Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review
BackgroundHome assessment is a critical component of successful home modifications, enabling individuals with functional limitations to age in place comfortably. A high-quality home assessment tool should facilitate a valid and reliable assessment involving health care and ho...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2024-03-01
|
| Series: | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| Online Access: | https://mhealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e52996 |
| _version_ | 1797265887881854976 |
|---|---|
| author | Jung-hye Shin Rachael Shields Jenny Lee Zachary Skrove Ross Tredinnick Kevin Ponto Beth Fields |
| author_facet | Jung-hye Shin Rachael Shields Jenny Lee Zachary Skrove Ross Tredinnick Kevin Ponto Beth Fields |
| author_sort | Jung-hye Shin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundHome assessment is a critical component of successful home modifications, enabling individuals with functional limitations to age in place comfortably. A high-quality home assessment tool should facilitate a valid and reliable assessment involving health care and housing professionals, while also engaging and empowering consumers and their caregivers who may be dealing with multiple functional limitations. Unlike traditional paper-and-pencil assessments, which require extensive training and expert knowledge and can be alienating to consumers, mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to engage all parties involved, empowering and activating consumers to take action. However, little is known about which apps contain all the necessary functionality, quality appraisal, and accessibility.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the functionality, overall quality, and accessibility of mHealth home assessment apps.
MethodsmHealth apps enabling home assessment for aging in place were identified through a comprehensive search of scholarly articles, the Apple (iOS) and Google Play (Android) stores in the United States, and fnd.io. The search was conducted between November 2022 and January 2023 following a method adapted from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Reviewers performed a content analysis of the mobile app features to evaluate their functionality, overall quality, and accessibility. The functionality assessment used a home assessment component matrix specifically developed for this study. For overall quality, the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used to determine the apps’ effectiveness in engaging and activating consumers and their caregivers. Accessibility was assessed using the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (A and AA levels). These 3 assessments were synthesized and visualized to provide a comprehensive evaluation.
ResultsA total of 698 apps were initially identified. After further screening, only 6 apps remained. Our review revealed that none of the apps used thoroughly tested assessment tools, offered all the functionality required for reliable home assessment, achieved the “good” quality threshold as measured by the MARS, or met the accessibility criteria when evaluated against WCAG 2.1. However, DIYModify received the highest scores in both the overall quality and accessibility assessments. The MapIt apps also showed significant potential due to their ability to measure the 3D environment and the inclusion of a desktop version that extends the app’s functionality.
ConclusionsOur review revealed that there are very few apps available within the United States that possess the necessary functionality, engaging qualities, and accessibility to effectively activate consumers and their caregivers for successful home modification. Future app development should prioritize the integration of reliable and thoroughly tested assessment tools as the foundation of the development process. Furthermore, efforts should be made to enhance the overall quality and accessibility of these apps to better engage and empower consumers to take necessary actions to age in place. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-25T00:51:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ab6894aa904846cbbcb55ba0e291fb1b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2291-5222 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-25T00:51:57Z |
| publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| spelling | doaj.art-ab6894aa904846cbbcb55ba0e291fb1b2024-03-11T16:00:36ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR mHealth and uHealth2291-52222024-03-0112e5299610.2196/52996Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic ReviewJung-hye Shinhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3443-8647Rachael Shieldshttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-0597-4180Jenny Leehttps://orcid.org/0009-0006-3944-6669Zachary Skrovehttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-1526-9158Ross Tredinnickhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-9561Kevin Pontohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4156-9693Beth Fieldshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-7144 BackgroundHome assessment is a critical component of successful home modifications, enabling individuals with functional limitations to age in place comfortably. A high-quality home assessment tool should facilitate a valid and reliable assessment involving health care and housing professionals, while also engaging and empowering consumers and their caregivers who may be dealing with multiple functional limitations. Unlike traditional paper-and-pencil assessments, which require extensive training and expert knowledge and can be alienating to consumers, mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to engage all parties involved, empowering and activating consumers to take action. However, little is known about which apps contain all the necessary functionality, quality appraisal, and accessibility. ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess the functionality, overall quality, and accessibility of mHealth home assessment apps. MethodsmHealth apps enabling home assessment for aging in place were identified through a comprehensive search of scholarly articles, the Apple (iOS) and Google Play (Android) stores in the United States, and fnd.io. The search was conducted between November 2022 and January 2023 following a method adapted from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Reviewers performed a content analysis of the mobile app features to evaluate their functionality, overall quality, and accessibility. The functionality assessment used a home assessment component matrix specifically developed for this study. For overall quality, the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used to determine the apps’ effectiveness in engaging and activating consumers and their caregivers. Accessibility was assessed using the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (A and AA levels). These 3 assessments were synthesized and visualized to provide a comprehensive evaluation. ResultsA total of 698 apps were initially identified. After further screening, only 6 apps remained. Our review revealed that none of the apps used thoroughly tested assessment tools, offered all the functionality required for reliable home assessment, achieved the “good” quality threshold as measured by the MARS, or met the accessibility criteria when evaluated against WCAG 2.1. However, DIYModify received the highest scores in both the overall quality and accessibility assessments. The MapIt apps also showed significant potential due to their ability to measure the 3D environment and the inclusion of a desktop version that extends the app’s functionality. ConclusionsOur review revealed that there are very few apps available within the United States that possess the necessary functionality, engaging qualities, and accessibility to effectively activate consumers and their caregivers for successful home modification. Future app development should prioritize the integration of reliable and thoroughly tested assessment tools as the foundation of the development process. Furthermore, efforts should be made to enhance the overall quality and accessibility of these apps to better engage and empower consumers to take necessary actions to age in place.https://mhealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e52996 |
| spellingShingle | Jung-hye Shin Rachael Shields Jenny Lee Zachary Skrove Ross Tredinnick Kevin Ponto Beth Fields Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| title | Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review |
| title_full | Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review |
| title_short | Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review |
| title_sort | quality and accessibility of home assessment mhealth apps for community living systematic review |
| url | https://mhealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e52996 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT junghyeshin qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview AT rachaelshields qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview AT jennylee qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview AT zacharyskrove qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview AT rosstredinnick qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview AT kevinponto qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview AT bethfields qualityandaccessibilityofhomeassessmentmhealthappsforcommunitylivingsystematicreview |