In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence

There has been much hype, over the past few years, about the recent progress of artificial intelligence (AI), especially through machine learning. If one is to believe many of the headlines that have proliferated in the media, as well as in an increasing number of scientific publications, it would s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Constance de Saint Laurent
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology 2018-11-01
Series:Europe's Journal of Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1823
_version_ 1797965071777792000
author Constance de Saint Laurent
author_facet Constance de Saint Laurent
author_sort Constance de Saint Laurent
collection DOAJ
description There has been much hype, over the past few years, about the recent progress of artificial intelligence (AI), especially through machine learning. If one is to believe many of the headlines that have proliferated in the media, as well as in an increasing number of scientific publications, it would seem that AI is now capable of creating and learning in ways that are starting to resemble what humans can do. And so that we should start to hope – or fear – that the creation of fully cognisant machine might be something we will witness in our life time. However, much of these beliefs are based on deep misconceptions about what AI can do, and how. In this paper, I start with a brief introduction to the principles of AI, machine learning, and neural networks, primarily intended for psychologists and social scientists, who often have much to contribute to the debates surrounding AI but lack a clear understanding of what it can currently do and how it works. I then debunk four common myths associated with AI: 1) it can create, 2) it can learn, 3) it is neutral and objective, and 4) it can solve ethically and/or culturally sensitive problems. In a third and last section, I argue that these misconceptions represent four main dangers: 1) avoiding debate, 2) naturalising our biases, 3) deresponsibilising creators and users, and 4) missing out some of the potential uses of machine learning. I finally conclude on the potential benefits of using machine learning in research, and thus on the need to defend machine learning without romanticising what it can actually do.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:54:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab2d5b27a5264c47aecd43adf30a1bb0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1841-0413
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:54:26Z
publishDate 2018-11-01
publisher PsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for Psychology
record_format Article
series Europe's Journal of Psychology
spelling doaj.art-ab2d5b27a5264c47aecd43adf30a1bb02023-01-03T05:36:20ZengPsychOpen GOLD/ Leibniz Institute for PsychologyEurope's Journal of Psychology1841-04132018-11-0114473474710.5964/ejop.v14i4.1823ejop.v14i4.1823In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial IntelligenceConstance de Saint Laurent0Department of Information Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyThere has been much hype, over the past few years, about the recent progress of artificial intelligence (AI), especially through machine learning. If one is to believe many of the headlines that have proliferated in the media, as well as in an increasing number of scientific publications, it would seem that AI is now capable of creating and learning in ways that are starting to resemble what humans can do. And so that we should start to hope – or fear – that the creation of fully cognisant machine might be something we will witness in our life time. However, much of these beliefs are based on deep misconceptions about what AI can do, and how. In this paper, I start with a brief introduction to the principles of AI, machine learning, and neural networks, primarily intended for psychologists and social scientists, who often have much to contribute to the debates surrounding AI but lack a clear understanding of what it can currently do and how it works. I then debunk four common myths associated with AI: 1) it can create, 2) it can learn, 3) it is neutral and objective, and 4) it can solve ethically and/or culturally sensitive problems. In a third and last section, I argue that these misconceptions represent four main dangers: 1) avoiding debate, 2) naturalising our biases, 3) deresponsibilising creators and users, and 4) missing out some of the potential uses of machine learning. I finally conclude on the potential benefits of using machine learning in research, and thus on the need to defend machine learning without romanticising what it can actually do.http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1823artificial intelligencemachine learningneural networkslearningcreativitybiasethics
spellingShingle Constance de Saint Laurent
In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
Europe's Journal of Psychology
artificial intelligence
machine learning
neural networks
learning
creativity
bias
ethics
title In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
title_full In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
title_fullStr In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
title_short In Defence of Machine Learning: Debunking the Myths of Artificial Intelligence
title_sort in defence of machine learning debunking the myths of artificial intelligence
topic artificial intelligence
machine learning
neural networks
learning
creativity
bias
ethics
url http://ejop.psychopen.eu/article/view/1823
work_keys_str_mv AT constancedesaintlaurent indefenceofmachinelearningdebunkingthemythsofartificialintelligence