A national and international analysis of changing forest density.
Like cities, forests grow by spreading out or by growing denser. Both inventories taken steadily by a single nation and other inventories gathered recently from many nations by the United Nations confirm the asynchronous effects of changing area and of density or volume per hectare. United States fo...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2011-05-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21573125/?tool=EBI |
| _version_ | 1818404448932724736 |
|---|---|
| author | Aapo Rautiainen Iddo Wernick Paul E Waggoner Jesse H Ausubel Pekka E Kauppi |
| author_facet | Aapo Rautiainen Iddo Wernick Paul E Waggoner Jesse H Ausubel Pekka E Kauppi |
| author_sort | Aapo Rautiainen |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Like cities, forests grow by spreading out or by growing denser. Both inventories taken steadily by a single nation and other inventories gathered recently from many nations by the United Nations confirm the asynchronous effects of changing area and of density or volume per hectare. United States forests spread little after 1953, while growing density per hectare increased national volume and thus sequestered carbon. The 2010 United Nations appraisal of global forests during the briefer span of two decades after 1990 reveals a similar pattern: A slowing decline of area with growing volume means growing density in 68 nations encompassing 72% of reported global forest land and 68% of reported global carbon mass. To summarize, the nations were placed in 5 regions named for continents. During 1990-2010 national density grew unevenly, but nevertheless grew in all regions. Growing density was responsible for substantially increasing sequestered carbon in the European and North American regions, despite smaller changes in area. Density nudged upward in the African and South American regions as area loss outstripped the loss of carbon. For the Asian region, density grew in the first decade and fell slightly in the second as forest area expanded. The different courses of area and density disqualify area as a proxy for volume and carbon. Applying forestry methods traditionally used to measure timber volumes still offers a necessary route to measuring carbon stocks. With little expansion of forest area, managing for timber growth and density offered a way to increase carbon stocks. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T08:40:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ab6823e539a845eca039973365b49474 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T08:40:19Z |
| publishDate | 2011-05-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-ab6823e539a845eca039973365b494742022-12-21T23:09:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032011-05-0165e1957710.1371/journal.pone.0019577A national and international analysis of changing forest density.Aapo RautiainenIddo WernickPaul E WaggonerJesse H AusubelPekka E KauppiLike cities, forests grow by spreading out or by growing denser. Both inventories taken steadily by a single nation and other inventories gathered recently from many nations by the United Nations confirm the asynchronous effects of changing area and of density or volume per hectare. United States forests spread little after 1953, while growing density per hectare increased national volume and thus sequestered carbon. The 2010 United Nations appraisal of global forests during the briefer span of two decades after 1990 reveals a similar pattern: A slowing decline of area with growing volume means growing density in 68 nations encompassing 72% of reported global forest land and 68% of reported global carbon mass. To summarize, the nations were placed in 5 regions named for continents. During 1990-2010 national density grew unevenly, but nevertheless grew in all regions. Growing density was responsible for substantially increasing sequestered carbon in the European and North American regions, despite smaller changes in area. Density nudged upward in the African and South American regions as area loss outstripped the loss of carbon. For the Asian region, density grew in the first decade and fell slightly in the second as forest area expanded. The different courses of area and density disqualify area as a proxy for volume and carbon. Applying forestry methods traditionally used to measure timber volumes still offers a necessary route to measuring carbon stocks. With little expansion of forest area, managing for timber growth and density offered a way to increase carbon stocks.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21573125/?tool=EBI |
| spellingShingle | Aapo Rautiainen Iddo Wernick Paul E Waggoner Jesse H Ausubel Pekka E Kauppi A national and international analysis of changing forest density. PLoS ONE |
| title | A national and international analysis of changing forest density. |
| title_full | A national and international analysis of changing forest density. |
| title_fullStr | A national and international analysis of changing forest density. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A national and international analysis of changing forest density. |
| title_short | A national and international analysis of changing forest density. |
| title_sort | national and international analysis of changing forest density |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/21573125/?tool=EBI |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aaporautiainen anationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT iddowernick anationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT paulewaggoner anationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT jessehausubel anationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT pekkaekauppi anationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT aaporautiainen nationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT iddowernick nationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT paulewaggoner nationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT jessehausubel nationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity AT pekkaekauppi nationalandinternationalanalysisofchangingforestdensity |