Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage

Background/Aims: To compare the survival benefits of surgical resection (SR) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, a total of...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
Main Authors: Bin Yu, Youming Ding, Xiaofeng Liao, Changhua Wang, Bin Wang, Xiaoyan Chen
格式: 文件
语言:English
出版: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
丛编:The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
主题:
在线阅读:http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2018;volume=24;issue=6;spage=317;epage=325;aulast=Yu
_version_ 1828161825608302592
author Bin Yu
Youming Ding
Xiaofeng Liao
Changhua Wang
Bin Wang
Xiaoyan Chen
author_facet Bin Yu
Youming Ding
Xiaofeng Liao
Changhua Wang
Bin Wang
Xiaoyan Chen
author_sort Bin Yu
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aims: To compare the survival benefits of surgical resection (SR) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, a total of 461 patients who underwent SR and 575 patients who underwent RFA were enrolled from 2004 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) and liver-cancer-specific survival (LCSS) comparisons were conducted between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).Results: Elderly patients with early-stage HCC had a lower rate of utilization of liver transplantation, and they were more likely to receive SR or RFA as their first-line treatment compared with younger patients (P < 0.05). In the whole cohort, the SR group had significantly better OS [RFA, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.680 (1.390, 2.031), P < 0.001] and LCSS (RFA, HR = 1.658 (1.327, 2.070), P < 0.001) than the RFA group. After PSM, the improved survival in the SR group was further confirmed (all P < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, according to patients' age (65–75, >75 years) and tumor size (≤3.0, 3.1–5.0 cm), the SR group still presented better OS and LCSS than the RFA group (all P < 0.05), except for those older than 75 years with tumors ≤3.0 cm (all P > 0.05), both before and after PSM. Conclusion: Treatment strategies for elderly patients (≥65 years) with single HCC ≤5 cm should emphasize SR as the primary therapy, while RFA can be an alternative to SR for those> 75 years with single HCC ≤3 cm.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:45:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab1faba3b51c4ecb983dda8befc4fac3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1319-3767
1998-4049
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:45:12Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-ab1faba3b51c4ecb983dda8befc4fac32022-12-22T03:54:54ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsThe Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology1319-37671998-40492018-01-0124631732510.4103/sjg.SJG_261_18Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortageBin YuYouming DingXiaofeng LiaoChanghua WangBin WangXiaoyan ChenBackground/Aims: To compare the survival benefits of surgical resection (SR) with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤5 cm. Patients and Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, a total of 461 patients who underwent SR and 575 patients who underwent RFA were enrolled from 2004 to 2012. Overall survival (OS) and liver-cancer-specific survival (LCSS) comparisons were conducted between the two groups before and after propensity score matching (PSM).Results: Elderly patients with early-stage HCC had a lower rate of utilization of liver transplantation, and they were more likely to receive SR or RFA as their first-line treatment compared with younger patients (P < 0.05). In the whole cohort, the SR group had significantly better OS [RFA, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.680 (1.390, 2.031), P < 0.001] and LCSS (RFA, HR = 1.658 (1.327, 2.070), P < 0.001) than the RFA group. After PSM, the improved survival in the SR group was further confirmed (all P < 0.001). In the subgroup analyses, according to patients' age (65–75, >75 years) and tumor size (≤3.0, 3.1–5.0 cm), the SR group still presented better OS and LCSS than the RFA group (all P < 0.05), except for those older than 75 years with tumors ≤3.0 cm (all P > 0.05), both before and after PSM. Conclusion: Treatment strategies for elderly patients (≥65 years) with single HCC ≤5 cm should emphasize SR as the primary therapy, while RFA can be an alternative to SR for those> 75 years with single HCC ≤3 cm.http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2018;volume=24;issue=6;spage=317;epage=325;aulast=YuElderly patientshepatocellular carcinomaprognosisradiofrequency ablationsurgical resection
spellingShingle Bin Yu
Youming Ding
Xiaofeng Liao
Changhua Wang
Bin Wang
Xiaoyan Chen
Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
The Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Elderly patients
hepatocellular carcinoma
prognosis
radiofrequency ablation
surgical resection
title Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
title_full Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
title_fullStr Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
title_full_unstemmed Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
title_short Radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
title_sort radiofrequency ablation versus surgical resection in elderly patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of organ shortage
topic Elderly patients
hepatocellular carcinoma
prognosis
radiofrequency ablation
surgical resection
url http://www.saudijgastro.com/article.asp?issn=1319-3767;year=2018;volume=24;issue=6;spage=317;epage=325;aulast=Yu
work_keys_str_mv AT binyu radiofrequencyablationversussurgicalresectioninelderlypatientswithearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaintheeraoforganshortage
AT youmingding radiofrequencyablationversussurgicalresectioninelderlypatientswithearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaintheeraoforganshortage
AT xiaofengliao radiofrequencyablationversussurgicalresectioninelderlypatientswithearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaintheeraoforganshortage
AT changhuawang radiofrequencyablationversussurgicalresectioninelderlypatientswithearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaintheeraoforganshortage
AT binwang radiofrequencyablationversussurgicalresectioninelderlypatientswithearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaintheeraoforganshortage
AT xiaoyanchen radiofrequencyablationversussurgicalresectioninelderlypatientswithearlystagehepatocellularcarcinomaintheeraoforganshortage