Thrombolysis versus unfractionated heparin for hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Currently, thrombolytic therapy (TLT) for pulmonary embolism (PE) is recommended only for patients with high-risk PE. At the same time, in real practice, TLT is often performed in hemodynamically stable patients. The main contradiction arises due to the different risk-benefit ratio of TLT in compari...
Main Authors: | N. A. Cherepanova, A. А. Podlipaeva, E. S. Andreeva, E. N. Umyarova, I. S. Mullova, T. V. Pavlova, D. V. Duplyakov |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Российский кардиологический журнал |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5120 |
Similar Items
-
Therapeutic inefficacy of protocol driven intravenous unfractionated heparin infusion in the current era
by: Kayla Torppey, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Comparison of Two Nomograms of Unfractionated Heparin in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
by: Moneyreh Modares Mosadegh, et al.
Published: (2013-02-01) -
LMWHs have additional advantage over unfractionated heparin: no volume load
by: GP Koracevic
Published: (2009-10-01) -
Effectiveness, safety, and costs of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in inpatients with obesity
by: Alpesh Amin, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Thrombolytic Therapy in Normotensive Patients with Pulmonary Embolism (Data from the Retrospective Study)
by: N. A. Сherepanova, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)