Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria

Coastal socio-ecological systems are complex adaptive systems with nonlinear changing properties and multi-scale dynamics. They are influenced by unpredictable coastal hazards accentuated by the effects of climate change, and they can quickly be altered if critical thresholds are crossed. Additional...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philippe Sauvé, Pascal Bernatchez, Mathias Glaus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.845348/full
_version_ 1818480223850594304
author Philippe Sauvé
Philippe Sauvé
Pascal Bernatchez
Pascal Bernatchez
Pascal Bernatchez
Mathias Glaus
author_facet Philippe Sauvé
Philippe Sauvé
Pascal Bernatchez
Pascal Bernatchez
Pascal Bernatchez
Mathias Glaus
author_sort Philippe Sauvé
collection DOAJ
description Coastal socio-ecological systems are complex adaptive systems with nonlinear changing properties and multi-scale dynamics. They are influenced by unpredictable coastal hazards accentuated by the effects of climate change, and they can quickly be altered if critical thresholds are crossed. Additional pressures come from coastal activities and development, both of which attracting stakeholders with different perspectives and interests. While coastal defence measures (CDMs) have been implemented to mitigate coastal hazards for centuries, a lack of knowledge and tools available to make informed decision has led to coastal managers favouring the choice of seawalls or rock armours with little consideration for socio-ecological systems features, and stakeholders’ priorities. Though it is not currently widely applied in coastal zone management, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a tool that can be useful to facilitate decision making. PROMETHEE, an outranking method, was chosen to support the multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of CDMs in the context of four study sites characterized by distinct environmental features. The aim was to determine the relevance and benefits of a MCDA by integrating coastal zone stakeholders in a participatory decision-making process in order to select CDMs that are better adapted to the whole socio-ecological system. First, in a series of five workshops, stakeholders were asked to identify and weigh criteria that were relevant to their local conditions. Second and third, CDMs were evaluated in relation to each criterion within the local context, then, hierarchized. Initial results show that vegetation came first in three of the four sites, while rock armour ranked first in the fourth site. A post-evaluation of the participatory process indicated that the weighting phase is an effective way to integrate local knowledge into the decision-making process, but the identification of criteria could be streamlined by the presentation of a predefined list from which participants could make a selection. This would ensure criteria that are standardized, and in a format that is compatible with the MCDA. Coupled with a participatory process MCDA proved to be a flexible methodology that can synthetize multiple aspects of the problem, and contribute in a meaningful way to the coastal engineering and management decision-making process.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:20:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aafe0cee6e664e72b312e7c095151cb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:20:35Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-aafe0cee6e664e72b312e7c095151cb72022-12-22T01:50:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452022-04-01910.3389/fmars.2022.845348845348Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of CriteriaPhilippe Sauvé0Philippe Sauvé1Pascal Bernatchez2Pascal Bernatchez3Pascal Bernatchez4Mathias Glaus5Chaire de recherche en géosciences côtières, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, CanadaQuébec-Océan, Université Laval, Québec, QC, CanadaChaire de recherche en géosciences côtières, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, CanadaQuébec-Océan, Université Laval, Québec, QC, CanadaCentre d’études Nordiques (CEN), Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, CanadaLaboratoire de la STEPPE-ETS, École de technologie supérieure, Montréal, QC, CanadaCoastal socio-ecological systems are complex adaptive systems with nonlinear changing properties and multi-scale dynamics. They are influenced by unpredictable coastal hazards accentuated by the effects of climate change, and they can quickly be altered if critical thresholds are crossed. Additional pressures come from coastal activities and development, both of which attracting stakeholders with different perspectives and interests. While coastal defence measures (CDMs) have been implemented to mitigate coastal hazards for centuries, a lack of knowledge and tools available to make informed decision has led to coastal managers favouring the choice of seawalls or rock armours with little consideration for socio-ecological systems features, and stakeholders’ priorities. Though it is not currently widely applied in coastal zone management, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a tool that can be useful to facilitate decision making. PROMETHEE, an outranking method, was chosen to support the multicriteria decision analysis for the evaluation of CDMs in the context of four study sites characterized by distinct environmental features. The aim was to determine the relevance and benefits of a MCDA by integrating coastal zone stakeholders in a participatory decision-making process in order to select CDMs that are better adapted to the whole socio-ecological system. First, in a series of five workshops, stakeholders were asked to identify and weigh criteria that were relevant to their local conditions. Second and third, CDMs were evaluated in relation to each criterion within the local context, then, hierarchized. Initial results show that vegetation came first in three of the four sites, while rock armour ranked first in the fourth site. A post-evaluation of the participatory process indicated that the weighting phase is an effective way to integrate local knowledge into the decision-making process, but the identification of criteria could be streamlined by the presentation of a predefined list from which participants could make a selection. This would ensure criteria that are standardized, and in a format that is compatible with the MCDA. Coupled with a participatory process MCDA proved to be a flexible methodology that can synthetize multiple aspects of the problem, and contribute in a meaningful way to the coastal engineering and management decision-making process.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.845348/fullcoastal engineeringcoastal defence measuredecision-makingintegrated coastal zone management (ICZM)participatory processcoastal protection
spellingShingle Philippe Sauvé
Philippe Sauvé
Pascal Bernatchez
Pascal Bernatchez
Pascal Bernatchez
Mathias Glaus
Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria
Frontiers in Marine Science
coastal engineering
coastal defence measure
decision-making
integrated coastal zone management (ICZM)
participatory process
coastal protection
title Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria
title_full Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria
title_fullStr Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria
title_full_unstemmed Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria
title_short Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Assist in the Selection of Coastal Defence Measures: Involving Coastal Managers and Professionals in the Identification and Weighting of Criteria
title_sort multicriteria decision analysis to assist in the selection of coastal defence measures involving coastal managers and professionals in the identification and weighting of criteria
topic coastal engineering
coastal defence measure
decision-making
integrated coastal zone management (ICZM)
participatory process
coastal protection
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.845348/full
work_keys_str_mv AT philippesauve multicriteriadecisionanalysistoassistintheselectionofcoastaldefencemeasuresinvolvingcoastalmanagersandprofessionalsintheidentificationandweightingofcriteria
AT philippesauve multicriteriadecisionanalysistoassistintheselectionofcoastaldefencemeasuresinvolvingcoastalmanagersandprofessionalsintheidentificationandweightingofcriteria
AT pascalbernatchez multicriteriadecisionanalysistoassistintheselectionofcoastaldefencemeasuresinvolvingcoastalmanagersandprofessionalsintheidentificationandweightingofcriteria
AT pascalbernatchez multicriteriadecisionanalysistoassistintheselectionofcoastaldefencemeasuresinvolvingcoastalmanagersandprofessionalsintheidentificationandweightingofcriteria
AT pascalbernatchez multicriteriadecisionanalysistoassistintheselectionofcoastaldefencemeasuresinvolvingcoastalmanagersandprofessionalsintheidentificationandweightingofcriteria
AT mathiasglaus multicriteriadecisionanalysistoassistintheselectionofcoastaldefencemeasuresinvolvingcoastalmanagersandprofessionalsintheidentificationandweightingofcriteria