Can reflective multicriteria be the new paradigm for healthcare decision-making? The EVIDEM journey
Abstract Background Multiple technologies, procedures and programs call for fairly-based decisions for prioritization of healthcare interventions. There is a diversity of perspectives of what constitutes a legitimate decision, which depends on both the process and the reasoning applied. Current appr...
Main Authors: | Mireille M. Goetghebeur, Marjo S. Cellier |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0116-9 |
Similar Items
-
Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies: A Reflection on Legitimacy, Values and Patient and Public Involvement; Comment on “Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe”
by: Mireille Goetghebeur, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Global Developments in Priority Setting in Health
by: Rob Baltussen, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01) -
Should Priority Setting Also Be Concerned About Profound Socio-Economic Transformations? A Response to Recent Commentary
by: Brayan V. Seixas, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Can clinical ethics committees be legitimate actors in bedside rationing?
by: Morten Magelssen, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Attitudes towards priority setting in the norwegian health care system: a general population survey
by: Carl Tollef Solberg, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)