The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition

Resource efficient winter-feeding of mature pregnant beef cows requires knowledge of how different roughage-based feeding strategies affect cow intake and energy status. Four diets based on traditional timothy-meadow fescue silage (TM), festulolium silage plus urea (FE), reed canarygrass silage (RC)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mikaela Jardstedt, Elisabet Nadeau, Mette Olaf Nielsen, Peder Nørgaard, Anna Hessle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/3/496
_version_ 1818115297391935488
author Mikaela Jardstedt
Elisabet Nadeau
Mette Olaf Nielsen
Peder Nørgaard
Anna Hessle
author_facet Mikaela Jardstedt
Elisabet Nadeau
Mette Olaf Nielsen
Peder Nørgaard
Anna Hessle
author_sort Mikaela Jardstedt
collection DOAJ
description Resource efficient winter-feeding of mature pregnant beef cows requires knowledge of how different roughage-based feeding strategies affect cow intake and energy status. Four diets based on traditional timothy-meadow fescue silage (TM), festulolium silage plus urea (FE), reed canarygrass silage (RC) or barley straw supplemented with urea and rapeseed meal (BR), were fed ad libitum for 16 weeks prepartum to 36 Hereford cows. Postpartum, cows were fed the same diet before release on pasture. Individual data on cow intake, changes in body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS) and plasma metabolites, calf birth and weaning weights were recorded. The TM and FE diets resulted in increased BW and BCS prepartum (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while the RC and BR diets resulted in a catabolic state, as indicated by a loss of BCS, lower insulin levels and higher non-esterified fatty acid levels in cows fed BR (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were no dietary effects on calf parameters (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.29). Feeding RC or BR prepartum might be a possible alternative to traditional timothy-meadow fescue silage if cows are allowed to regain lost BCS during the grazing period. The influence on cow reproductive- and calf performance should be considered before making this management change.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:04:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aafc2e3aee8549149c8f133dd9722796
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:04:23Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-aafc2e3aee8549149c8f133dd97227962022-12-22T01:21:33ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152020-03-0110349610.3390/ani10030496ani10030496The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around ParturitionMikaela Jardstedt0Elisabet Nadeau1Mette Olaf Nielsen2Peder Nørgaard3Anna Hessle4Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 234, 532 23 Skara, SwedenDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 234, 532 23 Skara, SwedenDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, DenmarkDepartment of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Grønnegårdsvej 3, 1870 Frederiksberg C, DenmarkDepartment of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 234, 532 23 Skara, SwedenResource efficient winter-feeding of mature pregnant beef cows requires knowledge of how different roughage-based feeding strategies affect cow intake and energy status. Four diets based on traditional timothy-meadow fescue silage (TM), festulolium silage plus urea (FE), reed canarygrass silage (RC) or barley straw supplemented with urea and rapeseed meal (BR), were fed ad libitum for 16 weeks prepartum to 36 Hereford cows. Postpartum, cows were fed the same diet before release on pasture. Individual data on cow intake, changes in body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS) and plasma metabolites, calf birth and weaning weights were recorded. The TM and FE diets resulted in increased BW and BCS prepartum (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), while the RC and BR diets resulted in a catabolic state, as indicated by a loss of BCS, lower insulin levels and higher non-esterified fatty acid levels in cows fed BR (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There were no dietary effects on calf parameters (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.29). Feeding RC or BR prepartum might be a possible alternative to traditional timothy-meadow fescue silage if cows are allowed to regain lost BCS during the grazing period. The influence on cow reproductive- and calf performance should be considered before making this management change.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/3/496beef cowbody condition scoreenergy statusgestationmetabolic profileroughage
spellingShingle Mikaela Jardstedt
Elisabet Nadeau
Mette Olaf Nielsen
Peder Nørgaard
Anna Hessle
The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition
Animals
beef cow
body condition score
energy status
gestation
metabolic profile
roughage
title The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition
title_full The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition
title_fullStr The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition
title_short The Effect of Feeding Roughages of Varying Digestibility Prepartum on Energy Status and Metabolic Profiles in Beef Cows around Parturition
title_sort effect of feeding roughages of varying digestibility prepartum on energy status and metabolic profiles in beef cows around parturition
topic beef cow
body condition score
energy status
gestation
metabolic profile
roughage
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/10/3/496
work_keys_str_mv AT mikaelajardstedt theeffectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT elisabetnadeau theeffectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT metteolafnielsen theeffectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT pedernørgaard theeffectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT annahessle theeffectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT mikaelajardstedt effectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT elisabetnadeau effectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT metteolafnielsen effectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT pedernørgaard effectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition
AT annahessle effectoffeedingroughagesofvaryingdigestibilityprepartumonenergystatusandmetabolicprofilesinbeefcowsaroundparturition