In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
There has been much hype, over the past few years, about the recent progress of artificial intelligence (AI), especially through machine learning. If one is to believe many of the headlines that have proliferated in the media, as well as in an increasing number of scientific publications, it would s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Europe's Journal of Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1823 |
_version_ | 1797965071777792000 |
---|---|
author | Constance de Saint Laurent |
author_facet | Constance de Saint Laurent |
author_sort | Constance de Saint Laurent |
collection | DOAJ |
description | There has been much hype, over the past few years, about the recent progress of artificial intelligence (AI), especially through machine learning. If one is to believe many of the headlines that have proliferated in the media, as well as in an increasing number of scientific publications, it would seem that AI is now capable of creating and learning in ways that are starting to resemble what humans can do. And so that we should start to hope – or fear – that the creation of fully cognisant machine might be something we will witness in our life time. However, much of these beliefs are based on deep misconceptions about what AI can do, and how. In this paper, I start with a brief introduction to the principles of AI, machine learning, and neural networks, primarily intended for psychologists and social scientists, who often have much to contribute to the debates surrounding AI but lack a clear understanding of what it can currently do and how it works. I then debunk four common myths associated with AI: 1) it can create, 2) it can learn, 3) it is neutral and objective, and 4) it can solve ethically and/or culturally sensitive problems. In a third and last section, I argue that these misconceptions represent four main dangers: 1) avoiding debate, 2) naturalising our biases, 3) deresponsibilising creators and users, and 4) missing out some of the potential uses of machine learning. I finally conclude on the potential benefits of using machine learning in research, and thus on the need to defend machine learning without romanticising what it can actually do. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T01:54:26Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ab2d5b27a5264c47aecd43adf30a1bb0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1841-0413 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T01:54:26Z |
publishDate | 2018-11-01 |
publisher | PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology |
record_format | Article |
series | Europe's Journal of Psychology |
spelling | doaj.art-ab2d5b27a5264c47aecd43adf30a1bb02023-01-03T05:36:20ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologyEurope's Journal of Psychology1841-04132018-11-0114473474710.5964/ejop.v14i4.1823ejop.v14i4.1823In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial IntelligenceConstance de Saint Laurent0Department of Information Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyThere has been much hype, over the past few years, about the recent progress of artificial intelligence (AI), especially through machine learning. If one is to believe many of the headlines that have proliferated in the media, as well as in an increasing number of scientific publications, it would seem that AI is now capable of creating and learning in ways that are starting to resemble what humans can do. And so that we should start to hope – or fear – that the creation of fully cognisant machine might be something we will witness in our life time. However, much of these beliefs are based on deep misconceptions about what AI can do, and how. In this paper, I start with a brief introduction to the principles of AI, machine learning, and neural networks, primarily intended for psychologists and social scientists, who often have much to contribute to the debates surrounding AI but lack a clear understanding of what it can currently do and how it works. I then debunk four common myths associated with AI: 1) it can create, 2) it can learn, 3) it is neutral and objective, and 4) it can solve ethically and/or culturally sensitive problems. In a third and last section, I argue that these misconceptions represent four main dangers: 1) avoiding debate, 2) naturalising our biases, 3) deresponsibilising creators and users, and 4) missing out some of the potential uses of machine learning. I finally conclude on the potential benefits of using machine learning in research, and thus on the need to defend machine learning without romanticising what it can actually do.http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1823artificial intelligencemachine learningneural networkslearningcreativitybiasethics |
spellingShingle | Constance de Saint Laurent In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence Europe's Journal of Psychology artificial intelligence machine learning neural networks learning creativity bias ethics |
title | In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence |
title_full | In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence |
title_fullStr | In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence |
title_short | In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence |
title_sort | in defence of machine learning debunking the myths of artificial intelligence |
topic | artificial intelligence machine learning neural networks learning creativity bias ethics |
url | http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1823 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT constancedesaintlaurent indefenceofmachinelearningdebunkingthemythsofartificialintelligence |