Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019
Laboratory diagnosis is a crucial component in implementation of the set of anti-epidemic measures aimed at contagious animal disease control. The need for unswerving trust in the quality of laboratory performance is a matter of importance not only for service providers and customers, but also for i...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Da Vinci Media
2020-03-01
|
| Series: | Ветеринария сегодня |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/460 |
| _version_ | 1797224891237269504 |
|---|---|
| author | A. Yu. Sukharkov Z. B. Nikonova O. P. Byadovskaya A. S. Pershin M. I. Shulpin I. A. Chvala |
| author_facet | A. Yu. Sukharkov Z. B. Nikonova O. P. Byadovskaya A. S. Pershin M. I. Shulpin I. A. Chvala |
| author_sort | A. Yu. Sukharkov |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Laboratory diagnosis is a crucial component in implementation of the set of anti-epidemic measures aimed at contagious animal disease control. The need for unswerving trust in the quality of laboratory performance is a matter of importance not only for service providers and customers, but also for inspecting organizations, accreditation bodies, etc. that establish performance requirements for diagnostic laboratories. Incorrect laboratory test results can lead to a misdiagnosis and, therefore, to grave consequences. One of the forms of experimental verification of a laboratory’s performance with a view to determine the laboratory’s competence and to verify its compliance with accreditation criteria as part of inspection control of the laboratory’s activities is interlaboratory comparison. The laboratory can prove its competence at a particular time, as well as clearly demonstrate how stable the quality of its test results is by summarizing and analyzing the results of its participation in interlaboratory comparisons. The analysis of the results of the interlaboratory comparisons (programmes for detection of causative agents or antibodies to the causative agents of avian influenza, Newcastle disease, rabies, classical swine fever, African swine fever, bluetongue, lumpy skin disease) organized by the FGBI “ARRIAH” for the veterinary laboratories of the Russian Federation in 2018–2019 is presented. The results showed that most of the laboratories had passed the tests successfully. The results submitted by participants were unsatisfactory in some interlaboratory comparison programmes (rabies virus detection using fluorescent antibody technique; detection of avian influenza, classical swine fever and lumpy skin disease viruses using polymerase chain reaction). That highlights the need for those participants who failed the tests to improve their laboratory testing quality. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T02:49:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ab472329b62e4d06861867140227cc83 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2304-196X 2658-6959 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-24T14:00:19Z |
| publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
| publisher | Da Vinci Media |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ветеринария сегодня |
| spelling | doaj.art-ab472329b62e4d06861867140227cc832024-04-03T12:48:49ZengDa Vinci MediaВетеринария сегодня2304-196X2658-69592020-03-0101667010.29326/2304-196X-2020-1-32-66-70445Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019A. Yu. Sukharkov0Z. B. Nikonova1O. P. Byadovskaya2A. S. Pershin3M. I. Shulpin4I. A. Chvala5FGBI “Federal Centre for Animal Health” (FGBI “ARRIAH”)FGBI “Federal Centre for Animal Health” (FGBI “ARRIAH”)FGBI “Federal Centre for Animal Health” (FGBI “ARRIAH”)FGBI “Federal Centre for Animal Health” (FGBI “ARRIAH”)FGBI “Federal Centre for Animal Health” (FGBI “ARRIAH”)FGBI “Federal Centre for Animal Health” (FGBI “ARRIAH”)Laboratory diagnosis is a crucial component in implementation of the set of anti-epidemic measures aimed at contagious animal disease control. The need for unswerving trust in the quality of laboratory performance is a matter of importance not only for service providers and customers, but also for inspecting organizations, accreditation bodies, etc. that establish performance requirements for diagnostic laboratories. Incorrect laboratory test results can lead to a misdiagnosis and, therefore, to grave consequences. One of the forms of experimental verification of a laboratory’s performance with a view to determine the laboratory’s competence and to verify its compliance with accreditation criteria as part of inspection control of the laboratory’s activities is interlaboratory comparison. The laboratory can prove its competence at a particular time, as well as clearly demonstrate how stable the quality of its test results is by summarizing and analyzing the results of its participation in interlaboratory comparisons. The analysis of the results of the interlaboratory comparisons (programmes for detection of causative agents or antibodies to the causative agents of avian influenza, Newcastle disease, rabies, classical swine fever, African swine fever, bluetongue, lumpy skin disease) organized by the FGBI “ARRIAH” for the veterinary laboratories of the Russian Federation in 2018–2019 is presented. The results showed that most of the laboratories had passed the tests successfully. The results submitted by participants were unsatisfactory in some interlaboratory comparison programmes (rabies virus detection using fluorescent antibody technique; detection of avian influenza, classical swine fever and lumpy skin disease viruses using polymerase chain reaction). That highlights the need for those participants who failed the tests to improve their laboratory testing quality.https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/460interlaboratory comparisonsinfectious animal diseasespolymerase chain reactionenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayfluorescent antibody technique |
| spellingShingle | A. Yu. Sukharkov Z. B. Nikonova O. P. Byadovskaya A. S. Pershin M. I. Shulpin I. A. Chvala Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019 Ветеринария сегодня interlaboratory comparisons infectious animal diseases polymerase chain reaction enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay fluorescent antibody technique |
| title | Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019 |
| title_full | Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019 |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019 |
| title_short | Evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by FGBI “ARRIAH” in 2018–2019 |
| title_sort | evaluation of veterinary laboratory proficiency based on results of interlaboratory comparisons organized by fgbi arriah in 2018 2019 |
| topic | interlaboratory comparisons infectious animal diseases polymerase chain reaction enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay fluorescent antibody technique |
| url | https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/460 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ayusukharkov evaluationofveterinarylaboratoryproficiencybasedonresultsofinterlaboratorycomparisonsorganizedbyfgbiarriahin20182019 AT zbnikonova evaluationofveterinarylaboratoryproficiencybasedonresultsofinterlaboratorycomparisonsorganizedbyfgbiarriahin20182019 AT opbyadovskaya evaluationofveterinarylaboratoryproficiencybasedonresultsofinterlaboratorycomparisonsorganizedbyfgbiarriahin20182019 AT aspershin evaluationofveterinarylaboratoryproficiencybasedonresultsofinterlaboratorycomparisonsorganizedbyfgbiarriahin20182019 AT mishulpin evaluationofveterinarylaboratoryproficiencybasedonresultsofinterlaboratorycomparisonsorganizedbyfgbiarriahin20182019 AT iachvala evaluationofveterinarylaboratoryproficiencybasedonresultsofinterlaboratorycomparisonsorganizedbyfgbiarriahin20182019 |