The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models

Decades of research have probed the molecular and cellular mechanisms that control the immune response to malaria. Yet many studies offer conflicting results on the functional impact of innate immunity for controlling parasite replication early in infection. We conduct a meta-analysis to seek consen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alejandra Herbert Mainero, Philip J. Spence, Sarah E. Reece, Tsukushi Kamiya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Immunology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1171176/full
_version_ 1797743395736649728
author Alejandra Herbert Mainero
Philip J. Spence
Sarah E. Reece
Sarah E. Reece
Tsukushi Kamiya
Tsukushi Kamiya
Tsukushi Kamiya
author_facet Alejandra Herbert Mainero
Philip J. Spence
Sarah E. Reece
Sarah E. Reece
Tsukushi Kamiya
Tsukushi Kamiya
Tsukushi Kamiya
author_sort Alejandra Herbert Mainero
collection DOAJ
description Decades of research have probed the molecular and cellular mechanisms that control the immune response to malaria. Yet many studies offer conflicting results on the functional impact of innate immunity for controlling parasite replication early in infection. We conduct a meta-analysis to seek consensus on the effect of innate immunity on parasite replication, examining three different species of rodent malaria parasite. Screening published studies that span four decades of research we collate, curate, and statistically analyze infection dynamics in immune-deficient or -augmented mice to identify and quantify general trends and reveal sources of disagreement among studies. Additionally, we estimate whether host factors or experimental methodology shape the impact of immune perturbations on parasite burden. First, we detected meta-analytic mean effect sizes (absolute Cohen’s h) for the difference in parasite burden between treatment and control groups ranging from 0.1475 to 0.2321 across parasite species. This range is considered a small effect size and translates to a modest change in parasitaemia of roughly 7-12% on average at the peak of infection. Second, we reveal that variation across studies using P. chabaudi or P. yoelii is best explained by stochasticity (due to small sample sizes) rather than by host factors or experimental design. Third, we find that for P. berghei the impact of immune perturbation is increased when young or female mice are used and is greatest when effector molecules (as opposed to upstream signalling molecules) are disrupted (up to an 18% difference in peak parasitaemia). Finally, we find little evidence of publication bias suggesting that our results are robust. The small effect sizes we observe, across three parasite species, following experimental perturbations of the innate immune system may be explained by redundancy in a complex biological system or by incomplete (or inappropriate) data reporting for meta-analysis. Alternatively, our findings might indicate a need to re-evaluate the efficiency with which innate immunity controls parasite replication early in infection. Testing these hypotheses is necessary to translate understanding from model systems to human malaria.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T14:54:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab390f5c1f1a44ecb8245a89ac571f72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-3224
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T14:54:53Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Immunology
spelling doaj.art-ab390f5c1f1a44ecb8245a89ac571f722023-08-15T04:17:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Immunology1664-32242023-08-011410.3389/fimmu.2023.11711761171176The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent modelsAlejandra Herbert Mainero0Philip J. Spence1Sarah E. Reece2Sarah E. Reece3Tsukushi Kamiya4Tsukushi Kamiya5Tsukushi Kamiya6Institute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, Collège de France, Paris, FranceHRB, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, IrelandDecades of research have probed the molecular and cellular mechanisms that control the immune response to malaria. Yet many studies offer conflicting results on the functional impact of innate immunity for controlling parasite replication early in infection. We conduct a meta-analysis to seek consensus on the effect of innate immunity on parasite replication, examining three different species of rodent malaria parasite. Screening published studies that span four decades of research we collate, curate, and statistically analyze infection dynamics in immune-deficient or -augmented mice to identify and quantify general trends and reveal sources of disagreement among studies. Additionally, we estimate whether host factors or experimental methodology shape the impact of immune perturbations on parasite burden. First, we detected meta-analytic mean effect sizes (absolute Cohen’s h) for the difference in parasite burden between treatment and control groups ranging from 0.1475 to 0.2321 across parasite species. This range is considered a small effect size and translates to a modest change in parasitaemia of roughly 7-12% on average at the peak of infection. Second, we reveal that variation across studies using P. chabaudi or P. yoelii is best explained by stochasticity (due to small sample sizes) rather than by host factors or experimental design. Third, we find that for P. berghei the impact of immune perturbation is increased when young or female mice are used and is greatest when effector molecules (as opposed to upstream signalling molecules) are disrupted (up to an 18% difference in peak parasitaemia). Finally, we find little evidence of publication bias suggesting that our results are robust. The small effect sizes we observe, across three parasite species, following experimental perturbations of the innate immune system may be explained by redundancy in a complex biological system or by incomplete (or inappropriate) data reporting for meta-analysis. Alternatively, our findings might indicate a need to re-evaluate the efficiency with which innate immunity controls parasite replication early in infection. Testing these hypotheses is necessary to translate understanding from model systems to human malaria.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1171176/fullplasmodiummeta-analysiswithin-host dynamicsinnate immunityrodent malaria
spellingShingle Alejandra Herbert Mainero
Philip J. Spence
Sarah E. Reece
Sarah E. Reece
Tsukushi Kamiya
Tsukushi Kamiya
Tsukushi Kamiya
The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
Frontiers in Immunology
plasmodium
meta-analysis
within-host dynamics
innate immunity
rodent malaria
title The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
title_full The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
title_fullStr The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
title_full_unstemmed The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
title_short The impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
title_sort impact of innate immunity on malaria parasite infection dynamics in rodent models
topic plasmodium
meta-analysis
within-host dynamics
innate immunity
rodent malaria
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1171176/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandraherbertmainero theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT philipjspence theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT sarahereece theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT sarahereece theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT tsukushikamiya theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT tsukushikamiya theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT tsukushikamiya theimpactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT alejandraherbertmainero impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT philipjspence impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT sarahereece impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT sarahereece impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT tsukushikamiya impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT tsukushikamiya impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels
AT tsukushikamiya impactofinnateimmunityonmalariaparasiteinfectiondynamicsinrodentmodels