Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions

The intense engagement of populists with constitutionalism—a phenomenon originally related to experiences in Latin America—is increasingly evident in some of the new European Union member states. But the populist phenomenon is clearly not confined to more recently established democracies. Populist c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Blokker, Bojan Bugaric, Gábor Halmai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019-04-01
Series:German Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2071832219000245/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156192097992704
author Paul Blokker
Bojan Bugaric
Gábor Halmai
author_facet Paul Blokker
Bojan Bugaric
Gábor Halmai
author_sort Paul Blokker
collection DOAJ
description The intense engagement of populists with constitutionalism—a phenomenon originally related to experiences in Latin America—is increasingly evident in some of the new European Union member states. But the populist phenomenon is clearly not confined to more recently established democracies. Populist constitutionalism stands for a number of distinctive tendencies in constitutional politics and practices which frequently are in tension with—and may even threaten—fundamental values, human rights, representative democracy, and the rule of law. The relation between populism and constitutionalism is, however, not necessarily one of anti-thesis, but rather manifests itself in distinctive ways, depending on specific contexts and variations. In this special issue, we argue that populist constitutionalism is best analyzed in a comparative, and historically and contextually attuned manner. The special issue wants to contribute to understandings of populist constitutionalism, which are both theoretically more robust and able to comparatively reflect on a diversity of “really existing” cases. The various contributions discuss central dimensions to the populist phenomenon. These pertain in particular to: (a) The varieties of populist engagement with constitutionalism; (b) a deeper understanding of the populist mindset; (c) the position-taking and reaction of constitutional scholars to populism; (d) the complex relation and overlap of populism with illiberalism and authoritarianism; and (e) the central nature of constituent power in populist projects.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:47:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab5c97d5e0d84173a3ca35e5ece2261c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2071-8322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:47:24Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series German Law Journal
spelling doaj.art-ab5c97d5e0d84173a3ca35e5ece2261c2023-03-09T12:35:05ZengCambridge University PressGerman Law Journal2071-83222019-04-012029129510.1017/glj.2019.24Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictionsPaul BlokkerBojan BugaricGábor HalmaiThe intense engagement of populists with constitutionalism—a phenomenon originally related to experiences in Latin America—is increasingly evident in some of the new European Union member states. But the populist phenomenon is clearly not confined to more recently established democracies. Populist constitutionalism stands for a number of distinctive tendencies in constitutional politics and practices which frequently are in tension with—and may even threaten—fundamental values, human rights, representative democracy, and the rule of law. The relation between populism and constitutionalism is, however, not necessarily one of anti-thesis, but rather manifests itself in distinctive ways, depending on specific contexts and variations. In this special issue, we argue that populist constitutionalism is best analyzed in a comparative, and historically and contextually attuned manner. The special issue wants to contribute to understandings of populist constitutionalism, which are both theoretically more robust and able to comparatively reflect on a diversity of “really existing” cases. The various contributions discuss central dimensions to the populist phenomenon. These pertain in particular to: (a) The varieties of populist engagement with constitutionalism; (b) a deeper understanding of the populist mindset; (c) the position-taking and reaction of constitutional scholars to populism; (d) the complex relation and overlap of populism with illiberalism and authoritarianism; and (e) the central nature of constituent power in populist projects.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2071832219000245/type/journal_articlevarieties of populismlegalpoliticaldemocraticcommunitariantransnational constitutionalism
spellingShingle Paul Blokker
Bojan Bugaric
Gábor Halmai
Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions
German Law Journal
varieties of populism
legal
political
democratic
communitarian
transnational constitutionalism
title Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions
title_full Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions
title_fullStr Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions
title_full_unstemmed Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions
title_short Introduction: Populist constitutionalism: Varieties, complexities, and contradictions
title_sort introduction populist constitutionalism varieties complexities and contradictions
topic varieties of populism
legal
political
democratic
communitarian
transnational constitutionalism
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2071832219000245/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT paulblokker introductionpopulistconstitutionalismvarietiescomplexitiesandcontradictions
AT bojanbugaric introductionpopulistconstitutionalismvarietiescomplexitiesandcontradictions
AT gaborhalmai introductionpopulistconstitutionalismvarietiescomplexitiesandcontradictions