Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model

Evapotranspiration (ET) is an essential part of the global water cycle, and accurate quantification of ET is of great significance for hydrological research and practice. The Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL) model is a commonly used remotely sensed (RS) ET model. The original PT-J...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zelin Luo, Mengjing Guo, Peng Bai, Jing Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-05-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/11/2573
_version_ 1797491906190508032
author Zelin Luo
Mengjing Guo
Peng Bai
Jing Li
author_facet Zelin Luo
Mengjing Guo
Peng Bai
Jing Li
author_sort Zelin Luo
collection DOAJ
description Evapotranspiration (ET) is an essential part of the global water cycle, and accurate quantification of ET is of great significance for hydrological research and practice. The Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL) model is a commonly used remotely sensed (RS) ET model. The original PT-JPL model includes multiple vegetation variables but only requires the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) as the vegetation input. Other vegetation inputs (e.g., Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)) are estimated by the NDVI-based empirical methods. Here we investigate whether introducing more RS vegetation variables beyond NDVI can improve the PT-JPL model’s performance. We combine the vegetation variables derived from RS and empirical methods into four vegetation input schemes for the PT-JPL model. The model performance under four schemes is evaluated at the site scale with the eddy covariance (EC)-based ET measurements and at the basin scale with the water balance-based ET estimates. The results show that the vegetation variables derived by RS and empirical methods are quite different. The ecophysiological constraints of the PT-JPL model constructed by the former are more reasonable in spatial distribution than those constructed by the latter. However, as vegetation input of the PT-JPL model, the scheme derived from empirical methods performs best among the four schemes. In other words, introducing more remotely sensed vegetation variables beyond NDVI into the PT-JPL model degrades the model performance to varying degrees. One possible reason for this is the unrealistic ET partitioning. It is necessary to re-parameterize the biophysical constraints of the PT-JPL model to ensure that the model obtains reasonable internal process simulations, that is, “getting the right results for right reasons.”
first_indexed 2024-03-10T00:55:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab13d91ab43349529bba887326bb26ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T00:55:59Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-ab13d91ab43349529bba887326bb26ab2023-11-23T14:43:53ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922022-05-011411257310.3390/rs14112573Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL ModelZelin Luo0Mengjing Guo1Peng Bai2Jing Li3State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, ChinaKey Laboratory of Water Cycle and Related Land Surface Processes, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, ChinaEvapotranspiration (ET) is an essential part of the global water cycle, and accurate quantification of ET is of great significance for hydrological research and practice. The Priestley-Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory (PT-JPL) model is a commonly used remotely sensed (RS) ET model. The original PT-JPL model includes multiple vegetation variables but only requires the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) as the vegetation input. Other vegetation inputs (e.g., Leaf Area Index (LAI) and Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR)) are estimated by the NDVI-based empirical methods. Here we investigate whether introducing more RS vegetation variables beyond NDVI can improve the PT-JPL model’s performance. We combine the vegetation variables derived from RS and empirical methods into four vegetation input schemes for the PT-JPL model. The model performance under four schemes is evaluated at the site scale with the eddy covariance (EC)-based ET measurements and at the basin scale with the water balance-based ET estimates. The results show that the vegetation variables derived by RS and empirical methods are quite different. The ecophysiological constraints of the PT-JPL model constructed by the former are more reasonable in spatial distribution than those constructed by the latter. However, as vegetation input of the PT-JPL model, the scheme derived from empirical methods performs best among the four schemes. In other words, introducing more remotely sensed vegetation variables beyond NDVI into the PT-JPL model degrades the model performance to varying degrees. One possible reason for this is the unrealistic ET partitioning. It is necessary to re-parameterize the biophysical constraints of the PT-JPL model to ensure that the model obtains reasonable internal process simulations, that is, “getting the right results for right reasons.”https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/11/2573evapotranspirationPT-JPL modelvegetation variablesremote sensing
spellingShingle Zelin Luo
Mengjing Guo
Peng Bai
Jing Li
Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model
Remote Sensing
evapotranspiration
PT-JPL model
vegetation variables
remote sensing
title Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model
title_full Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model
title_fullStr Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model
title_full_unstemmed Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model
title_short Different Vegetation Information Inputs Significantly Affect the Evapotranspiration Simulations of the PT-JPL Model
title_sort different vegetation information inputs significantly affect the evapotranspiration simulations of the pt jpl model
topic evapotranspiration
PT-JPL model
vegetation variables
remote sensing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/11/2573
work_keys_str_mv AT zelinluo differentvegetationinformationinputssignificantlyaffecttheevapotranspirationsimulationsoftheptjplmodel
AT mengjingguo differentvegetationinformationinputssignificantlyaffecttheevapotranspirationsimulationsoftheptjplmodel
AT pengbai differentvegetationinformationinputssignificantlyaffecttheevapotranspirationsimulationsoftheptjplmodel
AT jingli differentvegetationinformationinputssignificantlyaffecttheevapotranspirationsimulationsoftheptjplmodel