Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery
Expediency and efficiency of use of natural gas motor fuel (GMF) for mobile agricultural machinery is defined on the basis of alternative calculations of commercial effectiveness of use of the compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG) and the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in large ag...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Russian |
| Published: |
Federal Scientific Agroengineering Centre VIM
2015-02-01
|
| Series: | Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/49 |
| _version_ | 1797872230976192512 |
|---|---|
| author | G. S. Savel’Ev M. N. Kochetkov E. V. Ovchinnikov |
| author_facet | G. S. Savel’Ev M. N. Kochetkov E. V. Ovchinnikov |
| author_sort | G. S. Savel’Ev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Expediency and efficiency of use of natural gas motor fuel (GMF) for mobile agricultural machinery is defined on the basis of alternative calculations of commercial effectiveness of use of the compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG) and the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in large agricultural enterprise «Kazminskoye» in the Stavropol Territory where costs of fuel for machines and tractors make 222.5 million rubles a year. Need of field gas refueling of tractors and combines as a specifics fuel utilization by mobile agricultural machinery was considered at calculations. For an assessment of a type of GMF and influence of cost of a refueling complex on commercial effectiveness the authors have carried out comparative calculations of technical and economic efficiency of utilization of CNG, LNG and LPG, taking into account and without a refueling complex. High efficiency of GMF utilization was showed: fuel costs decrease by 1.7 times, the payback period of capital investments equals to 0.4-4.2 years. The best results were obtained when utilization LPG. Total costs of re-equipment and a refueling complex in option with LPG are 3.5 times as less as with CNG, and 6 times as less as with LNG. The payback period of capital investments for re-equipment without refueling complex equals to 0.4; 0.8 and 2.4 years respectively for LPG, CNG and LNG. Taking into account refueling means it increases to 0.9; 2.4 and 4.2 years. In 10 years the net present value taking into account refueling means equals to 276.7 million; 289.9 million and 206.8 million rubles for LPG, CNG and LNG respectively due to fleet re-equipment. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:56:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ab36023598414bc3ae0309acf3fa053e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-7599 |
| language | Russian |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T00:56:36Z |
| publishDate | 2015-02-01 |
| publisher | Federal Scientific Agroengineering Centre VIM |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии |
| spelling | doaj.art-ab36023598414bc3ae0309acf3fa053e2023-03-13T10:16:45ZrusFederal Scientific Agroengineering Centre VIMСельскохозяйственные машины и технологии2073-75992015-02-0101121548Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machineryG. S. Savel’Ev0M. N. Kochetkov1E. V. Ovchinnikov2Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт механизации сельского хозяйстваВсероссийский научно-исследовательский институт механизации сельского хозяйстваВсероссийский научно-исследовательский институт механизации сельского хозяйстваExpediency and efficiency of use of natural gas motor fuel (GMF) for mobile agricultural machinery is defined on the basis of alternative calculations of commercial effectiveness of use of the compressed natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG) and the liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in large agricultural enterprise «Kazminskoye» in the Stavropol Territory where costs of fuel for machines and tractors make 222.5 million rubles a year. Need of field gas refueling of tractors and combines as a specifics fuel utilization by mobile agricultural machinery was considered at calculations. For an assessment of a type of GMF and influence of cost of a refueling complex on commercial effectiveness the authors have carried out comparative calculations of technical and economic efficiency of utilization of CNG, LNG and LPG, taking into account and without a refueling complex. High efficiency of GMF utilization was showed: fuel costs decrease by 1.7 times, the payback period of capital investments equals to 0.4-4.2 years. The best results were obtained when utilization LPG. Total costs of re-equipment and a refueling complex in option with LPG are 3.5 times as less as with CNG, and 6 times as less as with LNG. The payback period of capital investments for re-equipment without refueling complex equals to 0.4; 0.8 and 2.4 years respectively for LPG, CNG and LNG. Taking into account refueling means it increases to 0.9; 2.4 and 4.2 years. In 10 years the net present value taking into account refueling means equals to 276.7 million; 289.9 million and 206.8 million rubles for LPG, CNG and LNG respectively due to fleet re-equipment.https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/49газомоторное топливоальтернативные моторные топливакомпримированный природный газсжиженный природный газсжиженный углеводородный газсрок окупаемостиgas motor fuelalternative motor fuelscompressed natural gasliquefied natural gasliquefied petroleum gaspayback period |
| spellingShingle | G. S. Savel’Ev M. N. Kochetkov E. V. Ovchinnikov Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery Сельскохозяйственные машины и технологии газомоторное топливо альтернативные моторные топлива компримированный природный газ сжиженный природный газ сжиженный углеводородный газ срок окупаемости gas motor fuel alternative motor fuels compressed natural gas liquefied natural gas liquefied petroleum gas payback period |
| title | Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery |
| title_full | Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery |
| title_fullStr | Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery |
| title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery |
| title_short | Efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery |
| title_sort | efficiency of gas motor fuel for agricultural machinery |
| topic | газомоторное топливо альтернативные моторные топлива компримированный природный газ сжиженный природный газ сжиженный углеводородный газ срок окупаемости gas motor fuel alternative motor fuels compressed natural gas liquefied natural gas liquefied petroleum gas payback period |
| url | https://www.vimsmit.com/jour/article/view/49 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gssavelev efficiencyofgasmotorfuelforagriculturalmachinery AT mnkochetkov efficiencyofgasmotorfuelforagriculturalmachinery AT evovchinnikov efficiencyofgasmotorfuelforagriculturalmachinery |