Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016
Abstract Background Health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines has been improving, specifically regarding the universal testing of suspected cases and the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) only for positive results (i.e., ‘test and treat’). Wh...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Malaria Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-020-03479-z |
_version_ | 1819007944271855616 |
---|---|
author | Beatrice Amboko Kasia Stepniewska Peter M. Macharia Beatrice Machini Philip Bejon Robert W. Snow Dejan Zurovac |
author_facet | Beatrice Amboko Kasia Stepniewska Peter M. Macharia Beatrice Machini Philip Bejon Robert W. Snow Dejan Zurovac |
author_sort | Beatrice Amboko |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines has been improving, specifically regarding the universal testing of suspected cases and the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) only for positive results (i.e., ‘test and treat’). Whether the improvements in compliance with ‘test and treat’ guidelines are consistent across different malaria endemicity areas has not been examined. Methods Data from 11 national, cross-sectional, outpatient malaria case-management surveys undertaken in Kenya from 2010 to 2016 were analysed. Four primary indicators (i.e., ‘test and treat’) and eight secondary indicators of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) dosing, dispensing, and counselling were measured. Mixed logistic regression models were used to analyse the annual trends in compliance with the indicators across the different malaria endemicity areas (i.e., from highest to lowest risk being lake endemic, coast endemic, highland epidemic, semi-arid seasonal transmission, and low risk). Results Compliance with all four ‘test and treat’ indicators significantly increased in the area with the highest malaria risk (i.e., lake endemic) as follows: testing of febrile patients (OR = 1.71 annually; 95% CI = 1.51–1.93), AL treatment for test-positive patients (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.26–1.92), no anti-malarial for test-negative patients (OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.65–2.54), and composite ‘test and treat’ compliance (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.61–2.01). In the low risk areas, only compliance with test-negative results significantly increased (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.61–3.19) while testing of febrile patients showed declining trends (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.79–1.01). Administration of the first AL dose at the facility significantly increased in the areas of lake endemic (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.76–3.10), coast endemic (OR = 5.02; 95% CI = 2.77–9.09) and semi-arid seasonal transmission (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.02–2.04). In areas of the lowest risk of transmission and highland epidemic zone, none of the AL dosing, dispensing, and counselling tasks significantly changed over time. Conclusions There is variability in health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across different malaria-risk areas in Kenya. Major improvements in areas of the highest risk have not been seen in low-risk areas. Interventions to improve practices should be targeted geographically. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T00:32:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ab415a77fb9f4dbb8dd953c5af0498c6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1475-2875 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T00:32:37Z |
publishDate | 2020-11-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Malaria Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-ab415a77fb9f4dbb8dd953c5af0498c62022-12-21T19:21:51ZengBMCMalaria Journal1475-28752020-11-0119111410.1186/s12936-020-03479-zTrends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016Beatrice Amboko0Kasia Stepniewska1Peter M. Macharia2Beatrice Machini3Philip Bejon4Robert W. Snow5Dejan Zurovac6KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeWorldWide Antimalarial Resistance NetworkKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeDivision of National Malaria Programme, Ministry of HealthKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeAbstract Background Health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines has been improving, specifically regarding the universal testing of suspected cases and the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) only for positive results (i.e., ‘test and treat’). Whether the improvements in compliance with ‘test and treat’ guidelines are consistent across different malaria endemicity areas has not been examined. Methods Data from 11 national, cross-sectional, outpatient malaria case-management surveys undertaken in Kenya from 2010 to 2016 were analysed. Four primary indicators (i.e., ‘test and treat’) and eight secondary indicators of artemether-lumefantrine (AL) dosing, dispensing, and counselling were measured. Mixed logistic regression models were used to analyse the annual trends in compliance with the indicators across the different malaria endemicity areas (i.e., from highest to lowest risk being lake endemic, coast endemic, highland epidemic, semi-arid seasonal transmission, and low risk). Results Compliance with all four ‘test and treat’ indicators significantly increased in the area with the highest malaria risk (i.e., lake endemic) as follows: testing of febrile patients (OR = 1.71 annually; 95% CI = 1.51–1.93), AL treatment for test-positive patients (OR = 1.56; 95% CI = 1.26–1.92), no anti-malarial for test-negative patients (OR = 2.04; 95% CI = 1.65–2.54), and composite ‘test and treat’ compliance (OR = 1.80; 95% CI = 1.61–2.01). In the low risk areas, only compliance with test-negative results significantly increased (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.61–3.19) while testing of febrile patients showed declining trends (OR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.79–1.01). Administration of the first AL dose at the facility significantly increased in the areas of lake endemic (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.76–3.10), coast endemic (OR = 5.02; 95% CI = 2.77–9.09) and semi-arid seasonal transmission (OR = 1.44; 95% CI = 1.02–2.04). In areas of the lowest risk of transmission and highland epidemic zone, none of the AL dosing, dispensing, and counselling tasks significantly changed over time. Conclusions There is variability in health workers' compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across different malaria-risk areas in Kenya. Major improvements in areas of the highest risk have not been seen in low-risk areas. Interventions to improve practices should be targeted geographically.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-020-03479-zMalariaOutpatientCase-managementMalaria endemicityCompliance‘Test and treat’ |
spellingShingle | Beatrice Amboko Kasia Stepniewska Peter M. Macharia Beatrice Machini Philip Bejon Robert W. Snow Dejan Zurovac Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016 Malaria Journal Malaria Outpatient Case-management Malaria endemicity Compliance ‘Test and treat’ |
title | Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016 |
title_full | Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016 |
title_fullStr | Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016 |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016 |
title_short | Trends in health workers’ compliance with outpatient malaria case-management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in Kenya, 2010–2016 |
title_sort | trends in health workers compliance with outpatient malaria case management guidelines across malaria epidemiological zones in kenya 2010 2016 |
topic | Malaria Outpatient Case-management Malaria endemicity Compliance ‘Test and treat’ |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12936-020-03479-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beatriceamboko trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 AT kasiastepniewska trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 AT petermmacharia trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 AT beatricemachini trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 AT philipbejon trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 AT robertwsnow trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 AT dejanzurovac trendsinhealthworkerscompliancewithoutpatientmalariacasemanagementguidelinesacrossmalariaepidemiologicalzonesinkenya20102016 |