Trade-offs between sight lines and escape habitat determine spatial strategies of risk management by a keystone herbivore
Prey individuals possess four basic strategies to manage predation risk while foraging: time allocation, space use, apprehension, and foraging tenacity. But there are no direct tests of theory detailing how spatial strategies change and covary from fine to coarse scales of environmental variability....
Main Authors: | Douglas W. Morris, Sundararaj Vijayan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Canadian Science Publishing
2018-03-01
|
Series: | FACETS |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0062 |
Similar Items
-
Contingent strategies of risk management by snowshoe hares
by: Douglas W. Morris
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Risk of predation: a critical force driving habitat quality perception and foraging behavior of granivorous birds in a Nigerian forest reserve
by: Umarfarooq A. Abdulwahab, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Long-term monitoring in the boreal forest reveals high spatio-temporal variability among primary ecosystem constituents
by: Charles J. Krebs, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Mosquitoes from Europe Are Able to Transmit Snowshoe Hare Virus
by: Stephanie Jansen, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
So many choices, so little time: Food preference and movement vary with the landscape of fear
by: Clara Mendes Ferreira, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)