The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice

Observing other people snacking can affect one’s own consumption behavior. The present experiment tested whether temporal distance moderates imitation of brand choice and the number of snacks consumed. Based on previous research demonstrating that psychological distance (e.g., temporal or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia Bischoff, Leonie Reutner, Jochim Hansen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Foods
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/2/228
_version_ 1811315919063875584
author Claudia Bischoff
Leonie Reutner
Jochim Hansen
author_facet Claudia Bischoff
Leonie Reutner
Jochim Hansen
author_sort Claudia Bischoff
collection DOAJ
description Observing other people snacking can affect one&#8217;s own consumption behavior. The present experiment tested whether temporal distance moderates imitation of brand choice and the number of snacks consumed. Based on previous research demonstrating that psychological distance (e.g., temporal or spatial distance) reduces imitation of movements, we hypothesized that participants would imitate the amount of food intake to a lesser degree when they temporally distance themselves from a model person. To test this idea, participants (<i>n</i> = 113) were asked to imagine their life either the next day (proximal condition) or in one year (distant condition). Next, participants watched a video clip depicting a model person who chose one of two brands of pretzels and ate either plenty or just a few of the pretzels. Then, participants chose one of the two brands of pretzels, served themselves as many of the pretzels as they liked, and ate them while filling in a tasting questionnaire. As expected, participants primed with proximity imitated snack intake more than participants primed with distance. The brand choice was not affected by self-distancing. Implications for snacking behavior are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:38:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab956a1d547e41569171485b04b2e840
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-8158
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:38:47Z
publishDate 2020-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Foods
spelling doaj.art-ab956a1d547e41569171485b04b2e8402022-12-22T02:48:21ZengMDPI AGFoods2304-81582020-02-019222810.3390/foods9020228foods9020228The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand ChoiceClaudia Bischoff0Leonie Reutner1Jochim Hansen2Department of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, 4056 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, 5020 Salzburg, AustriaObserving other people snacking can affect one&#8217;s own consumption behavior. The present experiment tested whether temporal distance moderates imitation of brand choice and the number of snacks consumed. Based on previous research demonstrating that psychological distance (e.g., temporal or spatial distance) reduces imitation of movements, we hypothesized that participants would imitate the amount of food intake to a lesser degree when they temporally distance themselves from a model person. To test this idea, participants (<i>n</i> = 113) were asked to imagine their life either the next day (proximal condition) or in one year (distant condition). Next, participants watched a video clip depicting a model person who chose one of two brands of pretzels and ate either plenty or just a few of the pretzels. Then, participants chose one of the two brands of pretzels, served themselves as many of the pretzels as they liked, and ate them while filling in a tasting questionnaire. As expected, participants primed with proximity imitated snack intake more than participants primed with distance. The brand choice was not affected by self-distancing. Implications for snacking behavior are discussed.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/2/228imitationsocial modelingpsychological distancefood intakesnacking behavior
spellingShingle Claudia Bischoff
Leonie Reutner
Jochim Hansen
The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
Foods
imitation
social modeling
psychological distance
food intake
snacking behavior
title The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
title_full The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
title_fullStr The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
title_full_unstemmed The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
title_short The Snacking Chameleon: Psychological Proximity Increases Imitation of Food Intake Independently of Brand Choice
title_sort snacking chameleon psychological proximity increases imitation of food intake independently of brand choice
topic imitation
social modeling
psychological distance
food intake
snacking behavior
url https://www.mdpi.com/2304-8158/9/2/228
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiabischoff thesnackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice
AT leoniereutner thesnackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice
AT jochimhansen thesnackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice
AT claudiabischoff snackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice
AT leoniereutner snackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice
AT jochimhansen snackingchameleonpsychologicalproximityincreasesimitationoffoodintakeindependentlyofbrandchoice