Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador

Atmospheric sulfur deposition above certain limits can represent a threat to tropical forests, causing nutrient imbalances and mobilizing toxic elements that impact biodiversity and forest productivity. Atmospheric sources of sulfur deposited by precipitation have been roughly identified in only a f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Makowski Giannoni, R. Rollenbeck, K. Trachte, J. Bendix
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-10-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/11297/2014/acp-14-11297-2014.pdf
_version_ 1818163919127052288
author S. Makowski Giannoni
R. Rollenbeck
K. Trachte
J. Bendix
author_facet S. Makowski Giannoni
R. Rollenbeck
K. Trachte
J. Bendix
author_sort S. Makowski Giannoni
collection DOAJ
description Atmospheric sulfur deposition above certain limits can represent a threat to tropical forests, causing nutrient imbalances and mobilizing toxic elements that impact biodiversity and forest productivity. Atmospheric sources of sulfur deposited by precipitation have been roughly identified in only a few lowland tropical forests. Even scarcer are studies of this type in tropical mountain forests, many of them mega-diversity hotspots and especially vulnerable to acidic deposition. In these places, the topographic complexity and related streamflow conditions affect the origin, type, and intensity of deposition. Furthermore, in regions with a variety of natural and anthropogenic sulfur sources, like active volcanoes and biomass burning, no source emission data has been used for determining the contribution of each source to the deposition. The main goal of the current study is to evaluate sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>-</sup> deposition by rain and occult precipitation at two topographic locations in a tropical mountain forest of southern Ecuador, and to trace back the deposition to possible emission sources applying back-trajectory modeling. To link upwind natural (volcanic) and anthropogenic (urban/industrial and biomass-burning) sulfur emissions and observed sulfate deposition, we employed state-of-the-art inventory and satellite data, including volcanic passive degassing as well. We conclude that biomass-burning sources generally dominate sulfate deposition at the evaluated sites. Minor sulfate transport occurs during the shifting of the predominant winds to the north and west. Occult precipitation sulfate deposition and likely rain sulfate deposition are mainly linked to biomass-burning emissions from the Amazon lowlands. Volcanic and anthropogenic emissions from the north and west contribute to occult precipitation sulfate deposition at the mountain crest Cerro del Consuelo meteorological station and to rain-deposited sulfate at the upriver mountain pass El Tiro meteorological station.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T16:57:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab2677c963ff4165b9eb124dfa171bc5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T16:57:12Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
spelling doaj.art-ab2677c963ff4165b9eb124dfa171bc52022-12-22T00:57:56ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242014-10-011420112971131210.5194/acp-14-11297-2014Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern EcuadorS. Makowski Giannoni0R. Rollenbeck1K. Trachte2J. Bendix3Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing (LCRS), Faculty of Geography, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstr. 12, 35032 Marburg, GermanyLaboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing (LCRS), Faculty of Geography, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstr. 12, 35032 Marburg, GermanyLaboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing (LCRS), Faculty of Geography, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstr. 12, 35032 Marburg, GermanyLaboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing (LCRS), Faculty of Geography, University of Marburg, Deutschhausstr. 12, 35032 Marburg, GermanyAtmospheric sulfur deposition above certain limits can represent a threat to tropical forests, causing nutrient imbalances and mobilizing toxic elements that impact biodiversity and forest productivity. Atmospheric sources of sulfur deposited by precipitation have been roughly identified in only a few lowland tropical forests. Even scarcer are studies of this type in tropical mountain forests, many of them mega-diversity hotspots and especially vulnerable to acidic deposition. In these places, the topographic complexity and related streamflow conditions affect the origin, type, and intensity of deposition. Furthermore, in regions with a variety of natural and anthropogenic sulfur sources, like active volcanoes and biomass burning, no source emission data has been used for determining the contribution of each source to the deposition. The main goal of the current study is to evaluate sulfate (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>-</sup> deposition by rain and occult precipitation at two topographic locations in a tropical mountain forest of southern Ecuador, and to trace back the deposition to possible emission sources applying back-trajectory modeling. To link upwind natural (volcanic) and anthropogenic (urban/industrial and biomass-burning) sulfur emissions and observed sulfate deposition, we employed state-of-the-art inventory and satellite data, including volcanic passive degassing as well. We conclude that biomass-burning sources generally dominate sulfate deposition at the evaluated sites. Minor sulfate transport occurs during the shifting of the predominant winds to the north and west. Occult precipitation sulfate deposition and likely rain sulfate deposition are mainly linked to biomass-burning emissions from the Amazon lowlands. Volcanic and anthropogenic emissions from the north and west contribute to occult precipitation sulfate deposition at the mountain crest Cerro del Consuelo meteorological station and to rain-deposited sulfate at the upriver mountain pass El Tiro meteorological station.http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/11297/2014/acp-14-11297-2014.pdf
spellingShingle S. Makowski Giannoni
R. Rollenbeck
K. Trachte
J. Bendix
Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
title Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador
title_full Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador
title_fullStr Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador
title_short Natural or anthropogenic? On the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the Andes of southeastern Ecuador
title_sort natural or anthropogenic on the origin of atmospheric sulfate deposition in the andes of southeastern ecuador
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/14/11297/2014/acp-14-11297-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT smakowskigiannoni naturaloranthropogenicontheoriginofatmosphericsulfatedepositionintheandesofsoutheasternecuador
AT rrollenbeck naturaloranthropogenicontheoriginofatmosphericsulfatedepositionintheandesofsoutheasternecuador
AT ktrachte naturaloranthropogenicontheoriginofatmosphericsulfatedepositionintheandesofsoutheasternecuador
AT jbendix naturaloranthropogenicontheoriginofatmosphericsulfatedepositionintheandesofsoutheasternecuador