The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan

Research question: How does the cost-related oocyte cryopreservation (OoC) vary by the facility in Japan, and what data is provided on the websites about OoC procedures? Design: Website survey. The websites of all 621 facilities that provide assistive reproductive technology registered in Japan were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hiromitsu Shirasawa, Yukiyo Kumazawa, Wataru Sato, Takuya Iwasawa, Kazue Togashi, Natsuki Ono, Ayaka Fujishima, Kazumasa Takahashi, Eri Maeda, Yukihiro Terada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023062825
_version_ 1797732880265248768
author Hiromitsu Shirasawa
Yukiyo Kumazawa
Wataru Sato
Takuya Iwasawa
Kazue Togashi
Natsuki Ono
Ayaka Fujishima
Kazumasa Takahashi
Eri Maeda
Yukihiro Terada
author_facet Hiromitsu Shirasawa
Yukiyo Kumazawa
Wataru Sato
Takuya Iwasawa
Kazue Togashi
Natsuki Ono
Ayaka Fujishima
Kazumasa Takahashi
Eri Maeda
Yukihiro Terada
author_sort Hiromitsu Shirasawa
collection DOAJ
description Research question: How does the cost-related oocyte cryopreservation (OoC) vary by the facility in Japan, and what data is provided on the websites about OoC procedures? Design: Website survey. The websites of all 621 facilities that provide assistive reproductive technology registered in Japan were surveyed in 2021. Data included the rates of explicit statements regarding the provision of OoC for only medical reasons (medical only group) or non-medical reasons (non-medical group). Based on whether or not facilities that perform OoC clearly stated the cost on their websites, we compared the costs of OoC and annual storage cost between medical only and non-medical groups. Furthermore, we examined the stated number of OoC procedures performed and their clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 621 facilities, 146 (23.5%) clearly stated that they offer OoC on their websites. Of the 88 medical only groups and 58 non-medical groups, 24 (27.3%) and 42 (72.4%) clearly stated the OoC cost, and 27 (30.7%) and 44 (75.9%) clearly states the annual oocyte storage cost, respectively. The OoC costs were significantly higher for the non-medical group than in the medical group. In the medical only group, the annual storage cost remained almost the same regardless of the number of oocytes, while in the non-medical group, the annual storage cost was 2–3 times higher than in the medical only group. Only 16 facilities (16/146, 11.0%) had mentioned the number of OoC procedures, and five facilities (3.4%) provided information on the clinical outcomes after OoC. Conclusion: Costs related to OoC are higher for the non-medical group in Japan. In addition, the websites contain scant information on the costs and clinical outcomes of OoC.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:20:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab50ad7b32a54328829ff9e3f1d3d8f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:20:57Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-ab50ad7b32a54328829ff9e3f1d3d8f92023-08-30T05:53:39ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402023-08-0198e19074The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in JapanHiromitsu Shirasawa0Yukiyo Kumazawa1Wataru Sato2Takuya Iwasawa3Kazue Togashi4Natsuki Ono5Ayaka Fujishima6Kazumasa Takahashi7Eri Maeda8Yukihiro Terada9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, Japan; Corresponding author. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita, 10-0825, Japan.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Environmental Health Science and Public Health, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan, Hondo 1-1-1, Akita City, Akita Prefecture, 10-0825, JapanResearch question: How does the cost-related oocyte cryopreservation (OoC) vary by the facility in Japan, and what data is provided on the websites about OoC procedures? Design: Website survey. The websites of all 621 facilities that provide assistive reproductive technology registered in Japan were surveyed in 2021. Data included the rates of explicit statements regarding the provision of OoC for only medical reasons (medical only group) or non-medical reasons (non-medical group). Based on whether or not facilities that perform OoC clearly stated the cost on their websites, we compared the costs of OoC and annual storage cost between medical only and non-medical groups. Furthermore, we examined the stated number of OoC procedures performed and their clinical outcomes. Results: Of the 621 facilities, 146 (23.5%) clearly stated that they offer OoC on their websites. Of the 88 medical only groups and 58 non-medical groups, 24 (27.3%) and 42 (72.4%) clearly stated the OoC cost, and 27 (30.7%) and 44 (75.9%) clearly states the annual oocyte storage cost, respectively. The OoC costs were significantly higher for the non-medical group than in the medical group. In the medical only group, the annual storage cost remained almost the same regardless of the number of oocytes, while in the non-medical group, the annual storage cost was 2–3 times higher than in the medical only group. Only 16 facilities (16/146, 11.0%) had mentioned the number of OoC procedures, and five facilities (3.4%) provided information on the clinical outcomes after OoC. Conclusion: Costs related to OoC are higher for the non-medical group in Japan. In addition, the websites contain scant information on the costs and clinical outcomes of OoC.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023062825Oocyte cryopreservationAnnual storage costMedicalNon-medicalFertility preservation
spellingShingle Hiromitsu Shirasawa
Yukiyo Kumazawa
Wataru Sato
Takuya Iwasawa
Kazue Togashi
Natsuki Ono
Ayaka Fujishima
Kazumasa Takahashi
Eri Maeda
Yukihiro Terada
The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan
Heliyon
Oocyte cryopreservation
Annual storage cost
Medical
Non-medical
Fertility preservation
title The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan
title_full The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan
title_fullStr The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan
title_full_unstemmed The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan
title_short The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan
title_sort first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non medical oocyte cryopreservation in japan
topic Oocyte cryopreservation
Annual storage cost
Medical
Non-medical
Fertility preservation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844023062825
work_keys_str_mv AT hiromitsushirasawa thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT yukiyokumazawa thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT watarusato thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT takuyaiwasawa thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT kazuetogashi thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT natsukiono thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT ayakafujishima thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT kazumasatakahashi thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT erimaeda thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT yukihiroterada thefirstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT hiromitsushirasawa firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT yukiyokumazawa firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT watarusato firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT takuyaiwasawa firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT kazuetogashi firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT natsukiono firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT ayakafujishima firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT kazumasatakahashi firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT erimaeda firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan
AT yukihiroterada firstnationwidewebsitesurveyoftheavailabilityandcostsofmedicalandnonmedicaloocytecryopreservationinjapan