Kritik des Stoizismus in Johann Michael von Loëns "Epicurische Sittenlehre die beste" (1751)

This article is a contribution to analysis of the critique of stoicism in the 18th century. The author suggests that the text of J. M. von Loën is intertwined with the trend initiated by Thomasius that was developed by Baumgarten and Meier. The terminology that is used by von Loën evidently suggests...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ewa Grzesiuk
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Szczecin University Press 2019-01-01
Series:Colloquia Germanica Stetinensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://wnus.edu.pl/cgs/de/issue/976/article/15271/
Description
Summary:This article is a contribution to analysis of the critique of stoicism in the 18th century. The author suggests that the text of J. M. von Loën is intertwined with the trend initiated by Thomasius that was developed by Baumgarten and Meier. The terminology that is used by von Loën evidently suggests genetic connotations with the terminology used by Baumgarten (“rauhe Sittenlehre/Tugend”), and the critical argumentation has the connection with the argumentation used by Meier, who has termed the stoic postulate of stifling emotions as a removal of half of humankind from a human being. Von Loën – similarly to Meier – is a proponent of the concept of a whole human being (“der ganze Mensch”) and he opts for the harmony of the soul (“Gemütsruhe”).
ISSN:2450-8543