleffi elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT giacomotesta elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT cesarinaprandi elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT alessandronavazio elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview
AT paologiorgirossi elementscharacterisingmulticomponentinterventionsusedtoimprovediseasemanagementmodelsandclinicalpathwaysinacuteandchronicheartfailureascopingreview