From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions

In both academic and policy circles international interventions tend to mean ‘military’ interventions and debates tend to focus on whether such interventions are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ in general. This article aims to open up scholarly engagement on the topic of the thorny reality of interventions in diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mary Kaldor, Sabine Selchow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre for Security Governance 2015-05-01
Series:Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/313
_version_ 1818315838068883456
author Mary Kaldor
Sabine Selchow
author_facet Mary Kaldor
Sabine Selchow
author_sort Mary Kaldor
collection DOAJ
description In both academic and policy circles international interventions tend to mean ‘military’ interventions and debates tend to focus on whether such interventions are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ in general. This article aims to open up scholarly engagement on the topic of the thorny reality of interventions in different contexts by reconceptualising international interventions as ‘security interventions.’ The article draws attention to the ambiguous meaning of ‘security’ as both an objective (i.e. safety) as well as a practice (military forces, police, intelligence agencies and their tactics), something that is reflected in the different approaches to be gleaned from the security studies literature. From this ambiguity, it derives two interlinked concepts: ‘security culture’ and ‘security gap,’ as analytical tools to grasp the complexity of international interventions. The concept of ‘security culture’ captures specific combinations of objectives and practices. The concept of ‘security gap’ captures the particular relationship or the distinct kind of ‘mismatch’ between objectives and practices as it occurs in a ‘security culture.’ This reading of international interventions through the concept of ‘security culture’ and the interlinked analytical tool ‘security gap’ allows an analysis and understanding that goes beyond simplistic assumptions both about traditional military capabilities and the role of the ‘international community’ as a unitary actor.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T09:11:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab3590c0215f415f83607f187fdce78a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2165-2627
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T09:11:53Z
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Centre for Security Governance
record_format Article
series Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
spelling doaj.art-ab3590c0215f415f83607f187fdce78a2022-12-21T23:52:55ZengCentre for Security GovernanceStability : International Journal of Security and Development2165-26272015-05-014110.5334/sta.fu178From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary InterventionsMary Kaldor0Sabine Selchow1London School of EconomicsLondon School of EconomicsIn both academic and policy circles international interventions tend to mean ‘military’ interventions and debates tend to focus on whether such interventions are ‘good’ or ‘bad’ in general. This article aims to open up scholarly engagement on the topic of the thorny reality of interventions in different contexts by reconceptualising international interventions as ‘security interventions.’ The article draws attention to the ambiguous meaning of ‘security’ as both an objective (i.e. safety) as well as a practice (military forces, police, intelligence agencies and their tactics), something that is reflected in the different approaches to be gleaned from the security studies literature. From this ambiguity, it derives two interlinked concepts: ‘security culture’ and ‘security gap,’ as analytical tools to grasp the complexity of international interventions. The concept of ‘security culture’ captures specific combinations of objectives and practices. The concept of ‘security gap’ captures the particular relationship or the distinct kind of ‘mismatch’ between objectives and practices as it occurs in a ‘security culture.’ This reading of international interventions through the concept of ‘security culture’ and the interlinked analytical tool ‘security gap’ allows an analysis and understanding that goes beyond simplistic assumptions both about traditional military capabilities and the role of the ‘international community’ as a unitary actor.http://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/313securityinternational interventionsresponsibility to protectsecurity culturesecurity gapnational security
spellingShingle Mary Kaldor
Sabine Selchow
From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions
Stability : International Journal of Security and Development
security
international interventions
responsibility to protect
security culture
security gap
national security
title From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions
title_full From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions
title_fullStr From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions
title_full_unstemmed From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions
title_short From Military to ‘Security Interventions’: An Alternative Approach to Contemporary Interventions
title_sort from military to security interventions an alternative approach to contemporary interventions
topic security
international interventions
responsibility to protect
security culture
security gap
national security
url http://www.stabilityjournal.org/articles/313
work_keys_str_mv AT marykaldor frommilitarytosecurityinterventionsanalternativeapproachtocontemporaryinterventions
AT sabineselchow frommilitarytosecurityinterventionsanalternativeapproachtocontemporaryinterventions