Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection

Gaussian states and measurements collectively are not powerful-enough resources for quantum computing, as any Gaussian dynamics can be simulated efficiently, classically. However, it is known that any one non-Gaussian resource—a state, a unitary operation, or a measurement—together with Gaussian uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christos N. Gagatsos, Saikat Guha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2021-12-01
Series:Physical Review Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043182
_version_ 1797210876660416512
author Christos N. Gagatsos
Saikat Guha
author_facet Christos N. Gagatsos
Saikat Guha
author_sort Christos N. Gagatsos
collection DOAJ
description Gaussian states and measurements collectively are not powerful-enough resources for quantum computing, as any Gaussian dynamics can be simulated efficiently, classically. However, it is known that any one non-Gaussian resource—a state, a unitary operation, or a measurement—together with Gaussian unitaries, makes for universal quantum resources. Photon number resolving (PNR) detection, a readily realizable non-Gaussian measurement, has been a popular tool to try and engineer non-Gaussian states for universal quantum processing. In this paper, we consider PNR detection of a subset of the modes of a zero-mean pure multimode Gaussian state as a means to herald a target non-Gaussian state on the undetected modes. This is motivated from the ease of scalable preparation of Gaussian states that have zero mean, using squeezed vacuum and passive linear optics. We calculate upper bounds on the fidelity between the actual heralded state and the target state. We find that this fidelity upper bound is 1/2 when the target state is a multimode coherent cat-basis cluster state, a resource sufficient for universal quantum computing. This proves that there exist non-Gaussian states that are not producible by this method. Our fidelity upper bound is a simple expression that depends only on the target state represented in the photon-number basis, which could be applied to other non-Gaussian states of interest.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T10:17:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab5a099a16254386841086a232ce7c04
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2643-1564
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T10:17:34Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher American Physical Society
record_format Article
series Physical Review Research
spelling doaj.art-ab5a099a16254386841086a232ce7c042024-04-12T17:16:22ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Research2643-15642021-12-013404318210.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043182Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detectionChristos N. GagatsosSaikat GuhaGaussian states and measurements collectively are not powerful-enough resources for quantum computing, as any Gaussian dynamics can be simulated efficiently, classically. However, it is known that any one non-Gaussian resource—a state, a unitary operation, or a measurement—together with Gaussian unitaries, makes for universal quantum resources. Photon number resolving (PNR) detection, a readily realizable non-Gaussian measurement, has been a popular tool to try and engineer non-Gaussian states for universal quantum processing. In this paper, we consider PNR detection of a subset of the modes of a zero-mean pure multimode Gaussian state as a means to herald a target non-Gaussian state on the undetected modes. This is motivated from the ease of scalable preparation of Gaussian states that have zero mean, using squeezed vacuum and passive linear optics. We calculate upper bounds on the fidelity between the actual heralded state and the target state. We find that this fidelity upper bound is 1/2 when the target state is a multimode coherent cat-basis cluster state, a resource sufficient for universal quantum computing. This proves that there exist non-Gaussian states that are not producible by this method. Our fidelity upper bound is a simple expression that depends only on the target state represented in the photon-number basis, which could be applied to other non-Gaussian states of interest.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043182
spellingShingle Christos N. Gagatsos
Saikat Guha
Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
Physical Review Research
title Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
title_full Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
title_fullStr Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
title_full_unstemmed Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
title_short Impossibility to produce arbitrary non-Gaussian states using zero-mean Gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
title_sort impossibility to produce arbitrary non gaussian states using zero mean gaussian states and partial photon number resolving detection
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.043182
work_keys_str_mv AT christosngagatsos impossibilitytoproducearbitrarynongaussianstatesusingzeromeangaussianstatesandpartialphotonnumberresolvingdetection
AT saikatguha impossibilitytoproducearbitrarynongaussianstatesusingzeromeangaussianstatesandpartialphotonnumberresolvingdetection