Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry

Background and purpose: Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been recommended for post-resuscitation care of cardiac arrest (CA) patients who remain comatose. However, the differences between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic causes need further investigation. Thus, this study aimed to investigat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mei-Tzu Wang, Min-Shan Tsai, Chien-Hua Huang, Li-Kuo Kuo, Hsinhui Hsu, Chih-Hung Lai, Kun Chang Lin, Wei-Chun Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664622004296
_version_ 1827900904457633792
author Mei-Tzu Wang
Min-Shan Tsai
Chien-Hua Huang
Li-Kuo Kuo
Hsinhui Hsu
Chih-Hung Lai
Kun Chang Lin
Wei-Chun Huang
author_facet Mei-Tzu Wang
Min-Shan Tsai
Chien-Hua Huang
Li-Kuo Kuo
Hsinhui Hsu
Chih-Hung Lai
Kun Chang Lin
Wei-Chun Huang
author_sort Mei-Tzu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been recommended for post-resuscitation care of cardiac arrest (CA) patients who remain comatose. However, the differences between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic causes need further investigation. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the difference in outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic CA patients receiving TTM. Methods: The TIMECARD registry established the study cohort and database for patients receiving TTM between January 2013 and September 2019. A total of 543 patients were enrolled, with 305 and 238 patients in the cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic groups, respectively. Results: Compared with the non-cardiogenic group, the cardiogenic group had higher proportion of initial shockable rhythm, better survival (cardiogenic: 45.9%; non-cardiogenic: 30.7%, P = 0.0017), and better neurologic performance at discharge. In the cardiogenic group, witnessed collapse (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13–0.72), and coronary intervention (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24–0.84) were positive predictors for overall outcome. Mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg led to poor outcome regardless in the cardiogenic (OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.46–7.52) or non-cardiogenic group (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.06–5.39). Conclusion: Patients with cardiogenic CA post TTM had better survival and neurologic performance at discharge than those without cardiogenic CA. Cardiogenic etiology was a potential predictor of better cardiac arrest survival, but it was not an independent risk factor for overall outcome after adjusting for potential covariates. In the cardiogenic group, better outcomes were reported in patients with witnessed collapse, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, as well as those receiving coronary intervention.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:38:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab7299b799fc4396b8468d9f288c5c11
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0929-6646
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:38:59Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
spelling doaj.art-ab7299b799fc4396b8468d9f288c5c112023-07-15T04:28:11ZengElsevierJournal of the Formosan Medical Association0929-66462023-08-011228675689Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registryMei-Tzu Wang0Min-Shan Tsai1Chien-Hua Huang2Li-Kuo Kuo3Hsinhui Hsu4Chih-Hung Lai5Kun Chang Lin6Wei-Chun Huang7Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei branch, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, TaiwanCardiovascular Center, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan; Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Therapy, Fooyin University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Corresponding author. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No. 386, Dazhong 1st Rd., Zuoying Dist., Kaohsiung City 813, Taiwan.Background and purpose: Targeted temperature management (TTM) has been recommended for post-resuscitation care of cardiac arrest (CA) patients who remain comatose. However, the differences between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic causes need further investigation. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the difference in outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic CA patients receiving TTM. Methods: The TIMECARD registry established the study cohort and database for patients receiving TTM between January 2013 and September 2019. A total of 543 patients were enrolled, with 305 and 238 patients in the cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic groups, respectively. Results: Compared with the non-cardiogenic group, the cardiogenic group had higher proportion of initial shockable rhythm, better survival (cardiogenic: 45.9%; non-cardiogenic: 30.7%, P = 0.0017), and better neurologic performance at discharge. In the cardiogenic group, witnessed collapse (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13–0.72), and coronary intervention (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24–0.84) were positive predictors for overall outcome. Mean arterial pressure <65 mmHg led to poor outcome regardless in the cardiogenic (OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 1.46–7.52) or non-cardiogenic group (OR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.06–5.39). Conclusion: Patients with cardiogenic CA post TTM had better survival and neurologic performance at discharge than those without cardiogenic CA. Cardiogenic etiology was a potential predictor of better cardiac arrest survival, but it was not an independent risk factor for overall outcome after adjusting for potential covariates. In the cardiogenic group, better outcomes were reported in patients with witnessed collapse, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, as well as those receiving coronary intervention.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664622004296Cardiopulmonary resuscitationCoronary interventionDefibrillatorsHeart arrestHypothermiaInduced
spellingShingle Mei-Tzu Wang
Min-Shan Tsai
Chien-Hua Huang
Li-Kuo Kuo
Hsinhui Hsu
Chih-Hung Lai
Kun Chang Lin
Wei-Chun Huang
Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
Journal of the Formosan Medical Association
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Coronary intervention
Defibrillators
Heart arrest
Hypothermia
Induced
title Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
title_full Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
title_fullStr Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
title_short Comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management: The nationwide TIMECARD multicenter registry
title_sort comparison of outcomes between cardiogenic and non cardiogenic cardiac arrest patients receiving targeted temperature management the nationwide timecard multicenter registry
topic Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Coronary intervention
Defibrillators
Heart arrest
Hypothermia
Induced
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0929664622004296
work_keys_str_mv AT meitzuwang comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT minshantsai comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT chienhuahuang comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT likuokuo comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT hsinhuihsu comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT chihhunglai comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT kunchanglin comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry
AT weichunhuang comparisonofoutcomesbetweencardiogenicandnoncardiogeniccardiacarrestpatientsreceivingtargetedtemperaturemanagementthenationwidetimecardmulticenterregistry