Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer

Purpose. The treatment of early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the benefit–risk balance to patients who underwent colectomy after endoscopic polypectomy of T1 carcinoma with unfavourable hi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikas Samuolis, Narimantas Evaldas Samalavičius, Ugnius Mickys
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius University Press 2015-05-01
Series:Acta Medica Lituanica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.journals.vu.lt/AML/article/view/21381
_version_ 1811272955983822848
author Nikas Samuolis
Narimantas Evaldas Samalavičius
Ugnius Mickys
author_facet Nikas Samuolis
Narimantas Evaldas Samalavičius
Ugnius Mickys
author_sort Nikas Samuolis
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. The treatment of early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the benefit–risk balance to patients who underwent colectomy after endoscopic polypectomy of T1 carcinoma with unfavourable histological factors. Methods. Thirty one patients (15  men and 16 women, median age 66 years) who underwent colectomy after endoscopic resection of malignant polyps with T1 carcinoma within the period from 1 January 2004 Vilnius to 11 February 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Specimens resected after endoscopic polypectomy showed at least one of the following unfavourable factors: no free margin or piecemeal resection. The main objective was to assess the benefit–risk balance of an oncological resection performed after the polypectomy. The oncological benefit was measured by the lymph node metastasis rate. The risk was measured by the occurrence of severe complications of grade III–IV or death. Results. The most common localisation of T1 cancer was sigmoid colon – 16 cases (51.6%) and upper rectum – 11 cases (35.5%). 11 (35.5%) patients had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (G1), others (20 patients from 31, 64.5%) had moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma (G2). The main indications of colectomy were two: the margin of resection ≤1 mm (n = 23) and piecemeal resection (n = 9). An oncological benefit of colectomy was reached for four patients (12.9%), who had lymph node metastasis. Six patients (19.4%) presented postoperative complications. All of them were of I–II grade according to the Clavien classification. There were no deaths. Conclusions. 12.9% of patients, who underwent oncological colectomy after endoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer with unfavourable histology (no free margin or piecemeal polypectomy), had metastasis in the lymph nodes; thus this study suggests the rationale of an oncological surgical resection after endoscopic polypectomy for these patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:49:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab12356fb8df4cada274b229a5a87973
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1392-0138
2029-4174
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:49:27Z
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format Article
series Acta Medica Lituanica
spelling doaj.art-ab12356fb8df4cada274b229a5a879732022-12-22T03:13:25ZengVilnius University PressActa Medica Lituanica1392-01382029-41742015-05-0122110.6001/actamedica.v22i1.3077Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancerNikas SamuolisNarimantas Evaldas SamalavičiusUgnius MickysPurpose. The treatment of early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma removed endoscopically depends on histopathologic findings. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the benefit–risk balance to patients who underwent colectomy after endoscopic polypectomy of T1 carcinoma with unfavourable histological factors. Methods. Thirty one patients (15  men and 16 women, median age 66 years) who underwent colectomy after endoscopic resection of malignant polyps with T1 carcinoma within the period from 1 January 2004 Vilnius to 11 February 2015 were included in this retrospective study. Specimens resected after endoscopic polypectomy showed at least one of the following unfavourable factors: no free margin or piecemeal resection. The main objective was to assess the benefit–risk balance of an oncological resection performed after the polypectomy. The oncological benefit was measured by the lymph node metastasis rate. The risk was measured by the occurrence of severe complications of grade III–IV or death. Results. The most common localisation of T1 cancer was sigmoid colon – 16 cases (51.6%) and upper rectum – 11 cases (35.5%). 11 (35.5%) patients had well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (G1), others (20 patients from 31, 64.5%) had moderate differentiated adenocarcinoma (G2). The main indications of colectomy were two: the margin of resection ≤1 mm (n = 23) and piecemeal resection (n = 9). An oncological benefit of colectomy was reached for four patients (12.9%), who had lymph node metastasis. Six patients (19.4%) presented postoperative complications. All of them were of I–II grade according to the Clavien classification. There were no deaths. Conclusions. 12.9% of patients, who underwent oncological colectomy after endoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer with unfavourable histology (no free margin or piecemeal polypectomy), had metastasis in the lymph nodes; thus this study suggests the rationale of an oncological surgical resection after endoscopic polypectomy for these patients.https://www.journals.vu.lt/AML/article/view/21381malignant colonic polypendoscopic polypectomylymph node metastasis
spellingShingle Nikas Samuolis
Narimantas Evaldas Samalavičius
Ugnius Mickys
Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer
Acta Medica Lituanica
malignant colonic polyp
endoscopic polypectomy
lymph node metastasis
title Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer
title_full Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer
title_fullStr Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer
title_full_unstemmed Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer
title_short Elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid T1 cancer
title_sort elective colectomy after colonoscopic polypectomy for unexpected polypoid t1 cancer
topic malignant colonic polyp
endoscopic polypectomy
lymph node metastasis
url https://www.journals.vu.lt/AML/article/view/21381
work_keys_str_mv AT nikassamuolis electivecolectomyaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyforunexpectedpolypoidt1cancer
AT narimantasevaldassamalavicius electivecolectomyaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyforunexpectedpolypoidt1cancer
AT ugniusmickys electivecolectomyaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyforunexpectedpolypoidt1cancer